• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • Site updates coming next Wednesday at 8am CT!

    The site will be down for routine maintenance on Wednesday 6/5 starting at 8am CT. If you have any questions, please PM alexj-12!

looking for new hunting rifle for large western game

I've killed quite a few with my Malory Archer .357. Is killing them with a pistol caliber not ethical?
To Each Their Own for me to Kill an Elk with a .357 magnum doesn’t seem ethical, deer sure but that’s a whole different critter in Closing it’s not what I Would Do while I Don’t think You Should I haven’t/Won’t tell you/anyone not to…….
 
280 AI > 270 Win.
Last I looked into it Winchester chambers a .280
 
The 6.5CM was an example of me stepping down in kinetic energy yet getting better wound channels with better bullets. It was just to highlight the bullet thing. A .223 using bullets that don't suck (77gr TMK) can kill an elk easily. Search "rokslide 223 for elk" and there's a thread over there with 360+ pages that has hundreds of pictures of elk killed with .223s as well as pictures of the wound channels. If you want to argue it over there in the face of real world results then go crazy with it.

People who are hung up on cartridge choice don't really understand what you're getting at unfortunately.

The 1500 ft/lbs of energy cutoff is a myth that has no basis in reality. Bullets perform based on minimum impact velocity. With an ELD-M you're fine down to 1400 fps. With Barnes, Berger, ELD-X, and Nosler you supposedly need 1800+ fps impact velocity but it's more like 2000+ for some of them. Energy isn't a useful predictor of terminal performance.

OP, this is easy to calculate. What is the max range you plan to shoot at an animal? Pick a bullet of your choosing, plug it into a ballistic calc, and start playing with the muzzle velocity. Once you have a muzzle velocity where the bullet still has its minimum needed impact velocity at your max range, you know what cartridge to use. A great do-it-all rifle would be a 6CM shooting 108gr ELD-Ms but not sure which factory rifles are chambered in that.
All in bullet selection and placement. Not an Elk, but on my first ever Muley hunt, after slipping on ice and falling in rocks on top of my .270, I dropped a mule deer in its track's with my coyote gun 6 Creed, 16.5' barrel, suppressed, with Hornady 103 eldx's (handholds) at 350+ yd's. Guides were doing high five's and saying they thought they would be tracking all night. Shot through both shoulders. Don't recall velocity but It was also a very low velocity node, 41.1 gn H 4350. I had two guides because one's hunter had left that morning. Afterwards found out my guide shot a .204 as a backup gun for everything including Elk and the other one a .243
.
 
LOL shit cant help but go off track around here like nowhere I've ever seen. right now all I have is a 6 creed in the stable and I'm not taking it. I don't care how confident I am with it . everybody I know that hunt elk every year tells me to go with anything to at the least a 270, and is further reinforced by their guides telling them to do so even if you are a good marksman. I'm simply deferring to the people i personally know for a fact shoot elk every year. This simply presented me with an opportunity to get a rifle that had been on my mind for some time now which was a mod 70 with wood stock like the 257 I grew up shooting with my father that was lost years ago.
I've done some guiding myself and most of the Sportsmen ar so scared of their .??? Magnum that they can't hit shit.
 
I've done some guiding myself and most of the Sportsmen ar so scared of their .??? Magnum that they can't hit shit.
People, especially eastern hunters, have a really interesting outlook on hunting guides. A guide's main job is knowing the local terrain and where/how to find animals in it. And the demographic of hunters they deal with aren't exactly the best at shooting.
 
fyi if you are going to get a tikka, check out grabagun.com and their price quote. just bought a lefty tikka t3x lite in 7rm to scavenge the action for a 6.5 prc build (proof carbon barrel and pure precision altitude stock). $810, 10 ship. jaoutdoors is selling the same action only for $875. the lite's aren't threaded for cans or brakes, but the veil and roughtech models are.
 
Aero Precision Solus Hunter

If a .308 or 6.5 Creedmoor would fill the bill then this is a pretty good deal and I think you can get an additional 10% off of this price with the promo code they are running.

I am in no way shape or form associated with Aero Precision or Midway USA just figured I would pass along a good deal.
 
Last edited:
LOL shit cant help but go off track around here like nowhere I've ever seen. right now all I have is a 6 creed in the stable and I'm not taking it. I don't care how confident I am with it . everybody I know that hunt elk every year tells me to go with anything to at the least a 270, and is further reinforced by their guides telling them to do so even if you are a good marksman. I'm simply deferring to the people i personally know for a fact shoot elk every year. This simply presented me with an opportunity to get a rifle that had been on my mind for some time now which was a mod 70 with wood stock like the 257 I grew up shooting with my father that was lost years ago.
I haven’t shot the new 70’s since they came back into production, but the older ones are great. I wouldn’t expect the accuracy of a seekins, but they easily hold minute of animal. The best I’ve ever seen out of the 7 I’ve owned was a legit 1/2 minute gun, the average is more 3/4-1 minute. I hear the Portugal made ones are more accurate.

Caliber wise, any of what you’re looking at should work. No elk but black bears, caribou, moose, bison, and deer, I’ve shot with 270 WSM, 30’06, 7mm rem mag, 6.5 creed, 300 WSM. My current hunting stick is a semi custom tikka in 300 WSM, long throated to put the bullet where it should be. I really like the WSM cartridges. If you go 300 WSM, load 200 gr eldx at 2800-2850, kills like a light switch.
 
I haven’t shot the new 70’s since they came back into production, but the older ones are great. I wouldn’t expect the accuracy of a seekins, but they easily hold minute of animal. The best I’ve ever seen out of the 7 I’ve owned was a legit 1/2 minute gun, the average is more 3/4-1 minute. I hear the Portugal made ones are more accurate.

Caliber wise, any of what you’re looking at should work. No elk but black bears, caribou, moose, bison, and deer, I’ve shot with 270 WSM, 30’06, 7mm rem mag, 6.5 creed, 300 WSM. My current hunting stick is a semi custom tikka in 300 WSM, long throated to put the bullet where it should be. I really like the WSM cartridges. If you go 300 WSM, load 200 gr eldx at 2800-2850, kills like a light switch.
Barrel length, powder, weight, and throat depth, who has the reamer? Or was the Tikka stock?
Sound'd like exactly what I want.
I need details!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BJames
Barrel length, powder, weight, and throat depth, who has the reamer? Or was the Tikka stock?
Sound'd like exactly what I want.
I need details!!
Bartlein cf 20”, Mesa (now pure) precision altitude, mountain tactical tikka everything. With a zeiss v4 in nightforce UL rings and my ultra 5 can, it weighs 8lb 13oz unloaded with mountain tac’s 5 round mag.

Not sure on the throat depth, kinport peak rifles in ID built it. After a couple phone conversations of what I wanted, I made a dummy case with where I wanted the bullet at and he throated it for that. I just seated a 200 eldx a thou or 2 ahead of the neck/shoulder junction and went with that. It’s my second 300 WSM and have a couple loads for it. RL26 in a 24” proof cf gets 2860. The new rig is running 2800 with h1000, but it’s only at 56 rounds so far. We’ll see where speed lands as it speeds up, It’s quickly turning into my favorite hunting rifle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: moosemeat
Bartlein cf 20”, Mesa (now pure) precision altitude, mountain tactical tikka everything. With a zeiss v4 in nightforce UL rings and my ultra 5 can, it weighs 8lb 13oz unloaded with mountain tac’s 5 round mag.

Not sure on the throat depth, kinport peak rifles in ID built it. After a couple phone conversations of what I wanted, I made a dummy case with where I wanted the bullet at and he throated it for that. I just seated a 200 eldx a thou or 2 ahead of the neck/shoulder junction and went with that. It’s my second 300 WSM and have a couple loads for it. RL26 in a 24” proof cf gets 2860. The new rig is running 2800 with h1000, but it’s only at 56 rounds so far. We’ll see where speed lands as it speeds up, It’s quickly turning into my favorite hunting rifle.
Thank you!! That is the info I needed. I have been hearing from different people about running in long action or hand feeding. One more question. What is COAL with 200 ELDX?
 
Thank you!! That is the info I needed. I have been hearing from different people about running in long action or hand feeding. One more question. What is COAL with 200 ELDX?
It’s around 3.14ish, sorry don’t have the exact data handy right now. Definitely want to run it in a long or medium action. I went with the tikka mostly because I had it, it’s a medium action just run long action bolt stop. Also, they’re about as light as it gets without going ti.

I don’t mind single feeding on a dedicated long range rig, but I’d never do it with a hunting rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supercorndogs
I'm a big fan of the M70 Classic actions. But if you're going to buy another rifle, why get the same caliber?

What we've learned about cartridge design and long range shooting over the past decade would make me strongly consider getting a 6.8 Western. I think it's the ultimate long range big game hunting cartridge and would choose it for all North American deer and elk (overkill for eastern whitetails IMO), and African plains game as part of a 2-rifle battery (the other being a .375 H&H).

A M70 Super Grade is a very beautiful rifle... I own several of them.
 
Thank you!! That is the info I needed. I have been hearing from different people about running in long action or hand feeding. One more question. What is COAL with 200 ELDX?
I’m running a very similar setup on my wsm. Except 22” barrel and 212 eld-x and I get 2760 with ADG brass and H100v. I also have some Win brass that likes h4831sc. C6 custom throated it for me with 212s and I’m running a similar coal.

IMG_4546.jpeg
 
What we've learned about cartridge design and long range shooting over the past decade would make me strongly consider getting a 6.8 Western. I think it's the ultimate long range big game hunting cartridge and would choose it for all North American deer and elk (overkill for eastern whitetails IMO), and African plains game as part of a 2-rifle battery (the other being a .375 H&H).
Ron Spomer is that you?
 
What does the 6.8 Western offer that the 6.5 prc doesn't? Beside limited bullet selection, single source brass, and limited rifle availability.
 
What does the 6.8 Western offer that the 6.5 prc doesn't? Beside limited bullet selection, single source brass, and limited rifle availability.
It shoots heavier bullets at the same velocity as the 6.5 PRC, kicks less than the 7 or 300 PRC, puts sufficient energy for big game out to at least 800 yards. And shoots as flat or flatter. It's really a well-designed cartridge. I'd choose a 6 GT for PRS and 6.8 Western as an all-around long range hunting cartridge. Both work in short actions. Re bullet choices, I don't need a lot of choices, I need enough choices.

The 6.8 Western is what the WSMs should have been. What's the point in having a Magnum cartridge that can't handle high BC bullets?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boatninja
@Forrest84

I have a Win 70 Featherweight I bought new in Dec of 2021. It is chambered in 6.5 Creed and is accurate, reliable, and beautiful. I was hesitant as I believe the barrels are made in Spain, but had no reason to worry.

I would recommend one if that look is what you are looking for. Of course a Seekins or other modern rifle will be “better” from the standpoint of durability and weatherproofing but sometimes it is nice to use something that looks good.

It works too.

IMG_8981_Original.jpeg
IMG_3588_Original.jpeg
IMG_3651_Original.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estes640
Have an elk hunt coming this year and I want to just run a factory rifle.
I first wanted to just get a TIKKA in 300WSM and call it good since I've had several the past
10 years and I already know it is more than sufficient to the job.
However, I've been wanting a nice wood stock rifle for a while and was considering one of the newer Win Mod 70's.
I can find them in 270 and 300wsm.
can anybody attest to the late model Winchesters consistency and accuracy? Ill likely hand load it since it won't be a rifle I shoot
year-round and I already have all the primers and powder I need. I'm not really interested in anything else, and the whole idea
started as keeping the cost below $1,500.
Go for the Winchester.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sloporsche
It shoots heavier bullets at the same velocity as the 6.5 PRC, kicks less than the 7 or 300 PRC, puts sufficient energy for big game out to at least 800 yards. And shoots as flat or flatter. It's really a well-designed cartridge. I'd choose a 6 GT for PRS and 6.8 Western as an all-around long range hunting cartridge. Both work in short actions. Re bullet choices, I don't need a lot of choices, I need enough choices.

The 6.8 Western is what the WSMs should have been. What's the point in having a Magnum cartridge that can't handle high BC bullets?
Read section 4. The whole kinetic energy is old fuddlore.

 
Ohhhhh get a '06. I have a t3x Lam and like it lots. It's in 308. Bad shoulder stops me from anything that kicks harder. Since all the Tikka actions are long you may as well get the longer 06 and get couple hundred foot pounds more energy.
 
Ohhhhh get a '06. I have a t3x Lam and like it lots. It's in 308. Bad shoulder stops me from anything that kicks harder. Since all the Tikka actions are long you may as well get the longer 06 and get couple hundred foot pounds more energy.
Click the link in the post before yours. Foot pounds of energy doesn't matter.
 
So by your logic anyone hunting with something bigger than a creedmore is an idiot?
No, this was in response to people saying anything less than a pick your magnum was unethical. Projectiles and placement are what matter, not ft/lb energy. But as I've stated before, shoot what you like
 
  • Like
Reactions: tacoman69
No need for the new fancy cartridges, unless ya want one of them.
The old 30-06, 300WM, or 270 will all work, well, with ammo available in most elk camps.. in case you forgot your ammo at home, or lost it somewhere, out there.
I personally used the 7mm mag at first, but later went to the 338 WM for everything, as my personal choice, a better tool, for my style of hunting.
 
Holy F*ck, only 2 people in this thread can read?

Somebody please show me where the cartridge question was asked…

OP Winchester Model 70s are great rifles but no guarantees that factory ammo is going to shoot amazingly well. It seems you’re already planning to reload so it shouldn’t be much trouble to get it shooting well.

Have an elk hunt coming this year and I want to just run a factory rifle.
I first wanted to just get a TIKKA in 300WSM and call it good since I've had several the past
10 years and I already know it is more than sufficient to the job.
However, I've been wanting a nice wood stock rifle for a while and was considering one of the newer Win Mod 70's.
I can find them in 270 and 300wsm.
can anybody attest to the late model Winchesters consistency and accuracy? Ill likely hand load it since it won't be a rifle I shoot
year-round and I already have all the primers and powder I need. I'm not really interested in anything else, and the whole idea
started as keeping the cost below $1,500.

I’ve got a late model win70 supergrade maple 270…. Shoots lights out with factory hornady hunter. Beautiful rifle..

The poor bastard (OP) asked if anyone had experience with Winchester Model 70 with wood stock in 270 or 300WSM because THAT WAS THE ONLY THING HE WAS INTERESTED IN. One person answered correctly.

ETA: Ok, I finally made it thru all 3 pages of this vomit fest and there are at least 8 of you that can read. Congratulations!
 
Last edited:
Holy F*ck, only 2 people in this thread can read?

Somebody please show me where the cartridge question was asked…

OP Winchester Model 70s are great rifles but no guarantees that factory ammo is going to shoot amazingly well. It seems you’re already planning to reload so it shouldn’t be much trouble to get it shooting well.







ETA: Ok, I finally made it thru all 3 pages of this vomit fest and there are at least 8 of you that can read. Congratulations!
thanks for the response, I'm going to get a mod 70 sooner or later regardless of this year's hunt. I grew up hunting with my pops with a beautifule Mod 70 257 roberts that was a phenomenal rifle that ive been feeling nostalgic over since he past a couple years ago and have wanted to get another one since then. the more i think about it i think i really want to just do a 6 creed in one for hunting at home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moosemeat
Read section 4. The whole kinetic energy is old fuddlore.


I think you misunderstand the document. Kinetic energy is what causes tissue displacement... more energy, more displacement. That is why a 40gr Nosler Ballistic Tip out of a .220 Swift is a lot more explosive on a prairie dog than the same projectile fired from a .22 Hornet and traveling 1,200 ft/sec slower. Kinetic energy matters when it exceeds the elastic strength of the tissue it's fired into... again the difference in a headshot on a deer with a .22 LR and the .220 Swift is significant because in the latter case it exceeds the strength of the deer's skull to contain it and blows the skull apart while a .22 often doesn't exit. Similarly, something like a 6.8 Western with long VLD bullets that retain velocity and energy at longer ranges also retain more kinetic energy and the ability to create more tissue damage. Lung tissue is not elastically resilient, as anyone who has shot a deer through the lungs at close range with a high velocity centerfire hunting cartridge knows. For instance, I shot a 130 lb 18-month whitetail forkhorn broadside at 40 yards through the lungs and heart, using a .30-'06 150gr Remington factory Corelokt cartridge with a muzzle velocity of over 2950 ft/sec, passing completely through the chest cavity and blowing a silver dollar-sized hole out. While the heart had a good tear, it was substantially intact, as you'd expect from highly elastic muscle tissue. Both lungs were reduced to a liquid pulp with no structural integrity, like jello through a shredder. The deer ran about 25 yards, then collapsed and died, from blood loss and consequent lack of oxygen to the brain. A deer struck in the same spot by, say, a .38 Special 158gr HP bullet at 900 ft/sec would have mostly intact lungs, less heart damage, and the bullet likely wouldn't exit, and chances are it'd run a lot further before succumbing to blood loss.

Similarly, I had a roommate in college who drove an ice cream truck in New Orleans (this is back in 1980). He was robbed at gunpoint, complied, but remarked to the robber, "That's not a real gun, is it?" and was shot in response. The bullet, out of a .22 LR revolver, struck him through the chest, passed through his lung, and lodged in the muscle around his shoulder blade. My roommate jumped out of the truck and took off running down the street, collapsing a block away due to his inability to catch his breath (his lung collapsed). He made it to the hospital, went through surgery to fix his lung and remove the debris dragged inside him by the bullet, and the bullet was extracted. He was out of the hospital in less than a week. What do you think the outcome would have been if he had been shot with a 40gr .22 Nosler Ballistic Tip out of a .223, or a .220 Swift, in the identical spot? I think he would have dropped on the spot and died very shortly thereafter. The difference is, kinetic energy and the resultant difference in trauma.

That's why, for long range deer and elk hunting (beyond 500 yards), I'd choose the 6.8 Western over a .270 or 6.5 Creedmoor or PRC. YMMV. I actually have a 338 Win Mag that I use for elk, but it's a heavy rifle... not bad to shoot, but it takes me a couple of days of lugging it up and down the mountain to get used to it. I wouldn't mind something lighter but with less felt recoil and a flatter trajectory.
 
Last edited:
I think you misunderstand the document. Kinetic energy is what causes tissue displacement... more energy, more displacement. That is why a 40gr Nosler Ballistic Tip out of a .220 Swift is a lot more explosive on a prairie dog than the same projectile fired from a .22 Hornet and traveling 1,200 ft/sec slower. Kinetic energy matters when it exceeds the elastic strength of the tissue it's fired into... again the difference in a headshot on a deer with a .22 LR and the .220 Swift is significant because in the latter case it exceeds the strength of the deer's skull to contain it and blows the skull apart while a .22 often doesn't exit. Similarly, something like a 6.8 Western with long VLD bullets that retain velocity and energy at longer ranges also retain more kinetic energy and the ability to create more tissue damage. Lung tissue is not elastically resilient, as anyone who has shot a deer through the lungs at close range with a high velocity centerfire hunting cartridge knows. For instance, I shot a 130 lb 18-month whitetail forkhorn broadside at 40 yards through the lungs and heart, using a .30-'06 150gr Remington factory Corelokt cartridge with a muzzle velocity of over 2950 ft/sec, passing completely through the chest cavity and blowing a silver dollar-sized hole out. While the heart had a good tear, it was substantially intact, as you'd expect from highly elastic muscle tissue. Both lungs were reduced to a liquid pulp with no structural integrity, like jello through a shredder. The deer ran about 25 yards, then collapsed and died, from blood loss and consequent lack of oxygen to the brain. A deer struck in the same spot by, say, a .38 Special 158gr HP bullet at 900 ft/sec would have mostly intact lungs, less heart damage, and the bullet likely wouldn't exit, and chances are it'd run a lot further before succumbing to blood loss.

Similarly, I had a roommate in college who drove an ice cream truck in New Orleans (this is back in 1980). He was robbed at gunpoint, complied, but remarked to the robber, "That's not a real gun, is it?" and was shot in response. The bullet, out of a .22 LR revolver, struck him through the chest, passed through his lung, and lodged in the muscle around his shoulder blade. My roommate jumped out of the truck and took off running down the street, collapsing a block away due to his inability to catch his breath (his lung collapsed). He made it to the hospital, went through surgery to fix his lung and remove the debris dragged inside him by the bullet, and the bullet was extracted. He was out of the hospital in less than a week. What do you think the outcome would have been if he had been shot with a 40gr .22 Nosler Ballistic Tip out of a .223, or a .220 Swift, in the identical spot? I think he would have dropped on the spot and died very shortly thereafter. The difference is, kinetic energy and the resultant difference in trauma.

That's why, for long range deer and elk hunting (beyond 500 yards), I'd choose the 6.8 Western over a .270 or 6.5 Creedmoor or PRC. YMMV. I actually have a 338 Win Mag that I use for elk, but it's a heavy rifle... not bad to shoot, but it takes me a couple of days of lugging it up and down the mountain to get used to it. I wouldn't mind something lighter but with less felt recoil and a flatter trajectory.
No, I think my reading comprehension is pretty good. Fascinating story though
 
I think you misunderstand the document. Kinetic energy is what causes tissue displacement... more energy, more displacement. That is why a 40gr Nosler Ballistic Tip out of a .220 Swift is a lot more explosive on a prairie dog than the same projectile fired from a .22 Hornet and traveling 1,200 ft/sec slower. Kinetic energy matters when it exceeds the elastic strength of the tissue it's fired into... again the difference in a headshot on a deer with a .22 LR and the .220 Swift is significant because in the latter case it exceeds the strength of the deer's skull to contain it and blows the skull apart while a .22 often doesn't exit. Similarly, something like a 6.8 Western with long VLD bullets that retain velocity and energy at longer ranges also retain more kinetic energy and the ability to create more tissue damage. Lung tissue is not elastically resilient, as anyone who has shot a deer through the lungs at close range with a high velocity centerfire hunting cartridge knows. For instance, I shot a 130 lb 18-month whitetail forkhorn broadside at 40 yards through the lungs and heart, using a .30-'06 150gr Remington factory Corelokt cartridge with a muzzle velocity of over 2950 ft/sec, passing completely through the chest cavity and blowing a silver dollar-sized hole out. While the heart had a good tear, it was substantially intact, as you'd expect from highly elastic muscle tissue. Both lungs were reduced to a liquid pulp with no structural integrity, like jello through a shredder. The deer ran about 25 yards, then collapsed and died, from blood loss and consequent lack of oxygen to the brain. A deer struck in the same spot by, say, a .38 Special 158gr HP bullet at 900 ft/sec would have mostly intact lungs, less heart damage, and the bullet likely wouldn't exit, and chances are it'd run a lot further before succumbing to blood loss.

Similarly, I had a roommate in college who drove an ice cream truck in New Orleans (this is back in 1980). He was robbed at gunpoint, complied, but remarked to the robber, "That's not a real gun, is it?" and was shot in response. The bullet, out of a .22 LR revolver, struck him through the chest, passed through his lung, and lodged in the muscle around his shoulder blade. My roommate jumped out of the truck and took off running down the street, collapsing a block away due to his inability to catch his breath (his lung collapsed). He made it to the hospital, went through surgery to fix his lung and remove the debris dragged inside him by the bullet, and the bullet was extracted. He was out of the hospital in less than a week. What do you think the outcome would have been if he had been shot with a 40gr .22 Nosler Ballistic Tip out of a .223, or a .220 Swift, in the identical spot? I think he would have dropped on the spot and died very shortly thereafter. The difference is, kinetic energy and the resultant difference in trauma.

That's why, for long range deer and elk hunting (beyond 500 yards), I'd choose the 6.8 Western over a .270 or 6.5 Creedmoor or PRC. YMMV. I actually have a 338 Win Mag that I use for elk, but it's a heavy rifle... not bad to shoot, but it takes me a couple of days of lugging it up and down the mountain to get used to it. I wouldn't mind something lighter but with less felt recoil and a flatter trajectory.
swing and a miss