There is not one thing wrong with that. I totally get it taking a pile of shit and trying to make it fantastic, hell I was one of three idiots on this side of the ocean that road raced an Opel GT.....trust me I get it. And if you get joy from making something that is really not that great into something great more power to you, and you can do it without one single Bill 10 rounds is enough for anyone Ruger part if you wish.
But where I can't get on board is they are done to death, you really are doing nothing but bolting on parts. You are not figuring out anything for yourself, digging, researching, reaching out to people in other places of the world to find out why it is over heating, or shooting horrid. There is no real "work" on creation with it, you are not making anything. There is nothing special about it, nothing to stand it asides from all others.
As to the 60, I have 3-4 something like that. I have had that many 1022's in my life, and I have never had a 1022 OUT OF THE BOX that shot "better" tighter, more accurate....whatever then a 60, from new to so old there is no SN#. The 60 is a better rifle out of the box.
I dislike Ruger quite a bit, back to that bent barrel on christmas story I think I have told before. Done with that company. But I still just don't "get it" why the love for this thing, is it only because you can change it into something that should have been done years ago?