• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

3.090-inch 1000-yard group using a Savage Model 12 F-TR

Impossible. How did he even feed the first round into the chamber? Everybody knows they dont feed. After first shot, how did he extract the case? Everybody knows they dont extract. And dont even get me started on that trigger!

I was waiting to read that the barrel fell off also.

Damn Savages...
 
With 155's????

Well, it's certainly possible. The question is, can he do it again.... and again?

Sheer random chance dictates that this is feasible and should happen now and again. Also, plenty of rifles can 'mechanically' shoot 1/3rd MOA these days.

The difficulty comes when you add the external ballistics... at 1000 yards, making zero mistakes during 5 shots over several minutes on all your external variables -- critical with light 155 bullets. Then take into account your internal ballistic factors like barrel temp... is more than a bit difficult.

Not saying it didn't happen. It's an amazing group. The shooter did a heck of a job!

Cheers,

Sirhr

P.S. Maybe @Lowlight, who has a lot of experience at these ranges... more than me, certainly, can comment. If you do the ballistics holds using 155s at 1,000, the bullets are dropping in a ballistic arc from something like 16 feet above the target (this is from memory, so pardon my number here if it's off). If that's the case, shouldn't the bullet holes be a bit keyholed top-to-bottom as they will pass through the paper at a pretty sharp angle? Those holes look pretty straight-on to me. Again, not trying to say that this didn't happen. But it's pretty remarkable shooting for any gun and shooter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oneshot86
If you do the ballistics holds using 155s at 1,000, the bullets are dropping in a ballistic arc from something like 16 feet above the target (this is from memory, so pardon my number here if it's off). If that's the case, shouldn't the bullet holes be a bit keyholed top-to-bottom as they will pass through the paper at a pretty sharp angle? Those holes look pretty straight-on to me. Again, not trying to say that this didn't happen. But it's pretty remarkable shooting for any gun and shooter.


If you do the math for that load it's closer to 9.5 feet... and that 'peak' is somewhere around 600 yards. 9.5 feet, over 400yds, is a pretty shallow angle - enough that it's be almost impossible to visually 'tell' from looking at the target up close and in person, much less from a photo over the Internet...
 
If you do the math for that load it's closer to 9.5 feet... and that 'peak' is somewhere around 600 yards. 9.5 feet, over 400yds, is a pretty shallow angle - enough that it's be almost impossible to visually 'tell' from looking at the target up close and in person, much less from a photo over the Internet...
But that's not how Bugs Bunny does it! ;)
 
With 155's????

Well, it's certainly possible. The question is, can he do it again.... and again?

Sheer random chance dictates that this is feasible and should happen now and again. Also, plenty of rifles can 'mechanically' shoot 1/3rd MOA these days.

The difficulty comes when you add the external ballistics... at 1000 yards, making zero mistakes during 5 shots over several minutes on all your external variables -- critical with light 155 bullets. Then take into account your internal ballistic factors like barrel temp... is more than a bit difficult.

Not saying it didn't happen. It's an amazing group. The shooter did a heck of a job!

Cheers,

Sirhr

P.S. Maybe @Lowlight, who has a lot of experience at these ranges... more than me, certainly, can comment. If you do the ballistics holds using 155s at 1,000, the bullets are dropping in a ballistic arc from something like 16 feet above the target (this is from memory, so pardon my number here if it's off). If that's the case, shouldn't the bullet holes be a bit keyholed top-to-bottom as they will pass through the paper at a pretty sharp angle? Those holes look pretty straight-on to me. Again, not trying to say that this didn't happen. But it's pretty remarkable shooting for any gun and shooter.

They demo'd this in the Art of the Precision Rifle Magpul videos. They placed two large frame paper targets at 1k or 1mi(?) about 10'-20' apart and measured the drop angle between the holes the bullet made in the front and back targets....it was a pretty shallow angle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
Hi,

Well Hell....Choate stock sales just went through the roof lolol

Sincerely,
Theis

I have a Choate stock on my M700 Varmint. One of the Plaster-designed "Ulltimate Sniper" stocks. It is neither.

That said, it took a rifle that would shoot dimes one day... and then would not hit a thing the next, because the wood stock was so flexible that a few degrees of temperature drop or humidity would walk its POI all over the place. I put a Choate stock on it and it turned into a a tack driver that has never needed a scope adjustment in 20 years.

It's a heavy stock. Not especially pretty or ergonomic. But it does shoot. It is about a perfect varmint stock!!!

Oh and I love John Plaster... Even if the term 'ultimate' is a bit.... generous.
pierce with Major Plaster at Gastonia.jpg


His book, though a bit dated, is IMHO required reading for folks here.

Cheers,

Sirhr
 
With 155's????

Well, it's certainly possible. The question is, can he do it again.... and again?

Sheer random chance dictates that this is feasible and should happen now and again. Also, plenty of rifles can 'mechanically' shoot 1/3rd MOA these days.

The difficulty comes when you add the external ballistics... at 1000 yards, making zero mistakes during 5 shots over several minutes on all your external variables -- critical with light 155 bullets. Then take into account your internal ballistic factors like barrel temp... is more than a bit difficult.

Not saying it didn't happen. It's an amazing group. The shooter did a heck of a job!

Cheers,

Sirhr

P.S. Maybe @Lowlight, who has a lot of experience at these ranges... more than me, certainly, can comment. If you do the ballistics holds using 155s at 1,000, the bullets are dropping in a ballistic arc from something like 16 feet above the target (this is from memory, so pardon my number here if it's off). If that's the case, shouldn't the bullet holes be a bit keyholed top-to-bottom as they will pass through the paper at a pretty sharp angle? Those holes look pretty straight-on to me. Again, not trying to say that this didn't happen. But it's pretty remarkable shooting for any gun and shooter.


Lol, if hed shot the record with a custom 6.5 CM, would your post have been this winded?
 
Probably... because even a 6.5 in 1/3rd moa requires some remarkable skill or some remarkable luck to shoot a 3" group at 1000.

It's simply a matter of mechanical repeatability (ie some amazing internal ballistics) and some really, really amazing external ballistics... in other words, estimation of a number of factors over several minutes... to bring in a group that tight.

I never said not possible. I did say that it's a really challenging to do... and probably very, very hard to repeat.

6.5... .300 WM... 308... whatever. It's still an amazing feat. And if you want to go with the concept of monkeys and Shakespeare... you have a winner.

The shooter should be commended. It's an extraordinary accomplishment. And, daresay, a hard-to-repeat one. That does not take away from the fact that he was in the right place, at the right time, with the right equipment and... some good luck. To make a record-shot.

But to make it a 'skill' vs. a good day... I'd say that he should repeat it a few times. Otherwise, it is a record-breaking anomaly.. But still a broken record!

Cheers,

Sirhr
 
Lots of F standard guys running hot loads with 155 Bergers doing great at 1k all round the world. High
2900s with 2208 ( Varget ) powder, plenty of velocity left at target. It’s agood reality check of your wind
skills, especially after shooting high BC anything else...
 
Every so often the moons align and all those rounds that would normally shoot into 8 or 24 inches will come together into a once in a lifetime grouping. World records for the most part have luck involved, top shooters will have better groups when an average is taken of their targets and have a better chance of a record group. I think it's cool this happened, will be a moment he'll never forget but just as easily get at the bottom of the score sheet next time.

Toostrap
 
With 155's????

Well, it's certainly possible. The question is, can he do it again.... and again?

Sheer random chance dictates that this is feasible and should happen now and again. Also, plenty of rifles can 'mechanically' shoot 1/3rd MOA these days.

The difficulty comes when you add the external ballistics... at 1000 yards, making zero mistakes during 5 shots over several minutes on all your external variables -- critical with light 155 bullets. Then take into account your internal ballistic factors like barrel temp... is more than a bit difficult.

Not saying it didn't happen. It's an amazing group. The shooter did a heck of a job!

Cheers,

Sirhr

P.S. Maybe @Lowlight, who has a lot of experience at these ranges... more than me, certainly, can comment. If you do the ballistics holds using 155s at 1,000, the bullets are dropping in a ballistic arc from something like 16 feet above the target (this is from memory, so pardon my number here if it's off). If that's the case, shouldn't the bullet holes be a bit keyholed top-to-bottom as they will pass through the paper at a pretty sharp angle? Those holes look pretty straight-on to me. Again, not trying to say that this didn't happen. But it's pretty remarkable shooting for any gun and shooter.

I’ve got a very accurate 308 AR rifle that I’ve shot at 1000 yards quite a lot since I’ve got access to a 1000 yard pasture range. I shoot 150 smk s Granted I can’t do anything like this kind of grouping, but I’ve never noticed anything but round holes in the paper at 1000yds. And my loads I’m sure are slower than his. The group is certainly possible but it couldn’t be duplicated by him anytime soon. The fact is that if you shoot enough at 1000 yards you will eventually get an amazing group some where down the line. He can’t duplicate it nor should he have to. If all records had to be duplicated to get into the books none of them would be records.
 
Um, 15-60x Vortex riflescope? :eek:o_O I’m sure it’s possible. Could be in an area with virtually no wind, with all the right weather variables, got lucky, etc. and was on bench. Don’t even get me started on benchrest stuff lol. To me that takes all of the skill out as from that standpoint it’s really all about how good you are at loading and how well your rifle was built. Haha.

Truthfully, I don’t care too much about my groups at distance. As long as it hits the target I’m good to go.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
Um, 15-60x Vortex riflescope? :eek:o_O I’m sure it’s possible. Could be in an area with virtually no wind, with all the right weather variables, got lucky, etc. and was on bench. Don’t even get me started on benchrest stuff lol. To me that takes all of the skill out as from that standpoint it’s really all about how good you are at loading and how well your rifle was built. Haha.

Truthfully, I don’t care too much about my groups at distance. As long as it hits the target I’m good to go.

Benchrest shooting as like any other rifle shooting competition. The wind will screw you every time. Skill is still required. Atleast to be competitive.
I agree heavygun classes are more of a reloading contest. Free recoil shooting isnt really shooting
 
  • Like
Reactions: SilentStalkr
Lots of F standard guys running hot loads with 155 Bergers doing great at 1k all round the world. High
2900s with 2208 ( Varget ) powder, plenty of velocity left at target. It’s agood reality check of your wind
skills, especially after shooting high BC anything else...
The guy that got me started in LR won more than a few NRA HP matches with 155 Lapua Scenars stuffed in a case full of Varget, his rifle was built on a long action because the barrel was throated so long that he barely got the base of the 155 seated in the case. His 30” long 14 twist pushed the 155’s at 2975.
 
I have a Choate stock on my M700 Varmint. One of the Plaster-designed "Ulltimate Sniper" stocks. It is neither.

That said, it took a rifle that would shoot dimes one day... and then would not hit a thing the next, because the wood stock was so flexible that a few degrees of temperature drop or humidity would walk its POI all over the place. I put a Choate stock on it and it turned into a a tack driver that has never needed a scope adjustment in 20 years.

It's a heavy stock. Not especially pretty or ergonomic. But it does shoot. It is about a perfect varmint stock!!!

Oh and I love John Plaster... Even if the term 'ultimate' is a bit.... generous.

Cheers,

Sirhr

I picked up a new Savage Hog Hunter 308 last month to help control the feral hogs on our place. It shot a 1/2" group at 200 yards with a hand load I lucked into early, but the flimsy plastic stock made doing that consistently very difficult. Installed a Choate sniper stock last week because I found one on the interweb for $165 shipped and figured its worth trying at that price. I was invited to a 1000 yard range last Thursday, Got lucky and hit a 11" steel plate on the first shot at 1000, then shot a 4" high x 10" wide four shot group. This is my first savage and my first Choate stock, but needless to say, I'm sold on both. Got about $1100 in it total, including a Vortex Viper 6.5x20-50 PA scope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirhrmechanic
I had a 7.62x39 AR-15, it put 5 rounds of Wold steel case through one hole at 100 yards. When I got home i heard something rattling, and the scope was about to fall off of it. Neither it nor the ammo ever shot another half inch group. i guess maybe I should have left the scope loose. :ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO:

Crazy good shooting, congrats on the record.