Which is better for functioning and quality of videos not worried about price
- Thread starter Ron Guesanburu
- Start date
Ok thanks
I have triggercam 2.1. Really happy with the quality and results.
Quick edit. On the vortex strike eagle 2, it works great. You can see the difference in glass quality. On a loopy mk5hd the mag throw lever does touch the bottom front of the triggercam, so you have to pull the trigger cam back slightly. Annoying, but worth noting. Other scopes have been no issue.
Quick edit. On the vortex strike eagle 2, it works great. You can see the difference in glass quality. On a loopy mk5hd the mag throw lever does touch the bottom front of the triggercam, so you have to pull the trigger cam back slightly. Annoying, but worth noting. Other scopes have been no issue.
Feniks Technologies
Premium Ammunition and Loading Supplies
Supporter
Commercial Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Feniks Technologies
Premium Ammunition and Loading Supplies
Supporter
Commercial Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Nedved shooting supplies. They may have one in stock. If not, they have rolling orders. So there’s always some on the way.
Thanks it just seems to me that the triggercam has better quality of videos than the other one from what I've seen on videos
Go to there web site and pick your state and find one
Awesome thanks
I have a Triggercam 2.1 basically rand new I'm looking to sell if anyone is interested
How much?
I have a Triggercam 2.1, it pisses me off... Not very impressed.
- As soon as you turn it on, it begins filming
- My iPhone doesn't like talking to it unless I'm on aeroplane mode
- Often I (and others using it) stop filming when they wanted to start filming, it's difficult to tell what's going on without the app
- Mine shit itself last week, it was frozen, had to plug it in and after about 10 minutes it finally settled down?
- The little metal discs that protect the focus ring and power / output / card ports are finicky
- It comes with a tonne of shims, with no markings, changing scopes constantly you have to be paying attention to get the right one
- It took me a bit to get it to focus (the app vs PC screen are very different I have found)
Overall, I'd like to love it... But, it's just not great right now I think. Not $900+ AUD good.
- As soon as you turn it on, it begins filming
- My iPhone doesn't like talking to it unless I'm on aeroplane mode
- Often I (and others using it) stop filming when they wanted to start filming, it's difficult to tell what's going on without the app
- Mine shit itself last week, it was frozen, had to plug it in and after about 10 minutes it finally settled down?
- The little metal discs that protect the focus ring and power / output / card ports are finicky
- It comes with a tonne of shims, with no markings, changing scopes constantly you have to be paying attention to get the right one
- It took me a bit to get it to focus (the app vs PC screen are very different I have found)
Overall, I'd like to love it... But, it's just not great right now I think. Not $900+ AUD good.
Lucky i got mine for $660 aud.
The focus thing is a bit dicky to get used to, and yea the shims need some sort od number or compatibility guide/list provided, but thats really a non issue.
As for film at turn on. I dont have that and wish i did. Setting somewhere ?
The focus thing is a bit dicky to get used to, and yea the shims need some sort od number or compatibility guide/list provided, but thats really a non issue.
As for film at turn on. I dont have that and wish i did. Setting somewhere ?
triggercam has the best video quality .
I got a Triggercam 2.1 from Nedved a few days ago. Haven't messed with it, yet. Hoping to set it up next week.
Triggercam does add a glass lens infront of your eye. It does effect vision. Its minimal, but its there..
It doesnt turn a tier 1 scope into some 30+ year old junker, however it does have an effect because its there.
It doesnt turn a tier 1 scope into some 30+ year old junker, however it does have an effect because its there.
I also have both - Tactacam and Triggercam.
I prefer the Triggercam. It provides a better picture quality to the eye and to the video.
I have just compiled a video comparing both cameras in real environment.
Both cameras were set with the same parameters for resolution and frames per second.
I prefer the Triggercam. It provides a better picture quality to the eye and to the video.
I have just compiled a video comparing both cameras in real environment.
Both cameras were set with the same parameters for resolution and frames per second.
