Tango Fire 4000 - CDF not implemented - coming soon?

[Moose_]

I noticed my ballistic solutions between AB quantum and the TF4000 were slightly off. When investigating the issue (emailed both Tango innos and AB), it was pointed out that although CDF for ballistic profiles is available in the engine used by the TF4000, it is not implemented yet.
HOWEVER - i asked Tango Innos about it, they said the implementation is coming by October!! Hopefully this stays true, kinda frustrating to range something and then have to think about taking a .1 - .2 off of the solution that it's spitting out.

 

[JM4590]

I don’t think that adding CDF to the equation will fix the issue. If you are seeing impact shifts of .1-.2 at 1000 yds how can you be sure it’s not something else? In real world shooting IMHO .1-.2 at 1000yds is negligible. Shooting steel at MOST matches and at MOST ranges that difference is still an impact. Glad they are offering it up, but is it really necessary?

 

[Moose_]

I don’t think that adding CDF to the equation will fix the issue. If you are seeing impact shifts of .1-.2 at 1000 yds how can you be sure it’s not something else? In real world shooting IMHO .1-.2 at 1000yds is negligible. Shooting steel at MOST matches and at MOST ranges that difference is still an impact. Glad they are offering it up, but is it really necessary?

It’s not impact shifts, it’s the ballistic solution it’s giving me vs the trued data AB quantum gives me.