• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Argument Against Supplements

jps24

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 29, 2012
21
0
34
Fargo, ND
I posted this in a different topic, but figured I would start a new one to get this info out there. I explain where I got my info and experience from, so I'm not making this stuff up.

Figured I would throw my 2 cents in on this one. Up front, all my following information is coming from articles and training plans written by Mark Twight, the founder of Gym Jones on their membership site. Also my own limited experiences in dealing with exceptional officers in the Army and passing SFAS. I have followed Gym Jones programming for a few years and read all of their articles dealing with dieting and supplements. If you haven't heard of them, their legitimacy comes from training the '300 movie' actors (no it wasnt CGI), professional athletes to incluse MMA/Judo, and elite Special Forces operators.

First, a supplement is only there in essence because your diet sucks. If you ate correctly, a supplement to your diet would not be needed. So eating correctly for your goal is the first and best step towards progress. Unless your goal is to be a freak Olympic power lifter or world class weight lifter like Ronnie Coleman, you are able to get all the protein from a regular diet. Even an athlete only needs 1.5g of protein per kg of body wieght. Any more protein taken in, and you are only pissing it straight out. Furthermore, studies have been conducted that show that athletes who consistently train require less protein over time. As they start let's say a 3 month training program, they require more protein in the first 3 weeks. But after that, their body adapts to using the protein more efficiently and they require less even though their training gets harder as they progress in the program. Again, all from Mark Twight.

Secondly, after reading many articles on the membership Gym Jones site, every one of their athletes used supplements at one time to test them out, but all of their results were the same: they did not give them more of an advantage than eating healthy/regularly. Therefore, they are a waste of money. The only 'supplements' they said worked were fatty oil pills such as Fish Oil pills or CLA pills. These pills help give your diet healthy fat to use which helps with concentration and join health.

However, supplements can be helpful in some occasions. For example, let's say you couldnt eat lunch or dinner on a training day. Using it as a meal replacement would suffice as your diet is lacking that day. Thats really only when they should be used, or you are only wasting your money.

Devotion to a healthy diet will save you plenty of money by not wasting it on supplements. It will also give you better results. Talk with yourself as to what your goals are. Then create a diet and training plan to achieve those goals. Are you trying to put on muscle mass or gain weight? Lose weight? Maintain? Focusing on strength, power, or endurance? All of these affect diet and training. A healthy diet would include eating carbs, fats, and proteins at every meal. But every meal should be limited to no more than 500-700 calories. Any more than that and the extra calories will be stored as fat. Eat 5 meals a day like that and you are totally fine and have plenty of energy for even the most strenuous workouts, trust me. I worked out 3-4 hours a day on no more than 1000 calories/day for 3 weeks straight, but thats only because my goals were different. And guess what? My times and weights still improved. No supplements required.

Just my thoughts about this. Different strokes for different folks.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

I think your points make sense until I got to the calorie part. 1000 calories per day? How much do you weigh? 3-4 hrs of working out per day on 1000cal per day for 3 weeks is a straight up crash diet in my book. I know you said your goals were different but I'm curious as to what they were. 1000 cal per day and working out 3-4 hrs a day is a prescription for overuse injuries due to poor recovery and eventually anorexia. Did you suffer any nagging injuries/tweaks during that period?
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

Quote "Up front, all my following information is coming from articles and training plans written by Mark Twight, the founder of Gym Jones"


Problem with getting all your information from one side can be a little biased,

Quote "I worked out 3-4 hours a day on no more than 1000 calories/day for 3 weeks straight, but thats only because my goals were different. And guess what? My times and weights still improved. No supplements required."

Really?? Lol I just can't see that. 1000 cal and your body is starving if your a normal person, let alone someone traing 3 to 4 hrs a day. My Gawd son where in the heck do you find the time to train that many hours everyday?

The lap band patients are on 1000 cal diet and have you seen the way they look...they have no muscle! Some of the fattest people I know are on 1000 cal diets and train like crazy. Unless your 18 to 25 where your hormones are at an all time high.....this is not feasible for the avg joe.

Maybe you had a good response on the cal restricted and long training sessions for the first month but eventually you will not be able to sustain this type of diet with your training with out doing damage to your body.

Anyway, just giving some dialogue to your post not trying to be a PIA
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

I know that it can be done without supplements. However, trying to eat 3500 calories a day divided by 7 meals is tuff to do. With all of that eating I found it hard to work that into my schedule, so supplements do have there place. I hate fish oil burps, so I use flax seed cold pressed oil instead. As others have said 1000 calories a day and working out 3-4 hours a day is nuts.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

Kinda beating a dead horse at this point, but what exactly are your goals that justify eating only 1000 calories per day? what is your height/weight/age/sex? Without any background information, it sounds like you are starving your body.

I am 21, 5'7, 140# and my goals of course are to gain muscle mass. I go to the gym and do split-part training 3-4 days a week, typically an hour to an hour and a half each workout. My situation is a little different, since I have only about 1/2 of my small intestines, but I try to eat around 3500 calories per day on training days, and when trying to consume that much with a busy schedule, supplements are a must for me.

Also, it should be pointed out that you are focusing on dietary supplements. Those are entirely different from what comes to mind when you just say supplements.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

My response to your questions/counter-arguments and defense of my original post:

I am a 22 year old cadet at West Point Military Academy, so it is probably a correct statement to say that my hormones are always kicked in, haha. Yes, I do follow Gym Jones and Mark Twight programming and that is where a lot of info came from. His information is obtained from over 20 years of teaching/coaching, and he also cites other nutrionists, olympic athletes, etc in his work. Im sorry that I cannot show you these documents because only members can access them. However, I also stated that I gained knowledge from exceptional officers and mentors here at the academy. My mentors are mostly Special Forces officers and they helped me attend and pass Special Forces Assessment and Selection two years ago. So cumulatively, my info came from all of those sources.

As for the 1000 calorie/day training plan I was on a few months ago for roughly 3 weeks: My goal out of this plan was not to develop physically but rather test myself mentally. I will attend some pretty rough Army schools in the future if I continue on my current path, so I wanted to know how I would handle an extremely limited diet with high work output. My goal was to keep going for as many days as I could with working out 5 days straight and resting on the weekends all while eating anywhere between 900-1200 calories a day depending on workout intensity. I stopped at roughly the 3 week mark as I started to suffer in my classes and severe headaches set in. But that was my goal, I wanted to see how long I could go before it seriously hurt my mental capacity. The end result was that I learned what I could handle and what it felt like. I became mentally stronger from that test, and after recording my workouts and eating habits during that period, I also saw that my physical performance did not suffer but rather continued to improve until probably 2 days before I quit the program when it took a sharp drop. I do realize that in the long run if I extended this program, it definitely would have been detrimental to my overall health.

I hope this helps clear things up a little bit. I still stand by my claim that if an exact program is properly followed by correct eating, supplements are not required.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

My definition of supplements includes:

Pre-Workout:
such products as 'increased fat burning pills'
increased energy pills/drinks

Post Workout:
protein supplements to build muscle such as 'Amplified Wheybolic Extreme' and all of those infinite other products who claim to accomplish the same

The only 'supplements' my sources I listed previously and myself have found to work are fish oil or CLA pills. These are fatty supplement pills, to be specific Omega-3 fat acids. They help with maintaining joint health and increasing mental concentration.

The reason I believe supplements don't work is that they are produced, they are not natural. A 'protein powder' is not actually protein, it is manufactured protein.

My point in bringing up the 1000 calorie/day program is to bring across a point that supplements are not required to be stronger/faster. After those 3 weeks, I continued the same workout program but gradually worked up to roughly 2000-2500 calories/day, which is the current amount of calories I take in a day. My times and weights have continued to improve at the exact pace the program wants them to.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I hope this helps clear things up a little bit. I still stand by my claim that if an exact program is properly followed by correct eating, supplements are not required. </div></div>

That did clear it up. I agree with your statement BUT when you get into real world living with kids, wife, and work obligations unfortunately eating perfectly can get compromised. That's where supplements can provide a nice safety net to help keep you healthy and injury free.

My overall training priorities are:
1. Training (never miss a workout unless an injury forces you to)
2. Sleep 8-10 hrs
3. food... nothing with a label on it, fresh meat and veggies

If life gets in the way, I skimp on my food ideals first, sleep second, and lastly I'll let life/injuries interrupt a training session.

Your story about starving yourself to see how you'll react is intense man. Intense in a Dr. Bruce Banner/Dr. Jekyl kind of way. I like that you said you did the experiment just to see how you would react... that scientific curiosity will take you places. I think it's a cool trait.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

I think JJones needs to look at this because he would do a better job at answering than I would, but, if you think "'protein powder' is not actually protein, it is manufactured protein." you need to read a little about where whey protein comes from.

 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you haven't heard of them, their legitimacy comes from training the '300 movie' actors (no it wasnt CGI) </div></div>

The fact that you hold those guys builds in high regard almost caused me to stop reading.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">First, a supplement is only there in essence because your diet sucks. If you ate correctly, a supplement to your diet would not be needed. </div></div>

Please enlighten us as to which foods increase testosterone production above natural levels.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Unless your goal is to be a freak Olympic power lifter or world class weight lifter like Ronnie Coleman</div></div>

Guess I want to be a freak. But I could say the same for people who go the gym and never work hard enough to move real weight.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Secondly, after reading many articles on the membership Gym Jones site, every one of their athletes used supplements at one time to test them out, but all of their results were the same: they did not give them more of an advantage </div></div>

By your reasoning, "I had a .308 that wouldn't shoot better than 1.5 MOA, so .308's suck."

You do realize that there are tens of thousands of supplements available, right? It would be impossible for such a limited test pool to evaluate them all.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Devotion to diet will also give you results. </div></div>

I agree with you here.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Talk with yourself as to what your goals are. Then create a diet and training plan to achieve those goals. </div></div>

This states perfectly what is wrong with your post. You have no idea what body types, or what goals, the people reading your post have. Your advice is for a narrow target audience and it totally bogus for some people.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">But every meal should be limited to no more than 500-700 calories. Any more than that and the extra calories will be stored as fat. Eat 5 meals a day like that and you are totally fine and have plenty of energy for even the most strenuous workouts, trust me. </div></div>

Arthur Jones and Casey Viator would disagree. I do too. I eat 1000+ calories 5-7 times a day. I have 15% BF.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I worked out 3-4 hours a day on no more than 1000 calories/day for 3 weeks straight </div></div>

That is the problem, Homie! You are delusional from lack of nutrition.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

first of all , everybody has differant nutritional needs according to their goals.

the idea that an athlete only needs 1.5g or protein per KG of body weight is retarded , you follow that regiment you are destin to be a "skinny/fat" midget , 1.5g of protein per pound is alot better option. Its like saying that carbohydrates are essential to
muscle growth , it's utter bullshit!!

as far as "manufactured" protein , I'm guessing that you
mean processed as almost all proteins come from plant or animal matter , the most common is Whey and that is processed out of milk , egg protein is processed out of real eggs and the same for beef , soy , pea , rice and everything else.

a common macro nutrient ratio is 33-33-33%, If your base calorie needs are 3000 then you need 1000 cals from protein , carbs and fat , that would be 250g Protein , 250g carbs and 111cals from fat.

I personally follow close to a 50-30-20 ratio at 5000 cals in the off season when I'm trying to grow , basically 80g protein , 50g carbs and 18-20g fat per meal , at this ratio it allows me to train with high intensity for 45-60 min every other day and 10 min HIT cardio , I'm able to stay in the 10-12% body fat range here. Now not only is it hard to choke down that much food but it's also expensive so "supplemental shakes" are used not because I'm lacking the nutrition or my diet sucks just simply because my stomach can't always process that high volume of food where it's mush easier to drink a 20oz shake and eat a pound of pineapple rather that 1/2 pound of chicken , 1/2 pound of
beef and 12oz sweet potatoes. I don't have any loss in energy , power , size or definition when I replace 3 meals with shakes.

rather that spend so much time reading bullshit out dated articles you should spend more time figuring out what works for you!!

next thing you'll be telling us that fruit makes you fat and and whole eggs and red meat give you high cholesterol
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My response to your questions/counter-arguments and defense of my original post:

I am a 22 year old cadet at West Point Military Academy, so it is probably a correct statement to say that my hormones are always kicked in, haha. Yes, I do follow Gym Jones and Mark Twight programming and that is where a lot of info came from. His information is obtained from over 20 years of teaching/coaching, and he also cites other nutrionists, olympic athletes, etc in his work. Im sorry that I cannot show you these documents because only members can access them. However, I also stated that I gained knowledge from exceptional officers and mentors here at the academy. My mentors are mostly Special Forces officers and they helped me attend and pass Special Forces Assessment and Selection two years ago. So cumulatively, my info came from all of those sources.

As for the 1000 calorie/day training plan I was on a few months ago for roughly 3 weeks: My goal out of this plan was not to develop physically but rather test myself mentally. I will attend some pretty rough Army schools in the future if I continue on my current path, so I wanted to know how I would handle an extremely limited diet with high work output. My goal was to keep going for as many days as I could with working out 5 days straight and resting on the weekends all while eating anywhere between 900-1200 calories a day depending on workout intensity. I stopped at roughly the 3 week mark as I started to suffer in my classes and severe headaches set in. But that was my goal, I wanted to see how long I could go before it seriously hurt my mental capacity. The end result was that I learned what I could handle and what it felt like. I became mentally stronger from that test, and after recording my workouts and eating habits during that period, I also saw that my physical performance did not suffer but rather continued to improve until probably 2 days before I quit the program when it took a sharp drop. I do realize that in the long run if I extended this program, it definitely would have been detrimental to my overall health.

I hope this helps clear things up a little bit. I still stand by my claim that if an exact program is properly followed by correct eating, supplements are not required. </div></div>



I'm trying to figure out what you were thinking with this experiment. First, it absolutely does not correlate to the military schools you have in mind (the Q, Ranger, sere, etc). You are a student not in a feild environment, not subjected the the kind of stresses these schools will induce. It's just not an experiment that will give results like the schools you are thinking about. All you were really doing is starving yourself for the sake of starving yourself. There is no way to induce the amount of physical output, sleep deprivation and food deprivation you experiance in some of these situations, so you are not really testing how you react to it. You simply cannot replicate it on your own. And certainly not while attending any sort of academic schooling

Onto your supplement stuff- I think you need to widen your prospective... Not that you are entirely off base, but your ideas are so narrow that you aren't considering the vast amount of other situations to which your ideas do not apply
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

DP425,

the idea for my 3 week training plan to build more mental toughness came from this blog post on Barefoot Fitness.

http://barefootfts.com/blog/your-brain-on-stress

Here is a quick summary but I still urge you to read the whole article:

SF guys are able to cope with stress better than the average person. This is a result of higher levels NPY amino acids in the brain. Not everyone is born with the same amounts of those amino acids, but they can be built if you put yourself in stressful situations, namely mental stress which many times accompanies physical stress.

So for me, restricting my diet while maintaining my workout program put me in a very uncomfortable, stressful mental state as I hoped to build more of these amino acids by testing myself.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">DP425,
So for me, restricting my diet while maintaining my workout program put me in a very uncomfortable, stressful mental state as I hoped to build more of these amino acids by testing myself. </div></div>

What I am saying is, given your environment and situation, you cannot possibly replicate the stresses induced by the schools and training you are thinking of.

But I supposed experimenting with the idea isn't really a bad thing.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

Some quotes from Gym Jones in an article dealing with Supplements and Post-Workout Recovery Eating:

"Supplement manufacturers want to sell their products. Formulas aimed at the pre-workout time period, the post-workout (recovery) period, and supplemental protein are among the best selling products in this market. I've eaten, drunk, and pissed away tens of thousands of dollars worth of supplements over the years. Some have proven useful, others are a f*cking pipe dream, pushed on us using the fear and shame marketing technique. Yes, some supplements are useful. But supplements are supplemental to a nutrient-rich, and calorically-adequate diet. They are not "necessary." Real food has lots of good stuff in it.

With that out of the way let me say that my muscles are not "screaming for nutritional support" after every single workout no matter how short or long, and regardless of intensity. Do I really need a 500-calorie recovery shake after I lifted six singles at 90% of 1RM and left the gym? Is that same 500-calorie protein-dominant shake, which promises increased muscle mass, appropriate after I ride my bike 100 miles, up the hill and back down to the dale? The sarcasm as well as the answers should be obvious.

On the other hand proper nourishment speeds recovery, which allows an increase in training frequency. Poor eating habits reduce the ability to swiftly recover."

As for recovery drinks:

"Chocolate milk also fits the 3:1 profile and in one study it outperformed one of the most popular recovery formulas. If using chocolate milk drink a low-fat variety and (maybe) avoid those with high fructose corn syrup, though the HFCS issue is open to some debate.

Ideal caloric intake depends on the intensity and duration of the effort, among other things. If one begins training with relatively full glycogen stores then a short, intense workout (10-20 minute) doesn’t require much more than water during the 20-30 minute recovery window. A 60-120 minute session at constant, moderate intensity should be addressed with 50g carbohydrates (200 calories) and 12-13g of protein (50 calories) . The most effective intake to replace muscle glycogen following long, endurance-oriented sessions (>120 minutes) is 225g of carbohydrates, which is a lot of calories. It’s hard to earn them."

Define to yourself what type of 'engine' you want, and base calorie sources and amounts off of it:

"Recently I happened on a blog where someone asked, "if he knows so much about training why ain't he swole?" The question referred to my height and weight, or perhaps to the fact that my head is still proportional to the rest of my body. There followed some other self-congratulatory comments about being "yoked up" made by individuals who equate muscle size with fitness. Size is indeed the definition of fitness used by many but different standards abound, and - happily - one size does not fit all.

Do you know why you train? Have you ever defined your goals, precisely? True fitness, which is different from the appearance of fitness, generally comes down to the power plant. Do you need a big and pretty engine, a powerful engine, or perhaps a big gas tank? The answer depends entirely on the objective.

The solely pretty engine is - for the most part - functionally useless outside the context of getting laid. Plenty of guys have built pretty engines by strapping themselves to machines in the gym. When it comes to stepping on the gas in sport or at work they often look like Tarzan but play like Jane."

All of the words in quotes are not mine, they were written by Mark Twight and/or Rob MacDonald. True fitness is much more than just picking stuff up and putting it down.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

+1 for cavemanmoore, if you have ever read any of the industry magazines put out by IDEA, ACE, or any other training federation, supplements are an integral part of a training routine, true they may fill in the gaps with a deficient diet, but thats what vitamins are for, supplements can give you that added edge over just diet alone, i guess it just depends on what your training goals are
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I still stand by my claim that if an exact program is properly followed by correct eating, supplements are not required. </div></div>

This is because you are ignorant to the fact that not everyone has the same goals as you do.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My goal out of this plan was not to develop physically </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">True fitness is much more than just picking stuff up and putting it down. </div></div>

The high level of "fitness" that you are developing will serve you well while pursing the sport of chess.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

haha, I will have to try my hand at chess sometime in the near future to see if I'm any better. To reiterate, I only did that plan for 3 weeks during November 2011, I am no longer on it but have moved on to 'High Level Foundation' programs and will be moving on to other ones once I finish this 3 month program. My personal goals are to maximize my power to weight ratio because I believe that my job requires that type of fitness. I'm not saying my numbers are anything special, but I feel that I am in progress for a solid high level base in all around fitness:

Body weight: 165#
Pullups: 16 dead hang
1RM Deadlift: 365#
1RM Overhead Squat: 135#
1RM Front Squat: 250#
1RM Power Clean: 195#
1RM Jerk: 165#
1RM Snatch: 130#
Row 500m: 1:35 minutes
Row 2000m: 7:30 minutes
2 mile run: 12:20 minutes
Half Marathon: 1:40 hours
Row 5000m: 20:00 minutes

Even if your goals are to lift the biggest weight or have the biggest arms, etc. I offer this beast to you and he accomplished all of this without supplements:

http://gymjones.com/gym/disciple/3/
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

I agree with WhiskeyWebber in that fact that with the regular rigors of life, generally it isn't the easiest to maintain the "perfect" diet. Add on top of that, deployments, and you find yourself in a difficult fitness/diet situation. As much as I believe that a healthy diet is the cornerstone to overall peak fitness and health; I find that supplements do indeed play a valuable roll when time constraints and available food items don't adhere to the body's needs. If only it were a perfect world.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

Whey protein comes from dairy.
Soy protein from plants is no good as it lacks essential amino acids.

Most supplements are garbage and manufactured in utah because of the laws there. No FDA approval on any of it.

Having said that, tge big name manufacturers are legit.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jeff Given</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Most supplements are garbage and manufactured in utah because of the laws there. No FDA approval on any of it.

Having said that, tge big name manufacturers are legit. </div></div>

Not exactly , their are two major protein suppliers in the US that sell their protein blended to the customers specs , one is on the west cloast the other is Atlanta i think.
I know the owner of the one on the west coast (Dante Turdell) and he has turned down multi million dollar contracts because of the shit fillers that companies want him to add to their blend.
One of the biggest Muscle Tech is the exact same protein found in the cheap stuff Wal-Mart carries "Six Star" and both are crap!!!
also look up the heavy metals that some of these compaines allow in their products , EAS and Muscle Milk being two top offenders AND top sellers!!

The big guys arnt always better
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My personal goals are to maximize my power to weight ratio. </div></div>

It is good that you have a goal. Don't think supplements will help you get there? Good for you, don't take any.

My goals and schedule are completely different than yours. Supplements are an effective way to help me achieve my goals with the time I have.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Even if your goals are to lift the biggest weight or have the biggest arms, etc. I offer this beast to you and he accomplished all of this without supplements: http://gymjones.com/gym/disciple/3/ </div></div>

I also happen to be 6'3", 240, at 15%. He doesn't inspire me at all, because my goals are different than yours. And again, supplements are an effective tool for helping me achieve my goals.
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cavemanmoore</div><div class="ubbcode-body">


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jps24</div><div class="ubbcode-body">First, a supplement is only there in essence because your diet sucks. If you ate correctly, a supplement to your diet would not be needed. </div></div>

Please enlighten us as to which foods increase testosterone production above natural levels.


</div></div>

I agree with most or all of your principles in this thread. Out of curiosity, which supplements/food/other do you use to increase testosterone above natural levels?
 
Re: Argument Against Supplements

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VTi</div><div class="ubbcode-body">which supplements/food/other do you use to increase testosterone above natural levels? </div></div>

H-Drol is my test changer of choice.