Re: L-3 Thermal Eye X200xp Pictures
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GBMaryland</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well, the primary difference is that the X50 doesn't have the detail. It also doesn't see quite as far out... by about 100 meters.
Now, can you see a blob of heat that's either an animal or human, yeah, absolutely. However, the X200xp is about 3 times a sensitive, so you see detail that clearly tells you what you are looking at.
If you take a look at the blurry picture I took through an open window of the trees and side walk, even that picture had pretty good detail. The X50 wouldn't have worked out as well...
Now, to take those pictures, I hooked the X200xp to a 24 inch monitor, put my camera on a tripod, and pointed the X200xp out the window. So that's a pretty good picture all things considering...
The reality is that the X50 will look more like that picture with some of the fine detail missing, and the X200 looks crisp and very clean.
Both are good units, but the X200 just provides that extra level of robust detail that make indentifing objects easier. </div></div>
Thanks for the response.If I had the extra $$$,a 200xp would be in my future.Right now I want a unit for observation.A blurry thermal is better than no thermal.I'll work the fine details out with the thermal scope.