Rifle Scopes Aimpoint PRO
- Thread starter Monkey83
- Start date
Re: Aimpoint PRO
it's a nice optic for the price. personally, i like the micro better, i'd spend a little more and get that.
the pro basically uses the m2 electrical system, so battery life is good, but not as good as you get in the micro's, the comp c3 or m3 series. it's the cheapest nv comparable unit and it comes ready to slap on a rifle.(the qrp mount is included with it)
it's a nice optic for the price. personally, i like the micro better, i'd spend a little more and get that.
the pro basically uses the m2 electrical system, so battery life is good, but not as good as you get in the micro's, the comp c3 or m3 series. it's the cheapest nv comparable unit and it comes ready to slap on a rifle.(the qrp mount is included with it)
Re: Aimpoint PRO
I know quite a few LEOs in departments that require them to buy their own equipment and they have gone with the PRO model. They all like them, especially for the price.
My only advise would be to order a few batteries to have on hand, just in case. Those batteries can be hard to find in some areas.
I know quite a few LEOs in departments that require them to buy their own equipment and they have gone with the PRO model. They all like them, especially for the price.
My only advise would be to order a few batteries to have on hand, just in case. Those batteries can be hard to find in some areas.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
I believe the main difference is night vision capability - the T1 has it, the H1 does not
I believe the main difference is night vision capability - the T1 has it, the H1 does not
Re: Aimpoint PRO
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: "Booze"</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi, I would like to hear some input on the Aimpoint PRO, pro's vs con's. Individual experiences etc.
Thanks </div></div>
Been using the PRO on my .300 Blackout upper for several months now. Just had it out at the range today in fact. No issues whatsoever. It works as advertised. Nice clear glass, long, long battery life. I am very satisfied with it.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: "Booze"</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi, I would like to hear some input on the Aimpoint PRO, pro's vs con's. Individual experiences etc.
Thanks </div></div>
Been using the PRO on my .300 Blackout upper for several months now. Just had it out at the range today in fact. No issues whatsoever. It works as advertised. Nice clear glass, long, long battery life. I am very satisfied with it.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
I have a ML2 and a PRO and for me on a typical rifle I dont think I would pay the extra for the others. Of course the T1 is much smaller and lighter but I am quite happy with the PRO and would not hesitate to get another one if I needed a new red dot. I have seen the Valdada RDS as well as a few other Aimpoints and for $400 ish the pro is my choice as of now.
I have a ML2 and a PRO and for me on a typical rifle I dont think I would pay the extra for the others. Of course the T1 is much smaller and lighter but I am quite happy with the PRO and would not hesitate to get another one if I needed a new red dot. I have seen the Valdada RDS as well as a few other Aimpoints and for $400 ish the pro is my choice as of now.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
From an LE and agency armorer POV:
My agency was able to free up several thousand dollars in the firearms training and ammo budget, and the head of the Firearms division asked me what I thought we should do with it. We were issued Colt M4LE (LE6921) rifles with a forearm light and iron sights for our squad cars. I immediately said "Aimpoint PRO".
I have been a long time Aimpoint user, and I know their optics are simple, have incredibly long battery life, and are knock-down-drag-out reliable. With the money we had available, we were able to pick up optics for every rifle. Initially there was skepticism from the Admin about whether we needed them, and officers were concerned that it would be too complicated to use. All that changed after our first range qual with them. Admin and patrol officers alike were astounded and pleased with how simple the optics were to operate and shoot with. Qualification scores skyrocketed at 50yds and 100yds, and the close-range (25yds and in) shots were coming out much faster. We have both Colts and Wilson Combat 870 12ga shotguns in every car, and many people preferred the shotgun. Now most officers are grabbing rifles, which to me is the superior weapon platform.
What's also nice is that our SOP is the same as what is recommended by Aimpoint, which is to just leave the optic on 24/7. The battery life (30,000hrs/3yrs) was a huge selling point of the optic to the Admin staff.
One of our neighbor agencies has EOTechs, and they have to replace their batteries monthly as a part of normal maintenance because they don't want to take a chance at their optics going down from a dead battery. Additionally, all officers have to carry spare batteries in their car for their optics. They are jealous of us.
A major selling point to the PRO is its simplicity. The mount is simple. You put it on, screw it in until it clicks a couple times, and you're set. The rheostat is a simple dial with heavy clicks. The reticle is a simple dot- nothing to think about.
The only beef I have is that the QRP2 mount that it comes with will loosen if the rifle is subjected to vibration. In our case, the cars driving while the rifles are in the rifle racks between the front seats. As a matter of SOP, at the beginning of the week when we start our first day back on shift (we work in teams), part of your squad checks is to check the rifle for ammunition, function, damage, etc. Now it involves turning the knob on the mount to make sure it's tight. The built-in torque break makes it fool-proof.
The up-side is that when we take the optics off for cleaning the rifles (we use an ultrasonic cleaner), we have noticed no discernible zero shift after remounting.
All of this in an optic that costs $400-$440, and you have a great deal. I personally own a T1 and M4S, and the T1 is by far my favorite due to the small size and light weight. However, the PRO is by far the best bargain and where you will get the most for your money. It is no lesser of an optic than the other models when it comes to quality and capability.
From an LE and agency armorer POV:
My agency was able to free up several thousand dollars in the firearms training and ammo budget, and the head of the Firearms division asked me what I thought we should do with it. We were issued Colt M4LE (LE6921) rifles with a forearm light and iron sights for our squad cars. I immediately said "Aimpoint PRO".
I have been a long time Aimpoint user, and I know their optics are simple, have incredibly long battery life, and are knock-down-drag-out reliable. With the money we had available, we were able to pick up optics for every rifle. Initially there was skepticism from the Admin about whether we needed them, and officers were concerned that it would be too complicated to use. All that changed after our first range qual with them. Admin and patrol officers alike were astounded and pleased with how simple the optics were to operate and shoot with. Qualification scores skyrocketed at 50yds and 100yds, and the close-range (25yds and in) shots were coming out much faster. We have both Colts and Wilson Combat 870 12ga shotguns in every car, and many people preferred the shotgun. Now most officers are grabbing rifles, which to me is the superior weapon platform.
What's also nice is that our SOP is the same as what is recommended by Aimpoint, which is to just leave the optic on 24/7. The battery life (30,000hrs/3yrs) was a huge selling point of the optic to the Admin staff.
One of our neighbor agencies has EOTechs, and they have to replace their batteries monthly as a part of normal maintenance because they don't want to take a chance at their optics going down from a dead battery. Additionally, all officers have to carry spare batteries in their car for their optics. They are jealous of us.
A major selling point to the PRO is its simplicity. The mount is simple. You put it on, screw it in until it clicks a couple times, and you're set. The rheostat is a simple dial with heavy clicks. The reticle is a simple dot- nothing to think about.
The only beef I have is that the QRP2 mount that it comes with will loosen if the rifle is subjected to vibration. In our case, the cars driving while the rifles are in the rifle racks between the front seats. As a matter of SOP, at the beginning of the week when we start our first day back on shift (we work in teams), part of your squad checks is to check the rifle for ammunition, function, damage, etc. Now it involves turning the knob on the mount to make sure it's tight. The built-in torque break makes it fool-proof.
The up-side is that when we take the optics off for cleaning the rifles (we use an ultrasonic cleaner), we have noticed no discernible zero shift after remounting.
All of this in an optic that costs $400-$440, and you have a great deal. I personally own a T1 and M4S, and the T1 is by far my favorite due to the small size and light weight. However, the PRO is by far the best bargain and where you will get the most for your money. It is no lesser of an optic than the other models when it comes to quality and capability.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
If you get a T1, invest in either a LaRue LT660 or an ADM QD mount.
If you get a T1, invest in either a LaRue LT660 or an ADM QD mount.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
Larue is the way to go for sure on the mount.
Larue is the way to go for sure on the mount.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
What's the difference between this and the Comp ML/M 2/3 series? I have a Comp M2 and it's been a beast all these years.
What's the difference between this and the Comp ML/M 2/3 series? I have a Comp M2 and it's been a beast all these years.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JelloStorm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's the difference between this and the Comp ML/M 2/3 series? I have a Comp M2 and it's been a beast all these years. </div></div>
I kind of think of the PRO as a repackaged M2. I don't know if there's any difference at all in the electronics or the housing. Looks exactly the same to me.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JelloStorm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's the difference between this and the Comp ML/M 2/3 series? I have a Comp M2 and it's been a beast all these years. </div></div>
I kind of think of the PRO as a repackaged M2. I don't know if there's any difference at all in the electronics or the housing. Looks exactly the same to me.
Re: Aimpoint PRO
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CaliShooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JelloStorm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's the difference between this and the Comp ML/M 2/3 series? I have a Comp M2 and it's been a beast all these years. </div></div>
I kind of think of the PRO as a repackaged M2. I don't know if there's any difference at all in the electronics or the housing. Looks exactly the same to me. </div></div>
It's more of a repackaged M3. The old M2 has about 1/3rd the battery life of the PRO due to it's older generation circuitry. They claim a better battery life with the M3 over the pro but they both use the same circuitry so that doesn't really check though I'm not an aimpoint expert so there may be something I'm missing.
The PRO is a great optic for the money but if you can swing the extra cash the Micro is less than half the weight, which is a big deal to a guy like me.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CaliShooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JelloStorm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's the difference between this and the Comp ML/M 2/3 series? I have a Comp M2 and it's been a beast all these years. </div></div>
I kind of think of the PRO as a repackaged M2. I don't know if there's any difference at all in the electronics or the housing. Looks exactly the same to me. </div></div>
It's more of a repackaged M3. The old M2 has about 1/3rd the battery life of the PRO due to it's older generation circuitry. They claim a better battery life with the M3 over the pro but they both use the same circuitry so that doesn't really check though I'm not an aimpoint expert so there may be something I'm missing.
The PRO is a great optic for the money but if you can swing the extra cash the Micro is less than half the weight, which is a big deal to a guy like me.
Similar threads
Rifle Scopes LMT MARS-L
