Re: Is it worth putting a muzzel brake on a .308
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rob.308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">EZTUNDRA77 do you have a Toyota Tundra? I just laughed when I read your post. I ask because we have the same gun and possibly the same truck! Just too funny if it is true.
Mine does have the 24 in barrel on it and I just love the gun. I couldn't be happier with it. I feel like I didn't buy enough optic for it. I am using a 4.5 X 14 Leupold on it. I was in the process of going with something stronger for it when someone suggested putting a break on it. With the machine work + brake + shipping I am in the $300 range. Certainly cheaper than the new optic I have been considering. I have twice shot a penny at 200yds with the setup I have now. I just really enjoy shooting as accurately as I can.
What rounds are you shooting through yours? I am using Hornady 30501's, 168gr match round. I weigh each round before I load them and they seem very good for the money. The come in a box of 100 instead of 50 like others I have tried. I am always interested in seeing what others are using with success. I had the action bedded into the stock but I just didn't see much of a difference at the distances I am shooting, but, I haven't gone out past 600 yards yet.
</div></div>
yeah, that's crazy. Great minds think alike. I have a 2011 TT Double cab 4x4 w/ the 5.7, tow package, cold package, 4.30 rear end, Rhino Lining bed. It's awesome. I embarrased my buddy the other day in his Harley Davison F150 supercharged. It wasn't even close.
I shoot federal gold medal match 175 gr, 7.62 x 51. I also have some FGMM 168gr. in .308. But I've heard from numerous sources that the R5 milspec barrel was designed to optimally shoot 175gr bullets. But there's obviously room there to debate. I think they advertise than it will shoot sub MOA with any load, but I saw a Remington gunsmith post on the 700 forum that match grade 175gr. will produce 1/4 MOA groups with a good shooter behind. I don't doubt that. I has my buddy at the range the other day. He had never shot any rifle before that, and he made just under 1 MOA with 3 of his four shots. The forth got squirrely, but still. Even though we were only at 70 yards, I was still impressed by him and the rifle.
And my next glass will cost at least 1.5 times as much as the rifle was. I'm looking at the Night Force 12x42x56
http://nightforceoptics.com/12-42-x-56-nxs/.