Re: Use the expander ball or no???
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kevin Thomas</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I do use an expander ball (slightly modified carbide type) with my bushing dies, but it's a world of difference between what most expect to see/feel when you mention "expander balls." I use a bushing that sizes the neck to a dimension that allows the expander to pass back through the now-resized neck with only the faintest touch. Just about enough that I can tell when it passes through the neck, nothing more. If there's any real resistance, you need a slightly larger neck bushing, to the point where that "faint passage" is felt. I use these since any variance in neck wall thickness is transfered to the inside of the case neck when a case is sized without an expander ball. This, in extreme cases, can give varying degrees of neck tension, which is precisely what I'm trying to avoid. The expander ball simply transfers whatever variance there may be back to the outside of the case neck, and gives somewhat more uniform neck tension.
Different strokes, and just throwing this one out for you to consider. </div></div>
What Kevin describes is what Zediker describes in his reloading book "Handloading for Competition". If you uniform the case necks and don't ding them up, you can and should go the bushing only route. Some will also resize in two steps as it is supposed to result in more concentric ammo.
When reloading .308, I use Lapua brass and the carbide expander just barely touches the inside of the necks with a .336 bushing. By comparison, when reloading Winchester brass I really notice the variations in case neck thickness by the varying resistance on the expander. In that case, it's better to use an expander or else your bullet will serve that purpose which doesn't help accuracy.
Zediker does an excellent job discussing the pros and cons of each approach.