Re: Aimpoint m2 or Eotech 552 I cant decide .Help
552 Pro's:
- larger aperture tends to let a little more light in to the tube
- AA batteries are available everywhere
- smaller aiming point allows for a little more precise engagement
552 Con's:
- Waterproofing is highly questionable. Model has always had issues with the battery compartment "weeping"
- Battery connections are poorly designed. contact springs can become "captured" by the recoil buffers and sight will shut off. I have fixed more sights, than people, with my hemostats.
M2 Pro's:
- Amazing battery life
- Extremely durable
M2 Con's:
- 1/3 N batteries can be difficult to find. Not terribly important since they last so long but, you just never know when Murphy is going to show up!
- Slightly less light through the smaller aperture.
- 4 MOA aiming point
I base all of the above on my duty experience with both sights and, using both for hunting. For the money, I will take the rugged reliability of the Aimpoint. I had a bad run with the EO Tech when we tested them for use in SOCOM. The Marines had similar results. Most recently, they did not pass the Army test. Surprisingly, we ended up with it in the SOPMOD kit! Go figure. Didn't matter much, as half of us ran our own Micro T-1's.
After saying that and, in all fairness to L3, they recently sent me an XPS-3 to test and, I think, to try and win me back over. It's first 1000 rounds have shown it to be a good optic. I am going to turn up the heat on it and see where she goes from here. It will probably not earn a place on my "work guns" but, I highly suspect that it will find a permanent home on a hunting rifle.
Bottom line: either one of these optics will serve you well. I am obviously biased towards the Aimpoint but, that does not mean the EO Tech would be a bad option for your application. Weigh the factors that matter the most to you and, the choice should become obvious.
Be Safe,
Kyle