• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Rifle Scopes Weaver vs Picatinny Help

ridenrunwv

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 22, 2013
329
12
Charleston, WV
I ordered a Weaver Multi-Slot 20 MOA base after reading reviews and am about to order rings but don't know whether to order Picatinny or Weaver rings. I know this is probably a dumb question but I've been trying to search and am not finding very much. Found where Weaver rings will work on a Picatinny rail but not the other way around but just want to know what's best.

It says in the description for the base that it can use either Weaver or Picatinny rings.
 
Accurateshooter has a straightforward answer:
February 28th, 2009
TECH TIP: Picatinny vs. Weaver Rail Specifications

Readers often ask “What’s the difference between a Weaver scope rail and a Picatinny Rail?” The answer is not as simple as it seems. The dimensions of a Picatinny Rail should be consistent (from one rail-maker to another), since there IS a government spec. Conversely, there is some variance in “Weaver-style” rails. The width of the groove is the most important difference between Picatinny Rails and weaver rails. “Mil-spec” Picatinny rails will have a grove width of 0.206″ while Weaver rails typically have a narrower, 0.180″ groove width.

Brownell’s has a helpful GunTech Article that discusses the Picatinny Rail vs. Weaver Rail. That article explains:

“What are the differences between the ‘Picatinny’ and the ‘Weaver’ systems? The profile of the two systems is virtually identical. Depending on the quality of the machining done by the manufacturer, the two systems should be indistinguishable from the profile. The key difference lies in the placement of the recoil grooves and with width of the grooves. MIL-STD-1913 (Picatinny) grooves are .206″ wide and have a center-to-center width of .394”. The placement of these grooves has to be consistent in order for it to be a true ‘Picatinny’MIL-STD system. Weaver systems have a .180” width of recoil groove and are not necessarily consistent in a center-to-center measurement from one groove to the next.



In many instances, a Weaver system has a specific application that it is machined for, so interchangeability is not necessarily an issue. A MIL-STD-1913 system must adhere to the specifications listed above in order for it to be considered MIL-STD, since the military desires uniformity in the recoil grooves to allow for different systems to be mounted on the weapon with no concern for compatibility.

Now, what does this mean to you? Boiled down, it means that accessories designed for a Weaver system will, in most cases, fit on a ‘Picatinny’ system. The reverse, however, is probably not the case. Due to the larger recoil groove, ‘Picatinny’ accessories will not fit a Weaver system. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule, but for a good rule-of-thumb, [full-width] ‘Picatinny’ won’t fit Weaver, but Weaver will fit ‘Picatinny’.”
 
The Weaver base I ordered says it works with Picatinny or Weaver rings so I was just wondering what would be the best choice? I was just reading that same article on Brownell's by the way.
 
Ok... I think I got this figured out after all the reading. Picatinny is best if your base will accept Picatinny rings? Was looking at TPS rings on Midway when seeing Weaver and Picatinny listed.
 
The big difference is in the slot width and spacing.
If whatever you are mounting on the rail has more than 1 clamp screw or recoil lug or a combination of both, then Weaver rail accessories are incompatible with Picatinny rails and vice versa.

For scope rings that have 1 rail clamp screw per ring it won't make a difference.

Joe