• New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

H4895 vs. imr 4895

They are pretty close to the same on the burn rate chart with H being a little faster but the main difference is that H is an "extreme" powder so it isn't nearly if at all temp sensitive. You will want to develop a new load if you are changing from one to the other.
 
H-4895 has shorter kernels and will measure though a powder hopper a little better than IMR 4895. As vs pointed out, H-4895 is one of Hodgdon's "Extreme" powders which are less temperature sensitive than the IMR counterparts. If I have a choice, I will always choose a powder that has less temperature sensitivity over one that does not.
 
H-4895 shoots the 155's better for me while the IMR-4895 shoots the 168's better. They don't seem to play well with each other though, shooting 1 behind the other, the 1st 3 or 4 shots are a bit wild then settle down.
 
I too just switched to hodgdons since I couldn't find any IMR. To be safe I did a little work up and found the results to be about exactly the same for me. 42.5 gr. Pushing 168's. Gives me nice groups.
 
H-4895 has shorter kernels and will measure though a powder hopper a little better than IMR 4895. As vs pointed out, H-4895 is one of Hodgdon's "Extreme" powders which are less temperature sensitive than the IMR counterparts. If I have a choice, I will always choose a powder that has less temperature sensitivity over one that does not.

IMR 4895 had the highest velocity variation with temp in a chart of 308 powders, H 4895 was not listed but IMR 4064 showed about 1/4 the variance