• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

jtb33

jtb33

Full Member
Full Member
Minuteman
Jun 15, 2010
502
15
PHX, AZ - USA
Just wondering why Remington hasn't ever come out with a 700 model chambered in .22LR. I am already aware of the 40-X rifles, but they are single shot. It would be great if Remington made a rifle that was a 700 model in every aspect, but a repeater chambered in .22LR. Interchangeable stocks and triggers will all other 700 rifles.

Seriously wondering why they don't have one...
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

I'd definitely get one if they were available.
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

The Remington 504 reminds me of the 700, a few small differences but other than that its very close.

EDIT: never handled one but the 547 looks even closer than the 504.
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

The 504 hasn't been made for ~5 years and the 547 is a custom-shop gun, I believe (~$1K). I don't think either one can use Remington 700 triggers and stocks.

If they can make a .308 Remington 700 and sell it for $650 new (AAC-SD), you'd think a .22LR version of that same rifle would be at least as cheap as that. May as well go with a 40-X at that price, even if it's not a repeater.
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

Remingtons main market is fudds. They want a 22 that's light.
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

They actually did make some 40x repeaters in 22 LR but theres not a bunch of them out there.
Why did they not make them? Becouse it would make way to much sence! Hell, why did they stop making the 541T or S?
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

Do the 40-X have the same lug dimensions as the the 700? Wondering Cause if they do you could have a 700 action with a PT&G 40-X bolt.
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

I really like my CZ452 Varmit, as a quasi trainer, but I'd dearly love to have a Rem 700 in .22LR as well. Wishfull thinking on our parts though unless somebody convinces the powers that be at Remington that there is a significant market for this rifle.
 
Re: Why no Remington 700 in .22LR? (not 40-X)

I'm no gun smith. But would it be possible to make an after market bolt like a PTG in .22 and chamber a barrel blank for it?
 
Nothing like taking 2 years to answer this but "no" the dimensions aren't even close. Standard 700 has its lugs at the nose of the bolt. A 40-X has its lugs half way back. No way to interchange.
 
Ha, i never would have caught the age of the thread had you not said that!

Anyways, repeaters had alot of feeding issues, and a conversion has to be done thru the ATF since its a centerfire to rimfire. And Bill Calfee did do some on the xp100s but thats already a pistol action and all i have seen him do were kept as a pistol configuration.

I did buy a stiller lonestar (40x) clone and he was supposed to be coming out with a repeater but i think demand for other actions put that on the backburner.
 
As far as I know, the ATF doesn't give a rats rear whether it's a centerfire ro rimfire... they only care if the barrel on a rifle is replaced with a pistol (sub 16") barrel.

I'm sure the reason that Remington doesn't make one is that despite what folks on boards like this think, the market for a "full size", high quality, .22 rifle is statistically barely above "zero"... On their scale of marketing, virtually NO ONE would buy a $700 .22 Rimfire. Sure, folks HERE are going to chime in with "I'd buy one!", but that's like saying you'd find someone to buy a pair of fur lined handcuffs at a BDSM convention. Try selling a pair at your local clothing store, and see how many sell.

Same reason Winchester, when HANDED the contract to make more Winchester 52D/E rifles for the Army, turned it down flat... (this was in the mid '70's) They had no interest in making smallbore rifles any more, because no one bought them. They dumped the whole line of quality .22's.
Remington made the same decision when they dumped the 581, and 541X, and 40X line (outside of a few custom shop guns they sell at ridiculous prices).
 
Remington did make a 40x sporter, 22lr, repeater-really. I have seen one with my own little eye!
 
I'm willing to bet one of the super talented smiths on here could probably custom make a bolt with a rimfire face on it that fits a 700 action. Then they'd have to fit a barrel aswell. ANYTHING is possible...with money. I just don't know if anyone would delve into that realm as the time and effort it would take would be terrible. The juice may not be worth the squeeze. But if anyone can do it, I'd say Chad Dixon, SAC, AZPrecision or black ops tech would be the guys that could pull it off... I'll be waiting gents!! Haha
 
Would you guys have bought one 2 years ago? Probably not. Not that ammo has basically doubled in price, if and when we can find it, it makes sense to shoot .22. The firearms manufactures will catch on to this soon enough. I foresee a ton of new options in 22lr in the near future.
 
Lou Gamgee and
Beyschaefer said:
As far as I know, the ATF doesn't give a rats rear whether it's a centerfire ro rimfire... they only care if the barrel on a rifle is replaced with a pistol (sub 16") barrel.

I'm sure the reason that Remington doesn't make one is that despite what folks on boards like this think, the market for a "full size", high quality, .22 rifle is statistically barely above "zero"... On their scale of marketing, virtually NO ONE would buy a $700 .22 Rimfire. Sure, folks HERE are going to chime in with "I'd buy one!", but that's like saying you'd find someone to buy a pair of fur lined handcuffs at a BDSM convention. Try selling a pair at your local clothing store, and see how many sell.

Same reason Winchester, when HANDED the contract to make more Winchester 52D/E rifles for the Army, turned it down flat... (this was in the mid '70's) They had no interest in making smallbore rifles any more, because no one bought them. They dumped the whole line of quality .22's.
Remington made the same decision when they dumped the 581, and 541X, and 40X line (outside of a few custom shop guns they sell at ridiculous prices).
Click to expand...



I'm not sure the stats are barely above zero zero. Have you tried to buy a cooper lately? They are high dollar and there is a waiting line. anschutz another high dollar quality rifle.

Cheers
 
Because they are to busy designing rifles chambered in .260..........Ok. maybe not.
 
My guess is because it would need around 800 in machining/rebarreling/chambering and gunsmithing to make it shoot right like the rest of the rifles in it's class( tikka, WIN 70, FN PBR)
 
On Remingtons scale of things, the few thousand rifles Cooper sells IS zero...
Didn't mean the demand was actually "zero", just that the numbers aren't enough for Remington to bother.


1legmont said:
Lou Gamgee and



I'm not sure the stats are barely above zero zero. Have you tried to buy a cooper lately? They are high dollar and there is a waiting line. anschutz another high dollar quality rifle.

Cheers
Click to expand...
 
I think Pawprint2 is correct. They were discontinued in 2006. I was offered one a couple of years ago for $3500.00 maybe. That is if you say yes, maybe I'll sell it to you. I never saw it but they purportedly were from the custom shop. The model designation was 40-XR Custom Sporter.
 
Last edited:
Remington did have a model 700 in .22LR . It is called a Remington 40x Sporter. It had a 5 shot magazine. I purchased one in about 1973 for about $525. Now they are about $3500. Remington only made about 535 of the rifles. Unfortunately I sold mine NIB in about 1988 when I needed money for the family. I have a Remington 700C and the 40X Sporter looked much like the 700C.
 
Do people just search for something related to the one fact they know about guns so they can reply to sound smart and just not realize it’s a 7 year old thread that nobody gives a fuck about.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 03CR, 1moaoff and Krazy_jim
Post count bumping?


Screenshot_20200308-161825_Chrome.jpg
 
I own a Rem 700 5R in .223 that I prefer over a .22LR. And for a practice gun, I really like .223 over .22LR. But if I where buying a .22LR, it would be Bergara even if Remmy made one.

PB
 
_Raining said:
Do people just search for something related to the one fact they know about guns so they can reply to sound smart and just not realize it’s a 7 year old thread that nobody gives a fuck about.
Click to expand...


Yes we do, we do. Lol
I am working on a conversion for my 700.
It is a regular 700 in 22-250 ackley and it will switch to 22lr.

Waiting for some parts. Will update in about 2 months. That is If anyone gives a fuck. Lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Packjam
30-06 Remington 700 ADL to 300 WIN
Replies
2
Views
460
Red_SC
Red_SC
Roach21
SOLD Remington M541 X 22lr Military target rifle
Replies
1
Views
517
Trx498r
Trx498r
Darryle
Browning X-Bolt Target Max Competition Lite information
Replies
3
Views
118
Darryle
Darryle
R
PRS Build Advice from Blueprinted Custom Remington Model 7
Replies
19
Views
493
Riflman
R
USMCSGT0331
A thread with links to suitable donor rifles?
Replies
5
Views
351
RIGREG
R
Top Bottom
Back