• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Range Report .300 win mag new load problem

Cncjerry

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
May 27, 2013
112
0
I was going to throw this target away but it is keeping me awake at night.

I shot 6 shots with a new COAL of 3.51" using 190 smk's loaded with 64gr of IMR 7828 SSC and magnum primers. Previously I had shot the same load with a COAL of 3.44 and they grouped pretty good, generally under .75MOA with a number under .5MOA. I realize they are very lightly loaded but they seem to group better at this speed, at least have in the past.

Looking at the target though, you will see the problem and I can't figure out it.

The shot order was 1,2 in the lower group, followed by 3 in the upper, then 4 in the lower and 5,6 in the upper. The strange thing, and the reason I think it is the load, is from the chrono data below:

Shot, fps
1, 2544
2, 2559
3, 2645
4, 2569
5, 2614
6, 2635

You'll note shots 1,2,4 that make-up the lower group average 2,557fps and shots 3,5,6 average 2,631 a difference of 75 fps. I don't think 75 fps is enough to cause a 2" difference at 100yds by itself, what, maybe 1/4"? This gun is more load sensitive than other's I have known and has produced some really nice groups below .5MOA with the best being .221MOA. The groups above are .311 and .367 MOA taken individually.

As to the load, I am using twice fired brass, cut and measured on a lathe. It was a new box of 190 SMK and they were seated nearly perfectly at a COAL of 3.51 but measured to the ogive +/- < .001. The powder was measured on a beam and I checked it against a digital when I started. The primers are known to be good.

The only thing I can think of is I wasn't timing the shots that well but all 6 were taken within 20 minutes and the barrel was hardly warm. But the chrono data must be telling something.

The rifle is a Remington tactical long range, 26" barrel in a B&C stock with aluminum bed. I scrape-bedded the aluminum and then bedded it again with JB weld. Everything is torqued and checked with two wrenches (wish that was wenches). Jewell trigger added as well. Shot from a bench on bags.

If it's me, then there are two of me alternating shots. It takes a lot of concentration to get a good group from this gun. I don't have a brake on it and though I am a pretty big person, it still pushes me and the bags back about a foot.

So the final question is, should I ignore the chrono data and assume there is something loose? Any other thoughts on the load? Buy the way, at 3.51 I am .030 off the lands.

Thanks

Jerry

08032013 grp1 190 66.jpg
 
Jerry,
I'm sure there are guys with a bunch more knowledge than me that will post but my 1st thought is to try a different primer. I had a similar problem with a .308 once that was double grouping but not as bad as yours. I changed from 210M's to BR2's and pulled them in to one group.

I also had a reputable gunsmith here on SH tell me one time that when he gets double groups, 1st up is to change powder.

Hope this helps.
 
Jerry,
I'm sure there are guys with a bunch more knowledge than me that will post but my 1st thought is to try a different primer. I had a similar problem with a .308 once that was double grouping but not as bad as yours. I changed from 210M's to BR2's and pulled them in to one group.

I also had a reputable gunsmith here on SH tell me one time that when he gets double groups, 1st up is to change powder.

Hope this helps.

The slight variance in FPS between the two leads me to think it is primer or powder. There is a small chance that some rifle primers got mixed in with the magnum as we had loaded both recently but I am pretty careful. I made up some more last night with heavy brass, fresh primer box, etc and am on my way over to see if I can isolate it.

Thanks for the info.

p.s. now that I think about it, there is a possibility I poured the remainder of one can of 7828 into another then poured both into the measure. So assuming it didn't mix, it would have stratified and stayed separate.

grasping at straws as even so, I don't remember 75fps making a 2" difference at 100yds.
 
Double check to make sure everything is still good and tight.
If the powder lot and primers check fails try bumping up your charge and see how that works out. My 300 sure loves 7828, i'm running a heavier bullet and about 7 grains more powder to boot.
edit: Never mind bumping your powder charge up, I re-read you already have tried that in the past.
 
Last edited:
Try using standard primers, I personally don't use magnum primers. Potentially another issue may be powder fill percentage.
My go to load with 190SMK is 68 grs/IMR 4350 and standard primer.
 
I have an El Cheapo brand Chromo and would get similar readings but with good accuracy. Saw a guy with an expensive Chromo and asked him to take some shots with his. Results were better.
He was an experienced shooter talking way over my head but the long and short of it was I had my Chromo too close to get an accurate reading and that the deviation I was seeing was acceptable as long as the majority of the readings were within the range I was looking for.
Tried it again with the Chromo at 10' hoping not to shoot it down and the deviation shrunk.
Hope this helps.
 
Try using standard primers, I personally don't use magnum primers. Potentially another issue may be powder fill percentage.
My go to load with 190SMK is 68 grs/IMR 4350 and standard primer.

I too had Es and sd shrink with regular lr primers. Beware that it will hang fire with ball powders though....