• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

How confidant are you; 3/4 inch consistantly at 100+ yards POLL

How confidant are you; 3/4 inch consistantly at 100+ yards POLL

  • I'd get all 5 close to 100% of the time

    Votes: 16 15.8%
  • I'd get 2-3 close to 100% of the time

    Votes: 54 53.5%
  • I'd get at least 1 everytime

    Votes: 19 18.8%
  • I'd be lucky to get it on the paper

    Votes: 4 4.0%
  • Other; Please explain

    Votes: 8 7.9%

  • Total voters
    101
I believe in depending on the .22LR for all the way out to 50yd, and that any distance beyond that is just not totally practical (if reliably defeating a target of 1MOA or smaller is the goal). So the entire question falls outside my comfort zone.

There are other goals, like learning wind skills, and I can support such goals.

Greg

I shoot a lot of game with a 22LR, about 5-700 game in total per year, I shoot about 3000 rnds of 22LR a year, I am with Greg on this one for fun, and at times when the stars, and the moon and sun are in correct alignement, I get good hits at ranges beyond 50 meters but still, the 22LR is just not good enough, sure some of you guys/your rifle are that day in those conditions.

There are some fine shooting in this thread being done and still, above stays true as a rule, not an exception. /Chris
 
My guess is that 18.78% of the respondents on this poll are likely FOS....

What I was thinking just last night myself. AND I haven't even voted yet. I will vote as soon as I get a chance to try this. As others have said, thanks to the OP for a great post. I will admit I had my doubts when it started if it could rise above the standard saber rattling.
 
What I was thinking just last night myself. AND I haven't even voted yet. I will vote as soon as I get a chance to try this. As others have said, thanks to the OP for a great post. I will admit I had my doubts when it started if it could rise above the standard saber rattling.

For this reason, I was contemplating a 'I can hit 5 out of 5 100% of the time, easily' option to see who was seriously full of shit.

With center-fire its something different; I can still see the occasional flier even with Wolf Match and I am willing to bet that an unseen gust of wind and the thickness of the reticle at times add into the mix.

On a positive note, doing pseduo-dynamic things like this rather than just shooting for groups let you see some of the errors you can make that do not come into play as much when simply shooting static groups. I realized that I ended up moving my face/arm to move the rifle from left to right instead of my entire shoulder/arm which led to a significant parallax error when I got to the last 2. Took me a few strings to realize why I was nailing 1-3 most of the time and then 4 and 5 were 1.5 inches somewhere else.
 
On a positive note, doing pseduo-dynamic things like this rather than just shooting for groups let you see some of the errors you can make that do not come into play as much when simply shooting static groups.

This was the best part of shooting this drill. Knowing when I messed up and when other things either ammo, wind, ect caused a miss on a good shot. It just seems to become more apparent for me than when shooting for groups...

I think this is one of the better threads we have had in a while at least for me. It has got me thinking. I think I am going to run it again but next time with 1" targets to help with the thick reticle but only count shots that are contained inside the target. I think that would still require the same 3/4" precision or at least pretty close. I find myself when not shooting steel at distance doing too much group shooting and not enough impact shooting at challenging targets like this. My shooting partner and I talk about it from time to time but it usually just goes back to the not so productive group shooing. I need to change that!! Thanks again to TheGerman, and everyone else who has contributed to make this thread what it is.
 
Almost 20% of the shooters here really think they are going to shoot 5 consecutive shots at .75MOA at 100 yards with a .22lr in variable wind conditions almost every time? To me, claiming to be able to do it almost 100% of the time means at least 90% of the time. If you set up 50 targets you could only miss once! One time. Not even twice. Just once. ONE! And 20% of the people here are confident in that? I tend to agree with others here. Probably more confidence here than there should be.
 
jbell, not a bad idea. I think tomorrow I'm going to try this again but put a smaller white dot in the middle of the 3/4" black dot to allow for a reference point through the scope.
 
Heck, I can do it all day long with my Nylon 66 and 4X Weaver with 3/4" tube. It's a real tack driver with CCI Blazers.
 
On a more serious note. I wish some of you could shoot my match Brock's Gap Training Center, Hoover, Alabama - .22 Sniper Match I think you would enjoy it. In 2+ years there have only been 4 perfect 60/60 scores shot. Last match we had two. OTOH there was zero wind. I have changed a few of the target sizes recently. 50 yd 1 1/2"x2", 75 2"x2" and 100 is 2"x3".

And wind is so important with rimfire.
Was out yesterday with my .22WMR which normally shoots right around 1MOA with NO wind and when I'm having a good day (otherwise about 1.5MOA).
Yesterday wind of 10mph with numerous gusts to 25mph.
Wow...those 3" groups are sure disheartening ;-)
 
cjd223, I would love to shoot it. I may be moving to NC next year. I will look into it when I get down there, I have been looking for a 22lr tactical match but there are not many up here in Maine.
 
cjd223, I would love to shoot it. I may be moving to NC next year. I will look into it when I get down there, I have been looking for a 22lr tactical match but there are not many up here in Maine.

What part of NC? We can scratch just about every shooting itch you have and give you a few more. :)
 
Very cool, thank you. I am looking at the Ashville area. I have also talked to a few others here on the Hide who live in the area. I am feeling better about moving to the area already. I know it is great area for mountain biking, hiking, and fishing but I was having trouble finding any place to shoot especially long range. However with the good people here on the hide things are looking up... Thanks to all, now back to this great thread.
 
On a more serious note. I wish some of you could shoot my match Brock's Gap Training Center, Hoover, Alabama - .22 Sniper Match I think you would enjoy it. In 2+ years there have only been 4 perfect 60/60 scores shot. Last match we had two. OTOH there was zero wind. I have changed a few of the target sizes recently. 50 yd 1 1/2"x2", 75 2"x2" and 100 is 2"x3".

Make you a deal. You come to our's: http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...el-challenge-2013-season-july-results-up.html
and I will come to your's. No one has EVER shot a perfect score on our course.
 
Looks to be too tough for my old busted up body. That's what happens when a 60 year old decides to ride a Sport Bike again after road racing at Talladega and Daytona decades ago = dead man on the side of the road after crash. Injuries are way too numerous to list.
 
I did try like the dickens with this drill and spent 250 rounds this morning on it. At 50 yards I was 100% with both the CZ455PT and the Walther KKM. I have shot small bore with innumerable shooters who could do this. Time was not a factor at all, even with the single loading KKM. It got boring very quick.

100 yards was a different story altogether. I was about 65% with the KKM. With the CZ I got it once out of 10 tries (5 targets) and shot each string in far less than 30 seconds. With no wind there was no reason to take more than 15-20 seconds to complete the drill with a repeater. It is a normal day for me to get 1 MOA, or just sub 1 MOA with this CZ using Wolf Match Extra, Lapua Midas L, and Lapua Polar. But 1 MOA will get you plenty of misses on a 3/4" target. I had a few targets where I missed all 5 but had 4 out of 5 that were the thickness of a hair from touching the line. I may try again tomorrow morning but I don't think I can do any better. It's just the limit of the gun and available ammo. It's a bit of a novelty exercise.

At the risk of sounding like a cop-out on this drill, I am not sure it's the best use of practice time. A few of my favorite clubs have 200 yard rimfire matches. The NRA 200yd smallbore target has a 12" black center. With this shooting it has been my experience that the shooter who can better call the wind and respond to changing environmental conditions that takes the day. I think this is a more worthwhile practice target. It is also interesting to note that I have been told by a few of the best smallbore shooters in the country (and 1 Czech) that an average of 19mm (0.748") at 100yds is the theoretical (mechanical) limit of a 22LR. I don't know how they came to this conclusion, but I think if shooters of that caliber are losing years of sleep trying to beat that as their average then maybe I should be quite proud of my 65%.

If I do try again, and do any better, I'll snap some pics of the targets.

22s_zpse1d58c8e.jpg
 
I get what you're saying Moses.
This past weekend I was at the range with my Savage .22WMR. The wind was unpredictable and gusting to 25mph and I was having a devil of a time...a couple of solid 1.5" groups, but most had a least one flyer that would open up the group to 3" .
Then I put a target up at 200m just to see what I could do in the wind.
Adjusted 3 mils for drop and 2 for wind and the first round hit the edge of the 5" bull I was aiming at.
The following 4 shots made up a not spectacular 4.5" group...but I was ecstatic just to think I could do that considering the conditions.
Made me think that with todays rifles and scopes 100yds/m is not all that much a test of skill. It might test your rifles quality...but I think that 200-300 yds/m is where you start to see what kind of shooter you are.
 
I claimed I could hit one out of five with the rig I'd be shooting, and I think that's more the norm for this. Two to three out of five? Maybe two...
 
jbell, not a bad idea. I think tomorrow I'm going to try this again but put a smaller white dot in the middle of the 3/4" black dot to allow for a reference point through the scope.

Try using a white dot on a black background then quarter the dot with your reticule, that is a simple easy way to gain a precise aiming point with crosshairs.
 
I claimed I could hit one out of five with the rig I'd be shooting, and I think that's more the norm for this. Two to three out of five? Maybe two...

I agree with you. As I've seen countless times at the range or taking friends shooting, people can always shoot very well until they actually have to.....shoot.

I put up I'd hit 3 every-time. I'd be willing to put any amount of money/gear/pride on it. I do however think that there would be quite a few here that would be 'having an off day' had we all gotten together to shoot this coarse.
 
I have shot many matches over the years and I can assure you, if you shoot matches long enough you won't just have an off day, you will have off years. I do know and agree with you about people suddenly having an off day. Also some people perform better with pressure. I can assure you, when I try this little drill I am sure I would do better if the line was full than if I am at the range by myself. I work better under pressure most matches. Some people can't stand the pressure. That is why this excercise works much better under the clock. The clock will actually make the pressure guys shoot better, it will fluster the hell out of the others.
 
I have shot many matches over the years and I can assure you, if you shoot matches long enough you won't just have an off day, you will have off years. I do know and agree with you about people suddenly having an off day. Also some people perform better with pressure. I can assure you, when I try this little drill I am sure I would do better if the line was full than if I am at the range by myself. I work better under pressure most matches. Some people can't stand the pressure. That is why this excercise works much better under the clock. The clock will actually make the pressure guys shoot better, it will fluster the hell out of the others.

You want to make sure I have an "off day?" Just hide my Skoal can...
 
I keep trying. I'm improving in that I'm making the time limit (most of the time)
Shooting from the bench with my CZ 455 American with Lilja tapered 22lr barrel.

CZ455Lilja-Mueller2.JPG


No problem getting 2 rounds inside the quarter sized circle, but the other 3 shots, not always so good.
 
Last edited:
A shooting coach once taught me; if the bull is too small to quarter with the scope, adjust so you make the reticle tangent with two sides.

Works for me a lot of the time when I have time to adjust befor shooting.
 
I tried it yesterday with one piece rest and my left hand self made martini with 36X sightron scope. 2 of 5 twice 3 of 5 once and 4 of 5 once. With a bolt action single shot 40x I could probably only get off 2 at the most 3 shots. Not sure I would hit any. Wouldn't even consider trying it with a bipod. Wayne
 
ok ok I am in. haven't voted yet
and I don't know how I missed this thread.

will be back when completed.

another way to analyze the data, and I'd be interested in RR
targets, is the % of times you feel confident you can get the 5 hits out of 5, not percentage of hits out of 100. JBell looks like you had 2 out of 8 where you got 5/5. meaning a completion of 25%. amazing considering you hit 85% of the dots

I feel like the frequent Rimfire shooters initially interpreted the question as such. and hence the instant burning of comments of being able to do so. that was my initial thought and after reevaluation I would be happy with a 20-40% 5/5 with my rifle.

YES I feel confident I can hit 5/5.....at least once haha.

will update once completed

Regards
DT
 
Any interest in a postal match with this target, slightly modified? Something to the tune of 2 strings of 3/4 inch circles per targets, on a specific paper target that I mail you (small fee/postage), max of say 4 targets allowed per shooter.

The other trick is, somehow to go into the scoring variable, is that you have to state how many you will hit per target. Guessing too many or too few is penalized somehow (so that people don't say they will hit 1, and know they'll get 4).

Would need to come up with some sort of scoring system, but let me know if theres enough interest and we'll figure something out.
 
This reminds me of the MOA ALL DAY thread on Arfcom. For having some of the most laser accurate motherfuckers on the face of creation, this board comes up severely wanting (people who actually can vs people who say they can) whenever a challenge is issued. Zero doubt that there are some lasers on this forum but there is a lot of noise to go with that signal. A few legit people and a bunch of pole smokers.

I'll give it a whirl next time I'm out but I'm betting I'd be lucky to see 1 in 5 first round hits @ 50yd with my current rifle. The barrel is off getting some adjustments, so I guess we'll see. I shot a .3XX" 5rd center to center @ 100yd out of a 308 AR. The only reason I have a record of it is in case anyone ever wants proof that unicorns actually do exist. Doesn't mean I can do it every day, doesn't mean it will ever happen again.
 
Any interest in a postal match with this target, slightly modified? Something to the tune of 2 strings of 3/4 inch circles per targets, on a specific paper target that I mail you (small fee/postage), max of say 4 targets allowed per shooter.

The other trick is, somehow to go into the scoring variable, is that you have to state how many you will hit per target. Guessing too many or too few is penalized somehow (so that people don't say they will hit 1, and know they'll get 4).

Would need to come up with some sort of scoring system, but let me know if theres enough interest and we'll figure something out.

I'd be interested in giving it a try. Heck, I figure if I hit just one and the others are close, it still wouldn't be a bad group.
 
Ill go for the postal matches. I am down with whatever course of fire you want. I think I can talk my shooting partner into doing it too...
 
How about doing a stage at one of your 22 precision rifle matches. Something like two 5 shot stages with a few sighters before you start. I'd be interested to know the results!

Funny you should post this today. Just as the match was finishing up today a discussion fired up among numerous competitors. Someone posed the question whether anyone was doing what we were doing or even attempting to copy it in any appreciable way. There are numerous rimfire tactical matches around the country, to my knowledge none offer steel only. Our targets constitute a large monetary investment, as well as individuals investing sizable amounts of time. At our very first match we offered a paper side match. In many people's opinion it was a failure. I suppose anyone in the club is completely free to start a paper match, no one has. I contend it would never get off the ground. In the discussion at the line today that ensued, most agreed once you have shot steel, nothing compares to the thrill. If paper is all you can do it is certainly better than nothing. Paper will ultimately lead to more specialized equipment. Guys shooting scope powers that are frankly impractical on a trainer due to the desire to not shoot in the dark and see bullet holes. Paper targets are a continual investment. If you gat the right steel, and take care of it, it is a one time investment. Steel that isn't abused will last for many many years. A paper target lasts for one match and then it is trash.
Ultimately it is not my decision to offer paper targets. That decision belongs to Apache308 alone. he is the match director proper and the founder of the feast. I am simply co conspirator and assistant match director. I can assure you I would not add paper to our match if it was my decision, and I am quite sure Apache's proclivities are the same. We ain't gonna fix what ain't broke, and I am fairly certain it would hurt the match participation.
This dot exercise poll is an interesting idea, and I am glad people are thinking of new ways to challenge themselves. This exercise can only evolve into an equipment and ammo race in a match format. We do not even allow rear bags from a prone position...never have. This exercise cannot work at all unless you use a rear bag or a benchrest. It is mostly a test of equipment and ammo. Hate to say it and mean no offense to the OP, it is ultimately a slick way into yet another MOA 22lr debate. The answer is still the same. When JBell moves to Carolina, I will bet you if he shoots TSC one time, shooting dot drills on paper will take a quick back seat to the steel, and he will save his premium ammo for more noble ventures, in the quest for real prizes and not just bragging rights. Bragging rights are nice but round here they only last till the next steel match.
We(not just the match directors either) have spent long hours in phone conversations, and breaking bread together, discussing ways to improve and enhance this match. We have done our homework and have a pretty good handle on what we want and what the competitors want. We have intentionally pushed the competitors and sometimes they didn't like it, but ultimately they have stayed and realized our goal is to put the shooter into the game. Shooting lasers from stable positions is fun...for a very short time. Giving competitors a challenge is a good thing, giving them an insurmountable obstacle only serves to discourage and drive them to another sport. It also ultimately does little for honing their skills if it discourages them. We are proud to say that many breeds of 22lr have won our matches, yes even a Savage by an exceptional shooter, thus indicating we have taken the laser beams out of the equation to some degree.
Yes I printed up targets and had intention of shooting them. I did not have time this weekend, I had a match to help set up, help run, and shoot in, and I am loath to expend my premium ammo, and without premium ammo this exercise is not possible in the least. I may do this before the year is out, but I am in a heated points race and frakly my rig is hard pressed to perform this task if I take my time.

German,
I ran a long standing postal match for 3 years. It was passed to me and had been in existence for many years. Invariably the world is full of greasy characters, you and your honest competitors are at the mercy of those characters. Believe it or not, some people are attention whores and will do uncouth things to insure what I always called an empty victory. Believe it or not, some folks will attempt to gain praise for something they did not earn. This was one of my biggest frustrations as a postal match director. I could give you some glaring examples and if you would like to PM me I can offer some sage advice. Ultimately you will have to tell someone they cheated, and you will not be able to prove that they did. You already have at least 10 percent of your poll that are completely full of shit. This will be the source of massive headaches. Especially if you honestly consider the level of accuracy required is hardly possible by 95% or the 22 rimfires in existence.
Again JBell's rifle is capable and quite a rare piece, and all he can manage is 85%, in my opinion, no where close to "almost" 100%.
Sorry to ramble guys and no ill intent suggested steve123.
 
I agree with the second portion of the above post about the postal match idea. It would take all the fun out of the match to just have a few "rotten eggs" so to speak. I would love to get back into shooting competitively even with postals. Its hard to keep pushing yourself with out competition, I am however very luck to have a good friend in BM11 who can shoot like a SOB so that helps. But a formal competition or match is a different animal especially when you don't know your competition.

I also agree the match should be designed so you don't need the "most accurate" rifle and ammo combo out there. I know I have a very accurate rifle and that boast my confidence level (like I need any more help :) ) but I was very luck to walk into that rifle. I think it would be more fair and funner if we had something that required more shooter input. Like always have enough unsupported shots or weak side shots per COF. Even have some shots that required you to use something like a tripod/shooting sticks ect off hand and seated at 100yds on a MOA - 1.5 MOA target. But I am just throwing stuff out there. It could even keep the cost down to use targets posted on a dedicated thread in a PDF so competitors could just print them and either mail them in or post them up. But these are just some ideas I am throwing out there. I would be willing to help with managing the thing.
 
Funny you should post this today. Just as the match was finishing up today a discussion fired up among numerous competitors. Someone posed the question whether anyone was doing what we were doing or even attempting to copy it in any appreciable way. There are numerous rimfire tactical matches around the country, to my knowledge none offer steel only. Our targets constitute a large monetary investment, as well as individuals investing sizable amounts of time. At our very first match we offered a paper side match. In many people's opinion it was a failure. I suppose anyone in the club is completely free to start a paper match, no one has. I contend it would never get off the ground. In the discussion at the line today that ensued, most agreed once you have shot steel, nothing compares to the thrill. If paper is all you can do it is certainly better than nothing. Paper will ultimately lead to more specialized equipment. Guys shooting scope powers that are frankly impractical on a trainer due to the desire to not shoot in the dark and see bullet holes. Paper targets are a continual investment. If you gat the right steel, and take care of it, it is a one time investment. Steel that isn't abused will last for many many years. A paper target lasts for one match and then it is trash.
Ultimately it is not my decision to offer paper targets. That decision belongs to Apache308 alone. he is the match director proper and the founder of the feast. I am simply co conspirator and assistant match director. I can assure you I would not add paper to our match if it was my decision, and I am quite sure Apache's proclivities are the same. We ain't gonna fix what ain't broke, and I am fairly certain it would hurt the match participation.
This dot exercise poll is an interesting idea, and I am glad people are thinking of new ways to challenge themselves. This exercise can only evolve into an equipment and ammo race in a match format. We do not even allow rear bags from a prone position...never have. This exercise cannot work at all unless you use a rear bag or a benchrest. It is mostly a test of equipment and ammo. Hate to say it and mean no offense to the OP, it is ultimately a slick way into yet another MOA 22lr debate. The answer is still the same. When JBell moves to Carolina, I will bet you if he shoots TSC one time, shooting dot drills on paper will take a quick back seat to the steel, and he will save his premium ammo for more noble ventures, in the quest for real prizes and not just bragging rights. Bragging rights are nice but round here they only last till the next steel match.
We(not just the match directors either) have spent long hours in phone conversations, and breaking bread together, discussing ways to improve and enhance this match. We have done our homework and have a pretty good handle on what we want and what the competitors want. We have intentionally pushed the competitors and sometimes they didn't like it, but ultimately they have stayed and realized our goal is to put the shooter into the game. Shooting lasers from stable positions is fun...for a very short time. Giving competitors a challenge is a good thing, giving them an insurmountable obstacle only serves to discourage and drive them to another sport. It also ultimately does little for honing their skills if it discourages them. We are proud to say that many breeds of 22lr have won our matches, yes even a Savage by an exceptional shooter, thus indicating we have taken the laser beams out of the equation to some degree.
Yes I printed up targets and had intention of shooting them. I did not have time this weekend, I had a match to help set up, help run, and shoot in, and I am loath to expend my premium ammo, and without premium ammo this exercise is not possible in the least. I may do this before the year is out, but I am in a heated points race and frakly my rig is hard pressed to perform this task if I take my time.

German,
I ran a long standing postal match for 3 years. It was passed to me and had been in existence for many years. Invariably the world is full of greasy characters, you and your honest competitors are at the mercy of those characters. Believe it or not, some people are attention whores and will do uncouth things to insure what I always called an empty victory. Believe it or not, some folks will attempt to gain praise for something they did not earn. This was one of my biggest frustrations as a postal match director. I could give you some glaring examples and if you would like to PM me I can offer some sage advice. Ultimately you will have to tell someone they cheated, and you will not be able to prove that they did. You already have at least 10 percent of your poll that are completely full of shit. This will be the source of massive headaches. Especially if you honestly consider the level of accuracy required is hardly possible by 95% or the 22 rimfires in existence.
Again JBell's rifle is capable and quite a rare piece, and all he can manage is 85%, in my opinion, no where close to "almost" 100%.
Sorry to ramble guys and no ill intent suggested steve123.

Well good for you and your club. Stick to what works!

I didn't realize you guys shot all steel. My favorite kind of match BTW.

I was just curious to see what the percentages would be in a match setting. I think I'd be fortunate to get 2-3 out of 5 in light winds.

I just got a new 22, the first 5er was .3 at 50Y with SK standard. Talk about bringing a smile to my face!
 
I agree with the second portion of the above post about the postal match idea. It would take all the fun out of the match to just have a few "rotten eggs" so to speak. I would love to get back into shooting competitively even with postals. Its hard to keep pushing yourself with out competition, I am however very luck to have a good friend in BM11 who can shoot like a SOB so that helps. But a formal competition or match is a different animal especially when you don't know your competition.

I also agree the match should be designed so you don't need the "most accurate" rifle and ammo combo out there. I know I have a very accurate rifle and that boast my confidence level (like I need any more help :) ) but I was very luck to walk into that rifle. I think it would be more fair and funner if we had something that required more shooter input. Like always have enough unsupported shots or weak side shots per COF. Even have some shots that required you to use something like a tripod/shooting sticks ect off hand and seated at 100yds on a MOA - 1.5 MOA target. But I am just throwing stuff out there. It could even keep the cost down to use targets posted on a dedicated thread in a PDF so competitors could just print them and either mail them in or post them up. But these are just some ideas I am throwing out there. I would be willing to help with managing the thing.

I can always post the targets so we can all vote bullshit or not. lol

But yeah, that was my only concern and I know how this goes as there's really no way to prove you did it unless you video yourself doing it. Gunboards had the same type of thing a few years back that I participated in and was 'asked' if these were really my targets and if I really shot at the prescribed range. It hadn't even occurred to me to cheat as there was really nothing to gain (no prizes or anything) so I was confused as to why someone would enter in something to test themselves and cheat; these kind of things really have you cheating yourself the most.
 
ok ok ok !!!!! I have set back an let pl8chikn say it all, I was there when he shot the yote at 211yrds,.I also have been at all the conover 22 TSC matches,
we see it all (makes of rifles, ammo,optics,)used in the match, also must grades of shooters,
can it be done 5 for 5 best answer yes, can it be done 100% of the time best answer NO!!!!.
To many variables. Number one for us at the match is ammo lot#. case in point 6 annies MPR, all as close as same as you can get, same ammo an lot#. do they all shoot the same,HELL NO, like joe said to close to years end an the points race is tight, not going to waste my mojo, ammo right now.
maybe me an the chikn can shoot this after the seasons over for the year.
 
ok ok ok !!!!! I have set back an let pl8chikn say it all, I was there when he shot the yote at 211yrds,.I also have been at all the conover 22 TSC matches,
we see it all (makes of rifles, ammo,optics,)used in the match, also must grades of shooters,
can it be done 5 for 5 best answer yes, can it be done 100% of the time best answer NO!!!!.
To many variables. Number one for us at the match is ammo lot#. case in point 6 annies MPR, all as close as same as you can get, same ammo an lot#. do they all shoot the same,HELL NO, like joe said to close to years end an the points race is tight, not going to waste my mojo, ammo right now.
maybe me an the chikn can shoot this after the seasons over for the year.
LMAO!!! chkn finally got you sucked in... I wish I could make those matches (or just one of them). Seems like little to no 40X presence there! Maybe I can get rrflyer or some other 40X TX boys together for a roadtrip...
 
Ricos, we have had a few 40x show up over the years, yep one shot pretty good, after a scope change,(note BSA dont work in this game).
dont know your setup, but need 20 MOA base, not good ammo but great ammo, know your dope.
come an shot the match one time an you will be hooked. like has been said best bunch of shooters this side of the smokies,
an ol yea the chikin an i are friends, he has seen about all you can think of about the 22lr, if you dont belive me just ask him, ha,ha,ha!!!
just poking the bear joe,
 
I actually shoot a Cricket that has been heavily modified with a 47" barrel, airsoft stock and a Mil-Spec Countersniper optic. The trigger needed work and I have it down to a smooth 6.2381 pounds now. Holds MOA at 475 yards all day long with Remington Bulk (lot number 987654321) if I do my part.
 
Yea Yea
done heard about you ant trick me, was told it was a 36 in cricket with 4x pistol scope, an it will kill buffs at half mile LOL

Hope you guys can make a match if not by oct this year maybe 2014
love to see some 40x on the line, not been lucky enought to fine someone willing to part with a 40x round these parts,no joke would love to get my hands on one
 
German:
It will work fine if you have a witness sign the target, as long as the witness has a little pedigree, we required they be a member of our organization or an NRA member. That does hurt participation from some though, cause we can't always get together to shoot with a friend, and wives are often members of neither. If you need help I will help you any way I can. ONe good thing about the dot drill is each shot is accounted for, not so with group shooting. There is quite a difference in what my match was and what yours will be. The big thing with this one will be distance and getting someone to witness the distance. Hell any one of us including the French models can do this at 25-50yds.

Rico it would please me greatly for a bunch of you fellers from Texas to get together for a road trip to Conover. I promise you would be treated like royalty.

I am proud to see ol Yoteman finally post a bit. Recently we have been trying to give him a rash of shit(hey we gotta do something, sure can't outshoot him) and have appropriately named him Gretel. Yes she is a true witch hunter but she ain't out of the woods yet :D One more performance like he made this past Saturday and the breadcrumbs will be a moot point."THe Hat" is a coveted item and there is only one like it in the world. It may mean little to those not associated with our match but it is a trophy to those who do shoot the match. Any man that wins the hat can wear it with pride, and that person is the real deal in the shooting world. Oh sure 2nd and 3rd for "shooter of the year" will get a nice trophy and nothing to sneeze at believe me. Right now I will settle for worst of the best...I hope. Many a slip twixt a cup and a lip.
 
YOU ARE RIGHT, ARMORPL8CHIKN, not over yet 2 more to go, An if you dont mind please leave me some more bread crums to follow LOL
YEA the trophys are nice, BUT THE HAT well lets just say it is the real prize. by the way does it come in one size fits all, are is adj for a swelled head.
last 2 stages had me thinking you were going to pull it off, NOW NO JOKING IF ITS NOT ME I HOPE ITS YOU ARE STEVE.just happy to be around good friends,
by the way got any of my lot# u want to sell come on hook a brother up hehehe
 
I am not gonna trip you, goose you, or intentionally sabotage you....and I sure as heck ain't gonna enable you by selling you any more of that ammo. Go ahead and cry, cause I am gonna use it for hunting squack this fall. NO SOUP FOR YOU! :D

Sorry about the highjack German. I am done.