• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Lilja barrel; how much of a difference would it seriously make?

TheGerman

Oberleutnant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Jan 25, 2010
    10,608
    30,199
    the Westside
    Been kicking this around for a while and then went on to other things like coyote hunting and ELR shooting, but am not getting back into some rimfire.

    I have a 455VPT with the Manners stock, a Timney trigger and a Vortex Viper PST; looks like the only thing that could really get the maximum accuracy out of this thing now at 100-200 would be a different barrel. Maybe.

    If some of you followed my post last year where I shot 20+ different types of 22LR and recorded 10 group strings, you can see that at times, with the right ammo I could come well under 1" at 100 with some ultra small groupings that were sub .5" at 100. My problem seemed to be that A. it REALLY depended on the ammo as we all know B. while the better ammo was consistently better, it wasn't super all of the time - for example, I would shoot a >1" group and then the next 2 or 3 would be right at an inch and then it would go back down/over, etc with an occasional flier.

    Question is, I know the Lilja barrel is a custom barrel. But how much of an improvement would I realistically see over the stock CZ barrel? This is what I am on the fence about.
     
    In order to obtain accuracy from a Lilja 22lr,
    you have to use match grade ammo.
    That hand lapped bore requires no break in,
    and from a test rest/barrel block will provide a
    consistent 0.75 moa or less at 100 yards
    under calm wind conditions.

    That the answer y'er looking for?
     
    Last edited:
    LOL.... About .003-005 per 100.00 spent..... If you have a .22 shooting < 1" at 100 you will have to be really serious about that last little bit to go further....
     
    Just like anything competition/performance oriented,
    if you are looking for the absolute best results,
    then you make the effort to find and use the
    items that will provide those results.
    Accuracy costs money.


    That's not to say that you can't win
    the factory production line lottery
    and get a rifle that shoots 1/4 moa out of the box,
    but the chances of that are slim to none.
     
    Last edited:
    At the US Army Marksmanship Unit we sent ammo technicians to Europe and Scandinavia to buy rimfire ammo in lots. The only way you can proof it is by shooting it.

    Our acceptance standard was 12mm or smaller 10-shot groups at (I believe) 50 Meters through barrels from Anschutz, Krieger (cut-rifled), Lilja, and a number of other brands.

    This ammo supports rimfire 3-position shooting under International Shooting Sports Foundation (Olympic format), NRA, and NRA 100-yard prone rules.
     
    I have done 6 lilja 455's in 22 LR and will have another in 17 hmr very soon. With match ammo and properly setup .2's at 50 yards is the average. I've only shot 2 groups with my personal rifle at 100 yards using eley edge and shot a .555" group and another in the .6's. The best I've seen so far from a bone stock 455 was high .5's average at 50 yards using match ammo.

    The price of a lilja isn't cheap but when you really think about it, the barrel is a bargain! It comes fully done ready to go for $395. I have contacted other proven barrel makers about doing a barrel for the 455. Shilen had no interest, bartlien wanted north of $500 in chrome moly (not stainless), krieger had no interest, and on another forum someone contacted walther and the price would have also been in the $300's. The barrel isn't for everyone as many don't wanna spend the cash on it or the ammo to feed it but those that don't mind it need one in there life :).
     
    I have done 6 lilja 455's in 22 LR and will have another in 17 hmr very soon. With match ammo and properly setup .2's at 50 yards is the average. I've only shot 2 groups with my personal rifle at 100 yards using eley edge and shot a .555" group and another in the .6's. The best I've seen so far from a bone stock 455 was high .5's average at 50 yards using match ammo.

    The price of a lilja isn't cheap but when you really think about it, the barrel is a bargain! It comes fully done ready to go for $395. I have contacted other proven barrel makers about doing a barrel for the 455. Shilen had no interest, bartlien wanted north of $500 in chrome moly (not stainless), krieger had no interest, and on another forum someone contacted walther and the price would have also been in the $300's. The barrel isn't for everyone as many don't wanna spend the cash on it or the ammo to feed it but those that don't mind it need one in there life :).

    Yeah you're about where I was, high 5's to just under 1" average at 100.

    Eley Edge and Lapua Midas were the best for me.

    May have to try a Lilja and see.
     
    Lilja bbl CZ

    At the US Army Marksmanship Unit we sent ammo technicians to Europe and Scandinavia to buy rimfire ammo in lots. The only way you can proof it is by shooting it.

    Our acceptance standard was 12mm or smaller 10-shot groups at (I believe) 50 Meters through barrels from Anschutz, Krieger (cut-rifled), Lilja, and a number of other brands.

    This ammo supports rimfire 3-position shooting under International Shooting Sports Foundation (Olympic format), NRA, and NRA 100-yard prone rules.

    I don't want to hijack the thread but Sinister's report of ammo testing for selection of 22lr match ammo piqued my interest. You mentioned Europe and Scandinavia to test ammo. Would you please give us some more info about those tests? Which brands were being tested (i.e. Lapua, Eley, Olymp, RWS, etc. and how did they stack up? You described some premium barrels used for testing but did not describe the firearms. Are we talking about custom match rifles like a Turbo or Hall or Factory rifles with custom bbl's like the CZ-Lilja combo or a Rem 40x with match bbl?

    I just wanted to get a little more context into the comment as well as learn what sort of equipment your test technicians were using and the test methods. i.e. complete firearm fired from sandbags? complete firearm fired from prone with sling? complete firearm clamped into a machine rest or a test barrel clamped into a test jig? I was asking as I was told how some Olympic shooting sports teams come to Eley to test ammo lots and use a clamping machine rest so point of aim is the same each shot and they shoot at an indoor facility so wind is not a factor. Each uses their competition rifle so the ammo is matched to the gun. Some of my BR shooting friends test ammo lots but do it under the same conditions we plan to compete in. i.e. Complete rifle fired from 1 or 2 piece rest outdoors.

    Based on what I have seen with custom BR guns compared to high quality factory guns shooting at 50yds,for example: my factory Remington 540XR is capable of shooting an IR50/50 tgt scoring a 248/12x. It will not do that every time. Runs 243 to 248 most of the time. I shot a string of 25, five shot groups in a row onto a single USBR tgt last week with it. Ammo was SK std plus, Eley Black and Wolf Match Extra, with about 1/3rd from each. Best group was 0.217" (5.5mm/0.415 MOA) with average for all 25 being 0.349" (8.9mm/0.666 MOA). Not great but very representative of what it is capable of at 50yds shooting from a 2 piece rest, with good but not the best ammo. A custom Turbo action with Jewel trigger, and Shilein bbl using 36x optic from a 1 piece micrometer rest shoots IR50/50 tgt (same day & conditions as me) scoring 250/20x (match winner), using Eley Black ammo. Some of that is more experienced shooter and some is rifle, rest, etc. Some of it is the barrel. How much? That rifle will print groups that are averaging 0.224" or a fraction larger for 25 shots in a row with aimed fire in outdoor conditions. That is the worst it can shoot and score a 250/20x on the IR50/50 tgt. A Hall action with Rock Creek bbl jewel trigger and Night Force tgt scope shoots about the same as the Turbo. Another Turbo with Lilja bbl shoots better than the other two and has scored 2450pts on the ARA tgt. All those were using Eley black. There are not many factory actions that will shoot that well regardless of the bbl they are fitted with. Too many other variables in the fit and finish of the bolt, receiver, ignition system, etc. The gunsmiths who will be honest with us will tell us that even with a stack of 20 match grade bbls, there will only be about 10% of them that are really great, with the diameter tapering down from largest at the breech to smallest at the crown. You might want to slug your CZ bbl and see what you have now before removing it.

    Based on what the OP is getting with his gun already, he might see a small improvement with a well fit Lilja bbl. Would likely see some groups that are .250" at 50yds, some may even be better. The average for a long string of 5 or 6 groups is not likely to be that good. But that should get him to a close to 1/2" or slightly bigger at 100yds? The longer the distance the more the environment, wind, temp, humidity begins to affect results. I would guess average of 0.600 to 0.800 MOA. We have seen CZ/Lilja's that will shoot better than that. It really will come down to whether you get one of the killer barrels or one of the 90%. I give you a 10:1 chance.

    Irish
     
    there will only be about 10% of them that are really great, with the diameter tapering down from largest at the breech to smallest at the crown.

    From my reading, one of the reasons for hand lapping a barrel
    is to obtain that desired taper from breech to muzzle.
    Lapping is done after the rifling has been cut, but before
    the blank is machined, so as to be able to determine
    (by feel/resistance by the technician) which end is where
    the bore is larger and should become the breech.
     
    Last edited:
    Lilja bbl CZ

    From my reading, one of the reasons for hand lapping a barrel
    is to obtain that desired taper from breech to muzzle.
    Lapping is done after the rifling has been cut, but before
    the blank is machined, so as to be able to determine
    (by feel/resistance by the technician) which end is where
    the bore is larger and should become the breech.

    That is correct. Find the tight spot and saw it off there. Smooth the rifling so that it tapers gradually from breech to crown, then cut to length and cut the crown & chamber. That is the goal of any match grade bbl that has been hand lapped and fitted. But there are match grade barrels and match grade barrels. Some or more equal than others to steal a phrase from animal farm.

    And to be sure, when I made my comment, I was referring to match grade barrel blanks. Not to finished barrels. But I suppose it still applies to them also. A lot of science and some witchcraft goes into the mfg and selection of the best barrel blanks for match fitting. Some even claim that the metallurgy of the blank will affect its harmonics and that some lots of steel make better bbls than others. A lot of speculation and theory by gun builders who know tons more than me go into the process and even with all of that effort, some are great shooters and some just never perform up to their potential. That is not a knock on Lilja, as Shilein, Douglas, Rock Creek, Walther, and others all have the same issues. It is part science and part art, and this injects variables into the production process that are not fully understood or controlled.

    Usually a match grade bbl will improve the performance of the gun simply because of the extra care that went into its production. A friend of mine who is a well known smith in the varmint rifle, LRP rifle circles used to swear by Walther blanks for his 22lr projects. He said they were all "Perfect". Lately Mueller and Shilein Ratchet bbls are the hot commodity. They will be until somebody comes up with the next innovation. Lilja is one of the best. You could do a lot worse. And it should shoot better and it might shoot killer good. If it does enjoy it.

    Irish
     
    As a circumstantial answer, while this certainly isn't gospel, a lot of rounds have been fired now in my 6x5 shoot out, and a lot of data has been collected. You may look here: http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...re-6-groups-5-30-rounds-challenge-thread.html

    The best 6 group average at 50 yards with a CZ 455 VPT/Lilja is 0.257". The best factory CZ 455 VPT group average is 0.428". There are QUITE a few CZ's represented if you want to look through the compiled results, and you will notice you have to go through QUITE a few Liljas before you get to the first factory barrel.

    In conclusion- if you are shooting offhand, or plinking at cans, or shooting bulk ammo, and that's it, it might not be worth the cash for the barrel. Otherwise, there is a huge difference in accuracy. Most barrels turn out a good group every now and again but if you stop cherry picking and start looking at averages, the difference is definitely tangible.
     
    Last edited:
    There was a time I thought about a CZ with a Lilja barrel. I have no experience nor anything tangible to offer in the way of actual data. I think BM11 has offered the data and I thank him for the contribution to lists of ACTUAL equipment tests, that is what we have with BM11's program, phenominal data.

    All that fluffery aside, I will answer "is the juice worth the squeeze" question.

    If you want bragging rights in the 6x5 game it seems on the surface not really worth the squeeze unless you will be using this barrel for other endeavors, or you have plenty of expendable income. If you were to take it to our match in Conover, where any given month April-September, you have the potential to win $150+ in one match? Yeah, every fraction of an inch counts, and it is worth teh squeeze, if it puts you consistently in the money.
     
    Last edited:
    it is worth the squeeze, if it puts you consistently in the money.

    And, as a learning tool. There reaches a point in skill development
    where you can't tell if those small errors are being caused by you
    or by the limitations of the rifle. When you finally do shoot with a
    rifle that is capable of consistent accuracy, you can tell immediately
    if a change in what you're doing is improving or degrading the
    results at the target. Having a Lilja has helped me diagnose
    and eliminate many bad habits behind the trigger. So even an
    ignorant neophyte, like me, can justify the cost of a Lilja barrel.
    It's an educational expense, just not tax deductible.
     
    Last edited: