The Dispossession of White America in 13 Maps
- Thread starter Nik H
- Start date
One of our resident closet progressive ninny sissies may report you to the Southern Poverty Center for even posting this!
Just gonna nip that argument in the bud before it pops up to accuse me of being a fucking bigot for being concerned with the illegal immigration problem in this country.
^^^
fucking bigot.
I was on High Road for 24 hours before the San Francisco admin banned me til the 28th or whenever. I guess he didn't like me pointing him out as a capitulator and not a fighter like me.
I found some of those maps pretty eye opening. Others were as expected.
I'm mildly curious about the one that says there's such a large Korean-speaking population in my state and trying to figure out why that is.
I'm hesitant to assign too complete of a blame for the negative changes in this country to the folks with darker skin tones increasing in population.
Most of the time when I see wacked out SJW freaks with zero tolerance for anybody who doesn't exactly worship their specific dogma, it more often than not tends to be some pale face, usually very pale face that never really had to work for a living at a hard job.
Then when I look at most of theDemocrat Communist leadership and politicians as well as the Elites & mega wealthy, that think we should bow down to them and be their unarmed serfs.... again usually pale face rich.
The most SJW fanatic hollywood types pushing all the illegal immigration and gun grabbing and communist country destroying nonsense more often than not tend to be pale face rich spoiled entitled brats and more often than not female.
When you see the big rallies for Communist candidates that want to make America Venezuela, you'll find them filled with young pale faces, generally folks still living off their parent's money or off loans.
When you see some in your face, you must love us or else, sexual deviants, you'll probably notice a greater than normal percentage of pale faces.
If anything I'd suggest paleface females are actually more dangerous to the cause of liberty than most ones with darker skin tones.
Most of the time when I see wacked out SJW freaks with zero tolerance for anybody who doesn't exactly worship their specific dogma, it more often than not tends to be some pale face, usually very pale face that never really had to work for a living at a hard job.
Then when I look at most of the
The most SJW fanatic hollywood types pushing all the illegal immigration and gun grabbing and communist country destroying nonsense more often than not tend to be pale face rich spoiled entitled brats and more often than not female.
When you see the big rallies for Communist candidates that want to make America Venezuela, you'll find them filled with young pale faces, generally folks still living off their parent's money or off loans.
When you see some in your face, you must love us or else, sexual deviants, you'll probably notice a greater than normal percentage of pale faces.
If anything I'd suggest paleface females are actually more dangerous to the cause of liberty than most ones with darker skin tones.
Got to further shore up the position.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
VA Governor: 'We Welcome Refugee Resettlement In Virginia' | The Gateway Pundit | by Eric A. Blair
Democratic Gov.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Got to further shore up the position.
VA Governor: 'We Welcome Refugee Resettlement In Virginia' | The Gateway Pundit | by Eric A. Blair
Democratic Gov.
Once again, if you look at it more clearly, it's an Elitist, Rich, Communist, Entitled Pale Face that is the true enemy, they are just using poor or more troubled people as pawns in their agenda and they don't like them at all, they just use them as puppets for as long as they need them and use them to stir up racial tensions to keep the hoi poi from realizing they should all be getting together with the torches and pitchforks at the Elitist's castles/mansions.
Communist gains would not be possible without the huge growth of the non-white population.
ropercenter.cornell.edu
How Groups Voted in 2016 | Roper Center for Public Opinion Research
How Groups Voted in 2016
America needs a birth rate slightly higher than the death rate because we need some growth in population to sustain the economy (Western Europe's birthrate was so low that the 'leaders' turned to an immigration invasion to fix that), and as long as Caucasian women keep betraying America by not having at least 3 kids each, we need lawful immigrants to fill the role.
As long as the lawful immigrants are chosen on merit and not chain migration, and have an American perspective and not a democrat/RINO view- I'm fine with it, regardless of their Race or Ethnicity.
But we need to have a national conversation about "democrat created white genocide", and it should be like the anti-smoking, anti-drunk driving, and anti-drug, public information campaigns.
As long as the lawful immigrants are chosen on merit and not chain migration, and have an American perspective and not a democrat/RINO view- I'm fine with it, regardless of their Race or Ethnicity.
But we need to have a national conversation about "democrat created white genocide", and it should be like the anti-smoking, anti-drunk driving, and anti-drug, public information campaigns.
Last edited:
Eventually old black face wont be able to leave his urban enclaves without fear of being subject to citizens arrest and asset forfeiture for having been a usurper of the law and breaker of his oath.
There will come a time when its all gone too far.
The Immigration Act of 1965 was passed by the democrats because they knew it would change our demographics to favor their anti-American political goals; Repubs opposed it and rightly predicted the law would alter our demographics, but the dems had the majorities and LBJ in the WH, and it passed.
It ended merit based immigration from mainly European nations and started chain migration from Latin America, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. History shows the switch was away from immigrants much better able to culturally assimilate, to poorer, lesser educated people who'd be much more dependent on government assistance- a w3t dr3@m for the dems.
Non- Hispanic Caucasians were just over 80 percent of the population before the Imm. Act of '65, and after it passed that percentage immediately started dropping, to the just over 60 percent we are now. The democrats intentionally destroyed America's demographics for political gain.
It ended merit based immigration from mainly European nations and started chain migration from Latin America, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. History shows the switch was away from immigrants much better able to culturally assimilate, to poorer, lesser educated people who'd be much more dependent on government assistance- a w3t dr3@m for the dems.
Non- Hispanic Caucasians were just over 80 percent of the population before the Imm. Act of '65, and after it passed that percentage immediately started dropping, to the just over 60 percent we are now. The democrats intentionally destroyed America's demographics for political gain.
Last edited:
Two Centuries of US Immigration Vizualized
Watch 200 years of U.S. immigration history in one animated map. Migration flows are visualized as colored dots, each one representing 10,000 people.
metrocosm.com
Exactly- it snowballs because that's how chain migration works- for every lawful immigrant, they have about 20 relatives who also follow, and each one of them have 20 relatives, so the numbers grow exponentially. Chain migration is nothing less than white genocide, but it's really hurting Black Americans the most due to the economics of it all. If it weren't for the Imm. Act of '65, both White and Black Americans would be in a much better situation overall, and race relations would be better, too.
The High Road... That place has had a pretty turbulent and troubled history. Oleg Volk, one of the most fiery and adamant supporters of RKBA, had started it and when he ran the boards himself along with a couple of his close friends, it was REALLY good. When he sold the brand to new corporate owners who ran it like an ISP, that was when it went downhill FAST. And I mean it took the express train to Fuddville in no time. To make matters worse, one of his co-founders sued HIM claiming that the idea and layout for THR had been stolen by HIM from them. The lawsuit dragged on for at least 2 years and during that time, there were 2 THR domains. The main one at .org, with access to the entire archives, and a second one at .us, moderated and operated by Volk himself, but no access to the library. Both parties must have worked out some sort of compromise because now, the .us domain has gone and it is back to one site again, as Fudd as it ever can be. The entire thing must have been a totally fucked up shit show for Volk, who is as standfast about protecting and preserving the 2nd Amendment as any of us here.
Last edited:
I was banned for using Charlie Foxtrot and WTH in the same day. Never bothered to go back.
Fuck Al PacinoTinfoil Hatters!
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
I also got rid of all premium channels.
There's nothing worse than working 80 hours a week, sit down to relax wanting to watch a movie only to find HBO,Showtime and the rest of them with some shitty liberal documentary or series on politics.
Similar threads
