Recent content by AJ300MAG

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! Where do I start... First off, I'm not your yes man or a leg humper. If you have issues because I don't agree with you, too fuckin bad. You ask for opinions, I've CLEARLY stated mine. Secondly I couldn't care less about reading about your...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So some people have said. The reality is, at most tac rifle matches guys shoot next to other guys with brakes. It's part of the match and they deal...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! 3.4.2 Optics – Field Precision Rifle optics are restricted to 1X – 25X magnification power ranges only

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! Mike the only dumb rules seem to be their own... Bullet weight restrictions, scope magnification restrictions, ammo length restrictions, bipod weight restrictions geeze. The only rule the NRA wants is the muzzle attachments. Take the damn...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! Muzzle brakes have never allowed in F-Class, FPR isn't currently a subclass in F-Class.

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I personally find people like AJ300 the norm, and frankly have no interest in shooting alongside people like that.</div></div> Awe Frank, you're...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If a guy invests in a brake that needs to be timed pulling it off is not an option...</div></div> BULLSHIT!!! If the brake isn't timed using a crush...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When you add equipment conundrums to the <span style="font-weight: bold">already tediously boring F class format</span> that is a deal breaker when...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! So what's the solution?

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! IF you have enough shooters to fill a relay it wouldn't be an issue. Might be different elsewhere, we've had only 3 tactical shooters attend our matches last year. They fired in their respective classes (F-TR & F-Open) their rifles weren't...

Re: Field Precision Rifle Class Concept Approved! My own persornal observations... F-Class has drifted too far from the original intent and concept of the discipline. F-Open is a step too far, let alone F-Class Benchrest (which shouldn't even be considered under the F-Class classification)...

Re: Tight neck for f class Ftr I've got to turn the dates to the club. I'll let you know as soon as their published. It would be fantastic to see a .308 shoot those kind of groups. We've been down that road on this site before with people posting photos of groups supposedly that small. Most...

Re: Tight neck for f class Ftr Yep, we've got a couple of target frames at the end of the line that doesn't have benches...

Re: Tight neck for f class Ftr <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turbo54</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Moreover, I KNOW better than 1/4 MOA accuracy can be achieved without neck turning and tight neck chambers...</div></div> Tell ya what, I run the...

Re: Tight neck for f class Ftr I've been running a chamber that has a .340" neck. Taking just enough off the neck of Lapua brass for full clean-up the loaded round measures .337"~.3365". I haven't had any loading issues after firing 100 rounds+ through the barrel. I can chamber and fire...