Recent content by almsquattro

Sorry Mountainman. Is it too late to order? I’m in for 3 if still possible. I would be sending a MO as soon as you can confirm. Thanks.

Re: Inconceivable? Now this is getting comical. Killswitch engage- you can't be serious. Come on dude. Relax. Brush that mullet, step outside your trailer, "squeeze" a couple of Coors Lights, and go play some Call of Duty on your friends Nintendo. Well, we did go out this past weekend and...

Re: Inconceivable? Just for clarification, I'm going to quote myself; <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: almsquattro</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Being a novice, but understanding the generally accepted ranging formula (target size in inches X...

Re: Inconceivable? Redmanss, all due respect, but your ADHD is laughable. Or has it progressed to anterograde amnesia? (Go ahead. Look it up.) How many times do I have to keep reminding you that I'm not talking accuracy? I'm just asking if it is ever "possible" to see a person sized object...

Re: Inconceivable? Sand Warrior.....conceivable? It sure sounds like it. For those who disagree, please explain to me how (in perfect conditions) a man size (or even deer size) object just disappears if it is smaller than 1 (or even 2) MOA? And if the image of the man size object doesn't...

Re: Inconceivable? Well according to this tactical training video clip, it is completely "inconceivable" that anyone can see an average height person through a scope that measures 1 minute of angle on the reticle. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D58LpHBnvsI

Re: Inconceivable? 3.6 miles.

Re: Inconceivable? Okay guys, we are not talking about accuracy or ballistics here. I was just asked "what is the extreme limits of ranging with a ranging reticle". Based on the ranging calculations, in perfect conditions, if you see a 5'10" tall person and he is 1 MOA according to your...

Re: Inconceivable? I believe it to be tMOA and I know the formula is slightly different. I understand the margin of error will be increase exponentially at greater distances but the calculation would be a bit better than a WAG (wild a__ guess). And reading the limitations of most laser...

Re: Inconceivable? So the calculation is not flawed, and it is possible to see and range a person 4 miles away (on my 22X scope). Thanks Drifter.

The question was asked "what are the limitations of ranging with your reticle?" Being a novice, but understanding the generally accepted ranging formula (target size in inches X 100/minutes of angle = distance in yards), I calculated a hypothetical math problem. Using an average height person 5...

Re: Savage Retrofit non-Accutrigger with Accutrigger I appreciate the input gentlemen. I will definitely forgo the Accutrigger. I guess it will be a toss-up between the Sharp Shooters Supply and the Rifle Basix Sav-2....

Re: Savage Retrofit non-Accutrigger with Accutrigger Thanks Chadwick. You are probably right; however, in addition to price, The Accutrigger appears to be a good balance of adjustability and safety.

I have a Savage (pre-Accutrigger) 110FP Tactical .308 rifle and would like to retrofit it with an Accutrigger. In speaking to Savage reps, they said I cannot "readily" retrofit a pre-Accutrigger rifle. Now, I know that sometimes reps are told by attorneys what to say because of things like...