- Thread starter misser
- Start date
Nice promo of your product and website there.
Do you have a commercial account?
No?
Bye.
Do you have a commercial account?
No?
Bye.
I found it works
You took a shot and missed
Are you a non English speaker or a engineer or something ?
You could have posted in the Black Friday thread and been fine
You could have posted in the Black Friday thread and been fine
I ordered one yesterday as well. I always wanted to try one on my PRS rig. Fingers crossed!
Does anyone know what the real difference between the NextGen and PRS brakes? The website isn't really clear about it.
Ok, I know they look different and the PRS has a 90deg first port. But which one will reduce the recoil the most. Was the NextGen a newer design?
thats a good question . i dont know if eric did any testing as in comparing with any test equipment to show how much difference there is. i am sure some one will . . youtube will likely have some thing before to long. mine will be here in a few days ,not that i can do any quality control testing
ahhh..ok, that is good to know! thanks
I love suppressors and have several. I have shot several PRS matches with them, but the problem is they on average only reduce recoil by 21% in my testing and my muzzle brakes are over 60%. So spotting misses and making adjustments is just easier with a muzzle brake.I’ll stick with a suppressor…
Did they publish the results anywhere?
That's all I was told
PRS or Nextgen?
nextgen ,,,,,,,,,,,all ready have the prs
Cool, keep us posted on how they compare!
Ok, so I ran a test with my EC Tuner Brake Next Gen 6mm on my 6GT. I was testing how much recoil reduction it had compared to my suppressor, Precision Armament Hyper Tap and bare muzzle. I ran the test with my MPA 6GT bolt gun on sled.
Recoil Results
No Brake - 16.5 inches
Suppressor - 13 inches (22% Reduction)
EC Tuner Next Gen 6mm - 8 inches (52% Reduction)
PA Hypertap - 6.5 inches (61% Reduction)
I did not get a chance to do a tune test, but hope to do that in the next couple weeks.
Recoil Results
No Brake - 16.5 inches
Suppressor - 13 inches (22% Reduction)
EC Tuner Next Gen 6mm - 8 inches (52% Reduction)
PA Hypertap - 6.5 inches (61% Reduction)
I did not get a chance to do a tune test, but hope to do that in the next couple weeks.
Could you post a video of this test & how you did it? I'm curious & would like to replicate it w/ my rifle & devices etc
Sorry I don't have a video of this test, it was starting to rain. But I added a video of a test I did awhile back. It is easy to replicate, because it isn't the most high tech test method! I took a gun vice and added wheels to the bottom of it. I clamped my rifle in it is so it couldn't move, then I got smooth board and placed the gun vice on it. I marked the starting position and fired the rifle 3 times with each muzzle device. I would measure the distance traveled and average the three numbers. With my rifle and a roughly 8oz trigger, I would use a pen and just touch the trigger setting off the round. This way I was not influencing the numbers by pulling the trigger. Although as long as they were all influenced the same, it wouldn't matter.
Cool, post the results! Also, if you use casters, make sure they are all pointed in the same direction.OK, got it. I'm going to test a Vais brake vs Dead Air Sandman vs Hawkins 3 port brake
Last edited:
So I did my tuner testing on my match load. My starting point with my Ultradyne Muzzle Brake was .37in group. I removed it put the EC Tuner Next Gen on and started at Zero. I went up by two until I came back to zero. So 2,4,6,8 and then 0 again which shot the same size group as the original zero group. At setting 2 on the not most steady of benches at my indoor 100yd range I shot a .218 group, at 4 it was .26. Setting 8 was the worst group at .48. I then came back to setting 2 and dropped a .13 inch group....I left it there! I then zero'd my turrets and took one final shot to confirm zero. I am very happy with the way this thing took my .37 inch group and brought it down to a .13 - .21 inch groups!!
Attachments
Two rounds is what EC suggested, but yes I agree with you. But I actual did a 5 round group on setting 2. I did 2 rounds, then tested the other settings and came back to setting 2 for two more rounds, then a final shot at setting 2 and my worst spread was .21. So I feel pretty good with it.
Similar threads
