I would not, I want fair elections where people vote once, in person with I.D.
- Thread starter Animal357
- Start date
First off the election was stolen and politicians on both sides are disgusting. Now to play your game.
Let’s pretend all was fair and the masses vote to support the things that have been happening such as gov’t sanctioned molesting and abusing children in schools, forced business closures on a whim, forced shots, letting criminals out of prisons to prey on the vulnerable, and the “legal” targeting of those that oppose this one world gov’t agenda. Does a man just hand over his children to the mob because it’s the will of the people or in our case, their representatives, solidified by a free and fair election? Do you believe in the constitution enough to accept the evil that manifested either because of or in spite of it? Is a good man supposed to accept evil because it’s the law set forth by earthly men?
I’ll grant you! They are that fuckin stupid. At least 60 percent!
The powers that be decided Nancy had to go. That's why the red team was allowed to win the House. Politicians don't lose unless they piss of the wrong people or someone else pays a higher price. She is becoming a liability and needed to be removed. Also, now that team red is in control, they can start to cull the freedom caucus in 24 by anchoring Trump around their necks. Both sides are coming for Trump, and by extension you.
Time to rid the country of the second Tea Party also known as the MAGA party. Cuz the establishment doesn't want America to be Great.
Remember how many people went along with mask mandates, shutting down business over Rona scare tactics.
What's funny is people saying "voting rules"..
No.
It's voting LAW
And several states broke their existing election law. And are STILL doing so.
No.
It's voting LAW
And several states broke their existing election law. And are STILL doing so.
they will have control over the purse of the country but since they are just as corrupt as the dims nothing good will come of it just like them having
the ability to pull people in to an over site commit y the only difference is they will not have the numbers to impeach anyone or prosecute anyone so it's only a show and they are happy about it . it's a pathetic attempt to make it look like they are going to do something while they are taking naps again till the next election when they wake up to beg for more money and start that process all over again .
the ability to pull people in to an over site commit y the only difference is they will not have the numbers to impeach anyone or prosecute anyone so it's only a show and they are happy about it . it's a pathetic attempt to make it look like they are going to do something while they are taking naps again till the next election when they wake up to beg for more money and start that process all over again .
America is simply being run over by the blue new wave. Your rights will be fucked even harder in the future.
Anti life, anti gun, pro illegal immigration, pro drugs and million $$$ support for Ukraine.This is what your future looks like. Not to mention the 17000 mile trips with Xi dick sucker Jinping. Biden can tell you a story about that LOL.
Hopefully enough motivation for people to vote in 2024 LOL
Anti life, anti gun, pro illegal immigration, pro drugs and million $$$ support for Ukraine.This is what your future looks like. Not to mention the 17000 mile trips with Xi dick sucker Jinping. Biden can tell you a story about that LOL.
Hopefully enough motivation for people to vote in 2024 LOL
Having the Republicans control the house means the communists don’t control it.
We can’t just cede power in the political domain to the degenerate filth on the other side.
And maybe, depending on what happens in the Senate, we get another two years without an AWB and the disruption it will cause to the firearms, ammo, and components market
We can’t just cede power in the political domain to the degenerate filth on the other side.
And maybe, depending on what happens in the Senate, we get another two years without an AWB and the disruption it will cause to the firearms, ammo, and components market
Do you know what control means in regard to the house and senate? it means controlling the vote …plain and simple, you don’t control the house if you don’t control the vote if the republicans have one more seat in the house but the democrats have 3 republicans in their pocket, who controls the house…….. ?
We want fair and non-corrupt elections because that's what we've been promised.....
The sooner the entire country understands that it's actually orchestrated theater, and that government is going to do whatever they damned well please - the sooner people will stop believing in fairy tales about "red waves" and begin doing what needs to be done.
Funny how they forgot to put their finger on the scale in New York and that was the state the "red wave" actually materialized in. That's the State that ended up handing Republican's the House, lol.
Once you walk past the cardboard cutouts the potemkin village becomes obvious.
Once you walk past the cardboard cutouts the potemkin village becomes obvious.
"If voting made a difference they wouldn't let us do it." -Mark Twain
Voting is nothing more than mob rule, and yet your votes have never mattered. We posses anti-tyrant tools but are too cowardly to do anything about a government that has a monopoly on violence. The world is shit, good luck.
Which is exactly which they kept control of the Senate, and made sure there were no, or limited, MAGA/Tea party candidates to cause trouble with their grand plan. I posted a while ago about 30 minutes from Schweikert on how irresponsible the government is. We are literally borrowing over 43K per second. Not spending, borrowing. We borrowed 1.375 Trillion last year alone, and no it isn't coming back in "Build Back Better". Between shutting down the (productive) energy sector, giving away our innovations for free instead of selling for profit (esp. China), plus "foreign aid" and misc. "virtue signaling" this country is finished in greatness. At the current status quo, we will basically be breaking even on just paying back the interest. Call it want you want, this is intentional destruction of the USA. It doesn't have to be that way, it was chosen to be that way. It could still be reversed, but it won't be. We are doomed. I highly recommend this is watched its painful, its sad, but its "grown-up reality".
The title here is VERY misleading. Its not about elections, its about the course of this country, and the Republican party is as guilty as Dems for playing along:
So whats your grand and Noble solution?
Lots of complaining and negativity no direction on how to “fix” it?
Solutions> random bitching.
Please. See the movie "2000 Mules". Then read Ted Cruzs' book: "justice Corrupted".
I am going to write in Mickey Mouse and Pluto for our president and vice president……
What’s the fucking difference?
Until election laws are changed I will no longer participate in the charade, and be made a fool of.
What’s the fucking difference?
Until election laws are changed I will no longer participate in the charade, and be made a fool of.
Something to ponder:
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and Card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed.
An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"message.
Our Social Security
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary
2) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65% On the first $90,000.
3) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible
4) That the money the participants put in went to the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the General Operating Fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent.
5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month --and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away -- you may be interested in the following:
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically controlled House and Senate.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
(AND MY FAVORITE):
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve.
But it's worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to? Actions speak louder than bumper stickers
(This was a copy/paste, and some may refute a point or two)
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and Card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed.
An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"message.
Our Social Security
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary
2) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65% On the first $90,000.
3) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible
4) That the money the participants put in went to the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the General Operating Fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent.
5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month --and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away -- you may be interested in the following:
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically controlled House and Senate.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
(AND MY FAVORITE):
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve.
But it's worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to? Actions speak louder than bumper stickers
(This was a copy/paste, and some may refute a point or two)
I gave up on Republicans when they were elected in a red tide specifically to repeal Obamacare. They ran on this premise and could have done so much with their majorities. They owned capitol hill moreso than any time since the late 1920's. Remember what they did....? Absofuckinlootly nothing. Screw national politics. It's all bullshit and all rigged. The 2 parties are simply different wings of the same bird. Once you realize and come to terms with that it all begins to make sense. I feel better about pissing into the wind to put out a forest fire than my vote countng anything for the direction of this country. On the contrary my vote does make things happen locally. Local politics for my school board etc. and my sheriff are all I give a damn about anymore. The national scene will never be a fair election until it is vote in person, ID to vote, tally made same day and term limits to eliminate career scum politicians. Until then the puppetmasters contol the illusion to the sheep of a fair vote and the topics that drive the vote.
Last edited:
When a person is a "Career Politician" they can wear either hat without shame.........
www.foxnews.com
West Virginia state senator leaves Democratic Party for the GOP
Glenn Jeffries, a state senator representing West Virginia's 8th District, officially filed to leave the Democratic Party and join the Republican Party.
www.foxnews.com 
