• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

PortaJohn


J6 prisoners treated worse than murderers that are in prison (obvious much much worse than the ones let out).
 
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Joe Biden Renews Call for Assault Weapons Ban (VIDEO)

Joe Biden Wednesday evening delivered remarks at the 10th annual National Vigil for All Victims of Gun Violence at a church in DC. Biden renewed his call for the federal government to ban so-called ‘assault weapons.’ Biden said it is “commonsense” to ban assault weapons and ban high-capacity...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Lame duck is on, will certain corrupt RINO Senators betray the Constitution again?
Make this the second man I ever called a Cunt 😡
But it’s o.k. to GIVE our enemies Billions of $$ worth of OUR weapons.
At least Mr Griner has a man’s Adams Apple .
 
I read both. If it were real wouldn't it have been bigger news? I did not hear about any rooftop ANTIFAs sniping or any ANTIFA having full auto and shooting up anybody. I know lots of stuff is suppressed and/or not reported on, but this one just sounds like a story.
You are forgetting the entire law enforcement apparatus of the USA (FB-DNC-I) is solely focused on gun owners and conservatives, and they are literally denying that ANTIFA even exists at all. Once they riot and burn American cities again they will again declare that it isn't happening, it's Russian disinformation, fake, and declare that it is actually the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who did it.
 
I have been on scene, then seen a news story about what was going on that did not line up with what actually happened. Even local news can't be trusted. The only thing they come close to getting correct is the weather and sports scores.
..., and the weather only occasionally (unless it's San Diego).
 
You are forgetting the entire law enforcement apparatus of the USA (FB-DNC-I) is solely focused on gun owners and conservatives, and they are literally denying that ANTIFA even exists at all. Once they riot and burn American cities again they will again declare that it isn't happening, it's Russian disinformation, fake, and declare that it is actually the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who did it.
The leftist media and our own government just make up whatever stories they want to tell - regardless of actual facts. It's really too bad that the low information voters and soccer moms don't know the difference.
 
In the mean time this gentleman will probably rot behind bars.

Yeah, this completely shows this administrations priorities. They trade an international arms dealer for a god damn black shemale basketball chucker that hate the US. They should all be dancing in the wind.
 
I think this is perfect. This means that Christians shouldn't have to accommodate those who would tear down our faith either.

Personally I think a private business should have the right to "serve" who it wishes. Don't want to make a cake for a gay wedding fine, don't want to serve a Christian group fine.

Lets let the market decide and the chips fall where they may.

I don't remember the outcome of that law suit against the Bakery that refused to do the gay wedding......hold tight.



So with those two rulings, the first two that came up in a google search seems to side with serve who you wish. I can live with that, lets see how this business does in the long term, in the past they have not done real well in excluding people that have "core values". The place that charged white men more then everyone else went out of business a while ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flintdog2011
The orginal article is behind a paywall:

But suffice to say it contains extremely shoddy logic on many levels and points. This is a pretty good exposition of how it fails the most basic scrutiny. There must have been exactly zero people at the Washington Post who are capable of offering any sort of critique or editorial advice in the negative on this article. I am amazed that this passes for intelectual discourse on the left. They really have nothing...

This is a pretty good takedown, but I would not have deadpanned it.
 

You do need to have discussions with them about "no go" zones. And if anyone touches you there, or wants to see anything there you let me, your mom, your grand ma, grandpa, aunt and uncle all know about what happened.

I got my son in the 1st grade, and "growing up on the streets" tends to make a kid much more wise then his years. I don't think I could have been as strong as my boy, but I have a feeling he would have said the same thing about me and my mother. And incase I have not said it before to be a mother all you need to do is open your legs twice. To be a mom you don't have to do that at all. Same with father and dad, father one squirt and done, dad lifetime commentiment.
 
Yeah, this completely shows this administrations priorities. They trade an international arms dealer for a god damn black shemale basketball chucker that hate the US. They should all be dancing in the wind.

I can't wait for Peter Doocy to ask the carpet munching bimbo with the bad hair about this one at the next press conference.

You haven't heard BS yet till you hear what's going to come out of her mouth then.

If only some reporters would have the guts to ask Poopy Pants about this directly. On the other hand, he will mumble something about not being allowed to answer that question then try to figure out which direction to turn to to go off stage.
 
I can't wait for Peter Doocy to ask the carpet munching bimbo with the bad hair about this one at the next press conference.

You haven't heard BS yet till you hear what's going to come out of her mouth then.

If only some reporters would have the guts to ask Poopy Pants about this directly. On the other hand, he will mumble something about not being allowed to answer that question then try to figure out which direction to turn to to go off stage.

it should go tactfully like this :

"Why didnt the Biden administration insist on the release of Paul Whelan along with Britney Griner in the recent prisoner exchange? Would he have been included if he was gay?"
 
For decades the most controversial "coming of age book" for young female teens who started getting their periods was Judy Blume's "Are you there God? Its me Margaret". Even broaching the issues of a changing body sometimes lead to book banning in libraries in Bible Belt states. Why was it banned? It discussed the angst over not getting your period yet when your friends where (all female), the need for a training bra, and coping with the desire to kiss a boy. It was still banned as late as 2015. Interesting to see the other list of banned books below.)

BANNED BOOKS AWARENESS

Banned Books Awareness: “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret”

November 3, 2013 R. Wolf Baldassarro Social Change 7
margaret-blume.jpg


Recently, the members (of Mensa) consulted on a list of banned books created by Uprise Books Project founder Justin Stanley and were asked to rank the top 10 in order of importance. The list may or may not surprise you and many of the titles have been previously covered in this column. See if you can recognize a few:
1. 1984
2. To Kill a Mockingbird
3. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
4. On the Origin of Species
5. Catcher in the Rye
6. Of Mice and Men
7. The Lord of the Flies
8. The Lord of the Rings
9. Slaughterhouse-Five
Comments about the top winner included references about the author himself. “Orwell’s insight into the malleability of human thought and behavior is a timeless incentive to personal awareness of the consequences of action and inaction,” said one member. Another pointed to its influence on society, saying, “1984 is one of those books that has become a cultural cornerstone.”
Okay, but where is number 10 on this list? That, dear readers, is the subject of this week’s column. It’s none other than the queen of banned books herself, Judy Blume, and her immortal tale of budding womanhood, “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret”.
Written in 1970, the young adult novel followed Margaret as she tackled many common pre-teen female issues including buying her first bra, having her first period, coping with belted sanitary napkins (changed to adhesive pads in recent editions), jealousy towards another girl who developed a mature figure earlier than other girls, liking boys, and whether to voice her opinion if it differs from those of her friends.
Those sure are some complex issues, but perhaps the most noted is that Margaret’s mother is Christian and her father is Jewish and, at its core, the novel explores her quest for a single religion in her life, which adds alienation to an already tense list of subject matters.
All of this lead to it being one of the most banned and challenged books of the last 30 years. In fact, second only to Stephen King, Judy Blume is the most banned author in American history, with several of her books appearing on banned book lists nationwide.
During an interview with NPR, Blume said, “When I started to write, it was the ‘70s, and throughout that decade, we didn’t have any problems with book challenges or censorship. It all started really in a big way in 1980… It came with the election, the presidential election of 1980, and the next day, I’ve been told, the censors were crawling out of the woodwork and challenging, like, ‘It’s our turn now, and we’re going to say what we don’t want our children to read.’
The number of public libraries and schools where this book has been challenged is astounding, but it was outright removed from the elementary school libraries in Gilbert, Arizona in 1980 and ordered that parental consent be required for students to check it out from the junior high school.
It was challenged in the Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Fund du Lac, Wisconsin school systems in 1982 because the book is “sexually offensive and amoral.”
Also in 1982, it was restricted in Zimmerman, Minnesota to students who had written permission from their parents. After the Minnesota Civil Liberties Union sued the Elk River, Minnesota school board (1983), the Board reversed its decision.
It was then challenged at the Xenia, Ohio school libraries in 1983 because the book’s “two themes of sex and anti-Christian behavior” were deemed inappropriate.
A similar charge of being “profane, immoral, and offensive” led to it being challenged, but later retained, in the Bozeman, Montana school libraries in 1985.
Perhaps most daunting is that Blume paints a bleak and dark vision of the path that we’re on as a society, “[censorship] hasn’t gone away. It’s growing in different directions… It’s contagious, the desire to control everything in your children’s lives, including what they read.”
The reasons behind these challenges may seem innocent and well intentioned, but the truth is that at the center of the issue it isn’t these topics themselves that worry parents, it’s that we don’t want to acknowledge them for very one very selfish reason: they make us uncomfortable. We simply don’t want to talk about it- especially with our children. Therefore, we hide in a bubble and force our children to search for the answers on their own and get then angry when they find them.
“But if they read about it, they’ll know more than we do and start to question the world around them.” That’s the rationale. So, logically, it means that the books must be destroyed lest the truth get out that their world is changing- socially and physiologically.
American Mensa was quite correct in placing Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret at number 10; just as 1984 was the perfect choice for number 1. In fact, one could easily equate the futuristic Proles of Orwell’s classic with the children of today, who find themselves caught up in a war for intellectual freedom with the previous generations, because hope for the future lies with them. Only there, amid the dreams and inquisitive minds of our youth does the power exist to destroy ignorance and fear. However, until they become aware they will never rebel, and only after they have rebelled can they ever live their own life and walk a path of wisdom.
For more information on the Banned Books Awareness and Reading for Knowledge project and the complete list of titles covered, please visit the official website at http://bbark.deepforestproductions.com/
Sources: Wikipedia, Media Bistro, deletecensorship.org, NPR
© 2013 R. Wolf Baldassarro/Deep Forest Productions



End of Article


Now, this is what they are promoting:

 
Last edited:

Viktor Bout stole $32 billion from Ukraine.
 
Here's the actual article that Silver Doctors rips off.

Are all the rifles 6.5s? ;) j/k j/k
 
I hope he has that registered as an SBR, it looks collapsible (7 seconds into the video)
1CEB8202-8C98-4E89-AC27-70C4ECE93702.jpeg
 

So if one of their "security guards" uses lethal force against a thief that refuses to comply will the store owner or the security agency pay for their legal bills? Will they get a "pass" like some real cops get when their is a shooting that isn't justified? Even if the shooting is justified, there will be hell to pay.

He may be an off duty cop... 🤷‍♂️

If he's an off duty cop then he ought to be in the department's uniform. I realize that may not be necessary but most of the cops that I've worked with and know have to wear their uniform when they are on a special duty like that.

In addition why would any cop, in his right mind, want to do part time work like that when it's so visible. I cannot help but think of the legal risks involved if they have to "smoke that hog" during part time employment.

It's bad enough if they have to shoot someone while on duty (if they are white). Which brings up another question; are the stores and the security agency discriminating against white security guards? All I've seen, so far, are black security guards.
 
So if one of their "security guards" uses lethal force against a thief that refuses to comply will the store owner or the security agency pay for their legal bills? Will they get a "pass" like some real cops get when their is a shooting that isn't justified? Even if the shooting is justified, there will be hell to pay.



If he's an off duty cop then he ought to be in the department's uniform. I realize that may not be necessary but most of the cops that I've worked with and know have to wear their uniform when they are on a special duty like that.

In addition why would any cop, in his right mind, want to do part time work like that when it's so visible. I cannot help but think of the legal risks involved if they have to "smoke that hog" during part time employment.

It's bad enough if they have to shoot someone while on duty (if they are white). Which brings up another question; are the stores and the security agency discriminating against white security guards? All I've seen, so far, are black security guards.

Depends on the gig. Sometimes they want a guy that will just blend in. Other times the uniform is enough to stop the stupid.
 
He may be an off duty cop... 🤷‍♂️

That really makes no difference.

Here no matter the "gig" all "off duty" activity is done through the agency. Your Lt will sign off on it then you are good to go. You represent the agency at all times, on or off duty. Do do something stupid off duty even if just "slightly stupid" that would get your hand slapped elsewhere in the world will get you shown the door here. I have been here for close to 20 years, been around a few different agencies, and been to some "events" where we see new toys. I have not seen office issued equipment like that around here.
 
Let's See..
1) Fk Mitch, fuk'd everyone of those candiates over by pulling funding, because he didn't want them to win.
2) Mitch helped in the Ranked Choice in Alaska, which kept Palin and Tshibaka from winning. Mitch didn't want Tshibaka. Dem's pushed through a ranked choice, vs the REAL, winner take all
3) You didn't mention the part about FTX helping Dem candidates make $$
AZ - Mark Kelly, a Democrat raised nearly $75.5 million; GOP challenger and Trump pick Blake Masters hauled in only $9.9 million.​
GA - Warnock had outspent Republican Herschel Walker $126 million to $48.5 million.​
FYI - Kelly had ads running a year before the election. 24/7, that's not taking into account the AZ shenanigans that were going on.​
the amount of $$ that the Dems are raising, and spending is truly criminal (ask sam)
1670530267017.jpeg
 
I read both. If it were real wouldn't it have been bigger news? I did not hear about any rooftop ANTIFAs sniping or any ANTIFA having full auto and shooting up anybody. I know lots of stuff is suppressed and/or not reported on, but this one just sounds like a story.
Ding ding ding... we have a winner.

I think it's completely bullshit.