AZ senator Kyrsten Sinema leaving democratic party

Maybe some others will follow. She was a presumed "star" of the Marxist party. Maybe she didn't like being a Marxist; because she understood the fillibuster shouldn't be dissolved and has stood up against most budget stupity IIRC. Now, if we could change her mind on 2A we'd be good for now.

She's also not stupid; she knows going to go up to be reelected (not a 1 termer) and figures this will give her leverage to get votes from the center. Which, in reality, is an excellent plan IF and ONLY IF, she can serve both sides of the aisle. Lieberman tried this and didn't fare so well.
 
Last edited:
Literally everything happening from the uniparty is designed around bringing in the great reset. Don't fucking fall for it. This broad, Manchin, the Hawaiian broad...it's all show and there will be more. The armored chicken already warned y'all and he's right, this is just softening everyone up for the big uniparty push.

The NWO needs you to stay in the dark and believe that there are 2 parties fighting each other for power. There is one political party, and one giant population of slaves that don't know they are slaves yet. If said slaves wake up and realize their fate too soon...then it all crashes so they need you to keep believing this shit. The great reset happens when the technology is in place for go time. That time is just around the corner. Sweden launched the implanted vax status, Castro Jr up north is launching the new vax passport and banning all guns now, these are places where it's beginning. The tech is almost ready.

So go on ahead and debate about how this will slow down the "democrats" power in the senate and how she's seeing the light and maybe there's hope after all. :ROFLMAO:

We are not voting our way out of this.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: mtrmn and jmp1
“Nothing will change about my values or my behavior,” she told the outlet, adding that she won’t caucus with Republicans.

She just wants to be "special" and get a better "deal" when it's a close vote in the Senate.

For all intents and purposes, all the "independents" generally are actually democrats.
 
“Nothing will change about my values or my behavior,” she told the outlet, adding that she won’t caucus with Republicans.

She just wants to be "special" and get a better "deal" when it's a close vote in the Senate.

For all intents and purposes, all the "independents" generally are actually democrats.

She's just like a prostitute that walks both sides of the street.
 
“Nothing will change about my values or my behavior,” she told the outlet, adding that she won’t caucus with Republicans.

She just wants to be "special" and get a better "deal" when it's a close vote in the Senate.

For all intents and purposes, all the "independents" generally are actually democrats.
FIFU: "For all intents and purposes, all the "independents" generally are actually marxists."
"And 85% of "republicans" are actually democrats"
 
How does this affect which party holds the majority (committee appointments, et al.)?
It depends. I don't know the overall spread in the Senate. Let's say it was 51-49 and she jumped ship. If she decided to caucus with the minority party it would make it 50-50 for those things that you mentioned.

If it was 52-48 and she decided to caucus with the minority party it won't make a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: babyguppy
Literally everything happening from the uniparty is designed around bringing in the great reset. Don't fucking fall for it. This broad, Manchin, the Hawaiian broad...it's all show and there will be more. The armored chicken already warned y'all and he's right, this is just softening everyone up for the big uniparty push.

The NWO needs you to stay in the dark and believe that there are 2 parties fighting each other for power. There is one political party, and one giant population of slaves that don't know they are slaves yet. If said slaves wake up and realize their fate too soon...then it all crashes so they need you to keep believing this shit. The great reset happens when the technology is in place for go time. That time is just around the corner. Sweden launched the implanted vax status, Castro Jr up north is launching the new vax passport and banning all guns now, these are places where it's beginning. The tech is almost ready.

So go on ahead and debate about how this will slow down the "democrats" power in the senate and how she's seeing the light and maybe there's hope after all. :ROFLMAO:

We are not voting our way out of this.
I'm gone be the Great Reset's Johnny Appleseed of solvent traps and 80% AR/Glock lowers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atomic41 and 232593
We need more to leave both parties. It’s time to abandon the two party system.

Be very careful what you wish for.
The "multi party" parliamentary system like north of us and in much of Europe and other places is actually way worse when it comes to folks you didn't want and didn't elect managing to figure out how to take power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BytorJr
Yes, but aren't they all.......... :unsure: :rolleyes:
1670619379277.gif
 
Be very careful what you wish for.
The "multi party" parliamentary system like north of us and in much of Europe and other places is actually way worse when it comes to folks you didn't want and didn't elect managing to figure out how to take power.
The only party I want is one that follows the constitution. The literal purpose of any party is to undermine the rule of law and form the country and governments into what ever myopic view your bullshit party has. They are all treasonous scum.
 
The founding fathers never envisioned a two party system. If memory serves me correctly, some of my past reading seemed to indicate that some of them were against a two party system.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

While the 2 party system may not be 'perfect', is is BY FAR the lessor of two evils. It is MUCH better than the multi-party system that Canada has. Look at us, we have a minority government. Which means that the 'majority vote' was split amongst many others diluting the ballot, and a minority party won. So now we have a costume-prancing, black-face wearing, COMMUNIST dilettante absolutely RUINING this country.

You're saying that you like this idea? You are saying that 'this is what you want'? You're saying that you promote this?

Because that is EXACTLY what you are doing. See for yourself. Look for yourself.

(this is not directed at specifically the quoted poster,,, this is directed at ALL YA'LL who think along this line)
 
  • Like
Reactions: W54/XM-388
The founding fathers never envisioned a two party system. If memory serves me correctly, some of my past reading seemed to indicate that some of them were against a two party system.
That's most likely true, but back then they were honest and pure in their intentions.

Now we have trillions of dollars at stake and mega conglomerates floating around giving million dollar jobs to the kids of Senators or whatnot.

If we voluntarily divide it would be like taking half of our players off the field all in the name of "principle". The other side will just laugh at how stupid it was and then take advantage of it in every possible way.
 
That's most likely true, but back then they were honest and pure in their intentions.

Now we have trillions of dollars at stake and mega conglomerates floating around giving million dollar jobs to the kids of Senators or whatnot.

If we voluntarily divide it would be like taking half of our players off the field all in the name of "principle". The other side will just laugh at how stupid it was and then take advantage of it in every possible way.
You also have to remember that senators, when the constitution was written, were not elected by popular vote. They were appointed by the states as they are the representatives of the state in the federal government. We need to fix that first. Having the people elect senators was a huge mistake, but a calculated move on the part of the globalists.

If the states still appointed the senators, there would likely be a super majority of red senators as the vast majority of this country, it’s governors and counties are very much red.
 
You also have to remember that senators, when the constitution was written, were not elected by popular vote. They were appointed by the states as they are the representatives of the state in the federal government. We need to fix that first. Having the people elect senators was a huge mistake, but a calculated move on the part of the globalists.

If the states still appointed the senators, there would likely be a super majority of red senators as the vast majority of this country, it’s governors and counties are very much red.
I'm 100% all for letting the state appoint Senators, just like it used to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mvphilly
Thats what feed sacks and baling twine are for. :whistle:
I have no earthy idea how many tons of feed bags I loaded/threw/emptied with "cubes" for cattle, or pellets for pigs....fuckage, thanks for bringing that childhood nightmare back to the surface...asshole.

Edit add, because I'm drinking...twine wasn't an issue most of the time, we did big round bales...idiot cubes not so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maggot