• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

The NRAs explanation of why the 6.5Creedmoor is better than .260............

Im2bent

Old Salt
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Jun 30, 2020
    4,239
    7,069
    "High BC bullets might be important for long-range shooting, but they’re not the only thing that matters. Velocity—just as it always has been and always will be—is important, too. For example, 6.5 Creedmoor is generally touted as being a better long-range cartridge than the .260 Rem., even though the .260 Rem. has more powder capacity and can push bullets faster. The reason for this is that factory rifles for the Creedmoor are built with a 1:8-inch twist as opposed to the 1:9-inch rifling twist of the .260. Because of this, factory Creedmoor ammo can be loaded with higher BC bullets."

    And the entire article..... https://www.shootingillustrated.com...l&utm_campaign=020223email&utm_id=020223email
     
    1675714792950.png
     
    Great click-bait using just that quote and not the whole discussion. For those wondering, the OPs title is just that, click bait to get people arguing.

    Here’s the rest of that brief discussion:

    “But, let’s make a comparison. Using Hornady’s advertised data, let’s compare a 147-grain ELD Match bullet from a Creedmoor with a 130-grain ELD Match bullet from a .260 Rem. The 147-grain bullet has a G1 BC of .697 and the 130-grain bullet’s G1 BC is .554. The Creedmoor’s bullet has a 26-percent BC advantage. But, in factory ammo the 130-grain .260 bullet has a 6-percent velocity advantage.

    According to Hornady’s 4DOF calculator, at 1,000 yards the 130-grain bullet from the .260 Rem. will need 29.78 MOA of elevation correction to hit point-of-aim, and the bullet from the
    6.5 Creedmoor will need 29.93 MOA. The lighter, faster, lower BC bullet, has a slight edge. Why? Time of flight. You see, since gravity is a constant, and since all bullets fall to Earth at the same rate, the difference is how far they can travel in the same amount of time.

    The 130-grain bullet from the .260 will get to 800 yards .003 second before the 147-grain bullet from the 6.5 Creedmoor. So, to that distance, the faster moving 130-grain bullet has less drop. In fact, because of its early speed and flatter trajectory advantage, it still has less drop out to 1,000 yards, even though it gets there almost .02 second after the higher BC bullet. Beyond 1,000 yards, the higher BC bullet shoots flatter and faster, because its higher BC has helped it retain velocity better. The higher BC bullet will also show less wind drift.

    I still don’t know what qualifies as “high BC” or “long range,” but I do know this: From a trajectory standpoint, it takes a tremendous increase in BC to make up for just a small increase in velocity. High BC bullets are great for distance shooting if you don’t have to sacrifice too much velocity to shoot them.”


    Then of course, there’s the question of twist rate. Who even buys a .260 with 1:9 twist rate anyway?

    Nowhere in the article does the NRA say one is better than the other.
     
    Great click-bait using just that quote and not the whole discussion. For those wondering, the OPs title is just that, click bait to get people arguing.

    Here’s the rest of that brief discussion:

    “But, let’s make a comparison. Using Hornady’s advertised data, let’s compare a 147-grain ELD Match bullet from a Creedmoor with a 130-grain ELD Match bullet from a .260 Rem. The 147-grain bullet has a G1 BC of .697 and the 130-grain bullet’s G1 BC is .554. The Creedmoor’s bullet has a 26-percent BC advantage. But, in factory ammo the 130-grain .260 bullet has a 6-percent velocity advantage.

    According to Hornady’s 4DOF calculator, at 1,000 yards the 130-grain bullet from the .260 Rem. will need 29.78 MOA of elevation correction to hit point-of-aim, and the bullet from the
    6.5 Creedmoor will need 29.93 MOA. The lighter, faster, lower BC bullet, has a slight edge. Why? Time of flight. You see, since gravity is a constant, and since all bullets fall to Earth at the same rate, the difference is how far they can travel in the same amount of time.

    The 130-grain bullet from the .260 will get to 800 yards .003 second before the 147-grain bullet from the 6.5 Creedmoor. So, to that distance, the faster moving 130-grain bullet has less drop. In fact, because of its early speed and flatter trajectory advantage, it still has less drop out to 1,000 yards, even though it gets there almost .02 second after the higher BC bullet. Beyond 1,000 yards, the higher BC bullet shoots flatter and faster, because its higher BC has helped it retain velocity better. The higher BC bullet will also show less wind drift.

    I still don’t know what qualifies as “high BC” or “long range,” but I do know this: From a trajectory standpoint, it takes a tremendous increase in BC to make up for just a small increase in velocity. High BC bullets are great for distance shooting if you don’t have to sacrifice too much velocity to shoot them.”


    Then of course, there’s the question of twist rate. Who even buys a .260 with 1:9 twist rate anyway?

    Nowhere in the article does the NRA say one is better than the other.
    So you agree with this statement directly from the article? "The reason for this is that factory rifles for the Creedmoor are built with a 1:8-inch twist as opposed to the 1:9-inch rifling twist of the .260. Because of this, factory Creedmoor ammo can be loaded with higher BC bullets"
     
    So you agree with this statement directly from the article? "The reason for this is that factory rifles for the Creedmoor are built with a 1:8-inch twist as opposed to the 1:9-inch rifling twist of the .260. Because of this, factory Creedmoor ammo can be loaded with higher BC bullets"
    Where did I say that?
    I did note that changing the twist rate variable makes their statement less ridiculous. But I also asked who has a 1:9 twist rate .260.

    Besides:

    1675715662967.jpeg
     
    still don't care I want a gun for every caliber and two for the ones I enjoy shooting .
     
    • Like
    Reactions: JoeZ
    I just got 3 calls from them for responding,
    They said, thanks for showing interest in our articles would you like to sign up for an additional 10 years ?
    What you're not a life member?
     
    All I saw was some blather about factory ammo. So, irrelevant
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lash
    Zackly. That and factory rifles and twist rates.
    Yeah, those too

    I mean, it only makes sense that a round introduced in the 90’s and totally abandoned by Rem would fall short to a round introduced 15(-ish?) later and pimped pretty hard by Hornady

    I sort of stopped having conversations with one of my buddies about this vs that. He would bring up the comparisons and it would almost always be something using factory ammo and I’d start explaining they were useless if you reload, which he knew I did & he started not long after
     
    Hahaha! I love it! Also don’t really care, though if you think responding to trolling with more trolling is lathered up, I got some news for you.
     
    You guys aren't doing it right. It's 6.5x47...

    ...Because 6.5 PRC velocities with .277 SIG Fury pressures and 7mm RM barrel life is where the chest hairs really start to curl.

    Plus it has "La-poo-ah" right in the name.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: iceng
    You know, I seem to remember the same reasoning bandied about as to why the 243win is less popular than 6mmCM for PRS. They tend to be set up from from the factory for light weight bullets favored by hunters (slow twist barrels) over the heavy for caliber bullets favored by the PRS crowd.

    Could one order a custom barrel with a fast twist chambered in 243win? Yes. Is a fudd from the NRA or some legacy gun rag going to do that? No.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lash
    You know, I seem to remember the same reasoning bandied about as to why the 243win is less popular than 6mmCM for PRS. They tend to be set up from from the factory for light weight bullets favored by hunters (slow twist barrels) over the heavy for caliber bullets favored by the PRS crowd.

    Could one order a custom barrel with a fast twist chambered in 243win? Yes. Is a fudd from the NRA or some legacy gun rag going to do that? No.
    On Franks podcast back in the day one of the guests was doing just that IIRC. One of the Mile High Guys if memory serves
     
    So they compare two different guns and two different twist rates and two different bullet weights? Anymore variables they wanna throw in? How about different powders and different primers to be sure we get compounded variables, ohhh let’s not forget different barrel length too!

    I can’t face palm hard enough.
     
    Well y’all can rag on the 6.5 Creedmoor all you like, but that gay 260 Remington is just a poor step child to the true 6.5’s

    The Magnificent 6.5x300 Weatherby Wright Magnum, What more can be said.

    6.5 Remington magnum; another Remington piss-poor managed intro, one of two original short bodied cartridges,

    6.5 TCU; A little known and unappreciated, hard hitting, light recoiling ram slammer

    6.5x55 Swede; the grand dad of all 6.5’s, perhaps the best 6.5 round ever.

    So there Creedmoor haters.
     
    Fun fact:

    Most 6.5 CM shooters can dehydrate a cheddarwurst without ever taking a bite 🫠
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: lash
    It's funny how many times they have tried to reinvent the 6.5×52mm Carcano. 130 years old and designed for long bullets. You'd think now that we know JFK was smoked by a 221 fireball from an xp100, it would be time for a resurgence of the 6.5 Italian round.
     
    Last edited:
    It's funny how many times they have tried to reinvent the 6.5×52mm Carcano. 130 years old and designed for long bullets. You'd think now that we know JFK was smoked by a 221 fireball from an xp100, it would be time for a resurgence of the 6.5 Italian round.

    we do know that? when and where?

    what a feather in the hat of the fireball, huh?
     
    Could one order a custom barrel with a fast twist chambered in 243win? Yes. Is a fudd from the NRA or some legacy gun rag going to do that? No.

    Back before this PRS thing, back before the cheapskate lazies ruined innovation with stupid speed limits, back before Creedmore was a must have name at the end of every type of caliber, back before 30 pound rifles shooting light cartridges, folks in competitions were running custom chambered .243 rifles, shooting 105gr or similar rounds, loaded hot at over 3k fps to sometimes a fair bit over 3k fps and doing very well with them.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lash
    Back before this PRS thing, back before the cheapskate lazies ruined innovation with stupid speed limits, back before Creedmore was a must have name at the end of every type of caliber, back before 30 pound rifles shooting light cartridges, folks in competitions were running custom chambered .243 rifles, shooting 105gr or similar rounds, loaded hot at over 3k fps to sometimes a fair bit over 3k fps and doing very well with them.
    We’re on the same page. But, the NRA and the Fudd writers are geared towards the “shooters” limited to what they can find at Cabelas. Like 1-12 twist 243s…
     
    we do know that? when and where?

    what a feather in the hat of the fireball, huh?
    Sure I suppose we don't "know" that. Merely suggesting I find it unreasonable to have shunned the round as a whole based on "its use" in the assassination.