• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

6.5PRC or 6.8 Western?

TheDude219

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 4, 2022
181
140
NC
I do not reload. Looking for up to 1000 yards. Mostly sub 800 and paper/steel. Will take out west to hunt, but not frequently.

I’ve seen the concerns of 6.8 sticking around.

Thoughts?

Or do I just stick with a 6.5 CM?
 
Probably elk. I’m more of a bird guy when it comes to hunting, be he’s working on a trip or two out west so I figured I’d tag along.
 
Easy choice, PRC. I have nothing against the 6.8, but it will always be diminished because of its niche nature.
^^^ This right here. Only Browning and Winchester rifles are available currently and same with ammunition. It is what the 270 WSM should have been but it seems like it is going to remain pretty obscure. If you were a reloader than it wouldn't matter but you're going to be limited with options. The 6.5 PRC has exploded and is very prolific.
 
Probably elk. I’m more of a bird guy when it comes to hunting, be he’s working on a trip or two out west so I figured I’d tag along.
Oh ok do you have a factory action? And I would probably go with a prc I had one and liked it a lot just couldn’t find ammo and I was impatient so I sold it lol….6.8 western is cool but even browning and Winchester aren’t supporting it… they are talking about a faster twist 270 so that should tell you something
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude219
Oh ok do you have a factory action? And I would probably go with a prc I had one and liked it a lot just couldn’t find ammo and I was impatient so I sold it lol….6.8 western is cool but even browning and Winchester aren’t supporting it… they are talking about a faster twist 270 so that should tell you something
Was looking at Alamo rifles with defiance. Open to other ideas.
 
Was looking at Alamo rifles with defiance. Open to other ideas.
oh ok I didn’t know what your creed was.. if it was custom you could just get a new barrel and bolt and be good to go… as far as actions go there all good just find one that has what you want and buy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude219
Alamo builds great rifles.

Take a look at & compare the Lone Peak Fuzion, Impact 737, and Zeus Terminus.
Thanks. I was going to buy a ready to ship one, so I didn't have any action options. That being said, I don't have any real history with bolt guns so I figured I would be more that happy with the Defiance.... although I don't particularly care for the new owner there.
 
I would look at the one’s recommended I just ordered a zues and also bighorn is good too tl3
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude219
Per the question of the OP, if the choices are only 6.8 Western and 6.5 CM, I would edge toward the 6.5 CM. Mainly because even though the 6.8 Western packs a good wallop, the ammo makers are not supporting it all that much. So, unless you build up a supply of parts and like doing all of your handloading, consider staying with the 6.5 CM. And it can take a moose, at least under 200 yards.

Rob Arrington at deermeatfordinner hunted a moose on the Cree Nation in Canada and was shooting his Howa 1500 in 6.5 Creedmoor with a Hornady 143 grain ELD-X. Granted, this was more like 200 - 300 yards and not a thousand but he did drop a moose in one shot. Go to timestamp 03:45 to get to the action.



That being said, I have long been a .308 guy but I recently got and really appreciate the performance of the 7 PRC. Sure it is a magnum round but honestly, to me, it felt like a .308 180 gr with a slim recoil pad. So, I put on a thicker recoil pad, no sting (on my chassis with the non-forgiving factory butt pad.)

7 PRC will get whitetail up to moose. At 1,000 yards, it is still over 1,200 ft-lbs of energy and my personal limit is 1,000 ft-lbs.

You might try 6.5 PRC for less drop than the 6.5 CM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude219
Killed elk with 65 Saum and 65x284, lots of deer antelope with prc. Shot placement is key. Berger 65prc 156 ammo will do anything to an elk Hornady 7prc ammo will.
 
Go 6.5 PRC because of availability and popularity. I personally don’t see the 6.8 western making it but I could be wrong.
I was watching a podcast about that very thing. Whether it is advisable or not to continue investing in 6.8 Western. In this case, 6.5 CM would be the way to for sheer tonnage of ammo and parts availability.

And, again, if going long range, get a 7 PRC. Kicks like a .308 W but behaves like a lighter .300 WM for accuracy and flat trajectory.

Although 6.5 PRC is fairly common, as well.
 
And, again, if going long range, get a 7 PRC. Kicks like a .308 W but behaves like a lighter .300 WM for accuracy and flat trajectory.
No offense, but this comment sounds like a Hornady add. The 7prc holds 30gr more powder than a 308 and is pushing equal weight bullets in a smaller bore at higher velocity. Equals MORE recoil. The ballistics of a 65, 7 and 300 are all damn near the same elevation and drift. This was their purpose. A 7rem mag and a 7prc are ballistic twins, are you saying it behaves like a 308 too? Truthfully all the prc cases out run a 300wm ballistically, it's old, belted and FACTORY ammo is watered down low bc junk in most cases.
The difference is energy. The 7 is the middle ground. However certain bullets in a the 65 will do the same as 180 eldm of the 7prc. Original poster wanted factory ammo. I've witness and been shooter on let's of 156 Berger kills as well as 147 eldms. They get the job done, and we'll. I wouldn't put and eldm on a shoulder inside 300y if it was a 65, 7 or 300. Maybe the 65cm as it's slower, preventing over expansion. Bullets have consistent behaviors below 2600 impact velocity, once you get faster than that, denser target will over expand, so shoot for vitals or high shoulder/cns inside 350-300y, once you get out to 400 and further, you can put these bullets on a shoulder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b6graham
No offense, but this comment sounds like a Hornady add. The 7prc holds 30gr more powder than a 308 and is pushing equal weight bullets in a smaller bore at higher velocity. Equals MORE recoil. The ballistics of a 65, 7 and 300 are all damn near the same elevation and drift. This was their purpose. A 7rem mag and a 7prc are ballistic twins, are you saying it behaves like a 308 too? Truthfully all the prc cases out run a 300wm ballistically, it's old, belted and FACTORY ammo is watered down low bc junk in most cases.
The difference is energy. The 7 is the middle ground. However certain bullets in a the 65 will do the same as 180 eldm of the 7prc. Original poster wanted factory ammo. I've witness and been shooter on let's of 156 Berger kills as well as 147 eldms. They get the job done, and we'll. I wouldn't put and eldm on a shoulder inside 300y if it was a 65, 7 or 300. Maybe the 65cm as it's slower, preventing over expansion. Bullets have consistent behaviors below 2600 impact velocity, once you get faster than that, denser target will over expand, so shoot for vitals or high shoulder/cns inside 350-300y, once you get out to 400 and further, you can put these bullets on a shoulder.
I belevie that 6.5 PRC is the correct choice between the two. I don't have a source but seem to remember hearing that Hornady has refused to support 6.8 Western. I suspect that it is too close to the 6.5PRC. Also, you can get good brass for the 6.5 PRC (Lapua, Peterson, ADG, etc.) and you can't for the 6.8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nivium
I went through this dilemma last year and decided on a 24” 6.5 creedmoor. With hand loads and a longer barrel, I can really maximize the performance of the 6.5CM. I can also afford to practice with a 6.5CM and enjoy shooting it more than a 6.5 PRC. The 6.8 western is a nice looking caliber but who knows how it will catch on yet. If you’re set on 6.5 prc or 6.8 western, I would go with the prc. It will kill elk all day long and has a good following. The 7 prc is a nice cartridge but it’s a long action round. It’s not really in the same class as the 6.5 prc. 7mm SAUM is another great cartridge but I wouldn’t recommend it unless you’re a serious reloader and have no problem scouring around for brass.

I ended up killing a 5x5 last rifle season with 1 shot through the vitals with my 6.5 creedmoor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude219
No offense, but this comment sounds like a Hornady add. The 7prc holds 30gr more powder than a 308 and is pushing equal weight bullets in a smaller bore at higher velocity. Equals MORE recoil. The ballistics of a 65, 7 and 300 are all damn near the same elevation and drift. This was their purpose. A 7rem mag and a 7prc are ballistic twins, are you saying it behaves like a 308 too? Truthfully all the prc cases out run a 300wm ballistically, it's old, belted and FACTORY ammo is watered down low bc junk in most cases.
The difference is energy. The 7 is the middle ground. However certain bullets in a the 65 will do the same as 180 eldm of the 7prc. Original poster wanted factory ammo. I've witness and been shooter on let's of 156 Berger kills as well as 147 eldms. They get the job done, and we'll. I wouldn't put and eldm on a shoulder inside 300y if it was a 65, 7 or 300. Maybe the 65cm as it's slower, preventing over expansion. Bullets have consistent behaviors below 2600 impact velocity, once you get faster than that, denser target will over expand, so shoot for vitals or high shoulder/cns inside 350-300y, once you get out to 400 and further, you can put these bullets on a shoulder.
Awesome info. Thank you
 
I say the 7 PRC feels like a 308. I could be wrong and it is more recoil impulse. I am just built differently.
 
Per the question of the OP, if the choices are only 6.8 Western and 6.5 CM, I would edge toward the 6.5 CM. Mainly because even though the 6.8 Western packs a good wallop, the ammo makers are not supporting it all that much. So, unless you build up a supply of parts and like doing all of your handloading, consider staying with the 6.5 CM. And it can take a moose, at least under 200 yards.

Rob Arrington at deermeatfordinner hunted a moose on the Cree Nation in Canada and was shooting his Howa 1500 in 6.5 Creedmoor with a Hornady 143 grain ELD-X. Granted, this was more like 200 - 300 yards and not a thousand but he did drop a moose in one shot. Go to timestamp 03:45 to get to the action.



That being said, I have long been a .308 guy but I recently got and really appreciate the performance of the 7 PRC. Sure it is a magnum round but honestly, to me, it felt like a .308 180 gr with a slim recoil pad. So, I put on a thicker recoil pad, no sting (on my chassis with the non-forgiving factory butt pad.)

7 PRC will get whitetail up to moose. At 1,000 yards, it is still over 1,200 ft-lbs of energy and my personal limit is 1,000 ft-lbs.

You might try 6.5 PRC for less drop than the 6.5 CM.

Well, you had me convinced to go 7PRC but I can't find ammo anywhere... decisions decisions
 
Well, you had me convinced to go 7PRC but I can't find ammo anywhere... decisions decisions
I have been getting mine on Gunbroker. I have about 80 rounds left from a 100 rd shipment and I just received another 200 rounds at about $3.something per round.

But it is definitely not at the local stores. Cheaper Than Dirt has a page for it but nothing on there.

Also, to clarify, I did not say the 7 PRC recoil impulse was less than a .308 W. Just that, to me, it felt like a .308 180 gr with a not very thick recoil pad. Others crunch the numbers and can show where it has more impulse and it is a magnum round.

And to re-iterate my first reply, given only the options of 6.5 CM and 6.8 Western I would probably lean towards the 6.5 CM just because of availability and parts. Not that it is the best round for everything. Like the video I linked, it brought down a moose at a few hundred yards.

But if starting over and wanting a new round, certainly 7 mm Rem Mag has a lot of availability.

There are other rounds. Ryan Cleckner, formerly sniper team leader in the 1st Ranger Battalion 75th Ranger Regiment shot a .300 Win Mag in service. Most engagements were well less than 800 yards. To about 500 yards ish, he could simply dial elevation for distance and and hold left or right edge of target zone into the wind and get a hit. Granted, his zone was approximately 20 inches by 24 inches.

Currently, retired, he prefers the .300 PRC and thinks the special forces, especially Rangers should adopt that round. That has significant recoil.

But if we do get down to numbers, the heavier the bullet and larger diameter stand a chance of making a wider wound channel. So, yes, as seen, a 6.5 CM will get a moose with a shot in the right place.

And so, not being a Hornady fan boy before, regardless of accusations, the 7 PRC really excited me with the performance specs.

Again, as you pointed out, getting ammo is a bit scarce, now, About as scarce as 6.5 Creedmoor was back when it started.
 
I have read that ADG will be making 7 PRC brass. I am not aware of when but if your serious it might be worth contacting them about it. I certainly like my 7RM brass they make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws
I have read that ADG will be making 7 PRC brass. I am not aware of when but if your serious it might be worth contacting them about it. I certainly like my 7RM brass they make.
And I saw Gunwerks pres's son bring down an elk with a 7 RM at 1376 yards.
 
Last edited:
just cause it can...
Yes, it certainly can. And did. To be fair, though, the son was always practicing on the 1,000 yard range. So, this is not his first long distance shot.
 
doesn't mean it should
Explain. Is this about long range? Then what is your decided limit of range on hunting an animal? Not being sarcastic, combative, just want to know. If it is less than 100 yards, well, that is fine for shooting in Aunt Mame's bean field.
 
Explain. Is this about long range? Then what is your decided limit of range on hunting an animal? Not being sarcastic, combative, just want to know. If it is less than 100 yards, well, that is fine for shooting in Aunt Mame's bean field.
more that gunwerks needs to promote and show their rifles are capable of kills at distances at which most of their clients shouldn't be shooting game. and that's their prerogative. it sells stupid expensive overpriced gunpackages.

how many circumstances actually require a 1k+ shot versus just working and getting closer to the animal. plus and minus. work versus marketing. doesn't equate to an ethical shot to me and many others. even if you're a KO2M level competitor with a 338 or bigger

i'll take a shot at 'long range' but that range isnt 1,000 yards. and i've shot a lot at 1000y with a lot less than a 7RM and been fine
 
Yes, it certainly can. And did. To be fair, though, the son was always practicing on the 1,000 yard range. So, this is not his first long distance shot.
No dog in the fight, but no gun manufacturer is going to advertise 1,000+ yard missed shots or bad hits on game

Guess I should have watched the video first haha
 
Last edited:
One of the reasons I am following the 7 PRC fairly closely is I am a real fan of the 7RM and the PRC seems like more of that goodness but modernized.

The 7mm PRC will be a good choice at some point (lots of loaded ammo choices and brass availability - bullets are already out there to keep it running), but I don't think that time has come ... yet. I would like to see more ammo makers joining the fun and brass reasonably plentiful.

For hunting with a 7mm, there are lots of good options out there with various pros/cons. They aren't going away anytime soon.

For target fun, the 6.5 PRC is probably the right answer.
 
Last edited:
Everything you need to know about 6.5PRC if you want to hunt at long range and actual get more lethality than if you where using a 6.5CM use a tough bullet like a Nosler Partition or Swift A Frame.

When using Hornady Bullets on animals and ballistic gel blocks you see almost no difference in performance between the 6.5CM and 6.5PRC because of the weak construction of the bullets Hornady has decided to load into these cartridges. Sure the BC of Nosler Partitions and Swift A Frames are not that great but they do what you want a round to do when hunting game which is stay together, retain weight, penetrate, expand and dump energy especialy if you hit bone.

If you do that than the 6.5PRC is a beast compared to the 6.5CM if not it is almost impossible to tell you shot it with something moving 200+fps faster than the 6.5Creedmoor. Even the Hornady Interlock is disappointing.

It is not just me saying this either a lot of people have witnessed similar things. Nothing wrong with the 6.5PRC outside of lack of great hunting bullets loaded for it in a plethora of ammunition by many makers. If Hornady makes a 6.5PRC load with solid copper controlled expansion bullets that would be my second choice after Nosler Partitions and Swift A Frames. I am huge fan of Hornadys target bullets and varmint bullets not at all a fan of bullets for larger game especially not what I can find locally in the form of pre-loaded factory ammo.

If I drive 1 hour in any direction from my city trying to find quality hunting ammo in 6.5 Creedmoor or 6.5PRC is almost impossible you can find plenty though with target bullets. Same thing for 6.5Grendel I had to mail order hunting ammo because I could not get small rifle primers at the time and nothing but target ammo locally.

On the other hand 45-70, 300WM, 308Win, 243Win no issue finding ammo loaded with proper hunting bullets from a variety of venders!
except target bullets kill shit dead...quick

If you reload and do not mind a custom throated chamber you can do anything you would do with the 7PRC with a 7RM. If you seat it out and use a heavier bullet and more powder you can grossly exceed the 7PRC. You just can not do that with a factory rifle and factory ammo. People have do it for almost as long as the 7RM has been around. Same thing applies to hot-roding the 300WM.

Nothing wrong with the 7PRC or the 7RM. The 7RM has a lot more life left in it than most give it credit for. It is only limited by peoples desire and skill to hot-rod it.
as long as it's a savage? right?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 4O6shootist
If you reload and do not mind a custom throated chamber you can do anything you would do with the 7PRC with a 7RM. If you seat it out and use a heavier bullet and more powder you can grossly exceed the 7PRC. You just can not do that with a factory rifle and factory ammo. People have do it for almost as long as the 7RM has been around. Same thing applies to hot-roding the 300WM.

Nothing wrong with the 7PRC or the 7RM. The 7RM has a lot more life left in it than most give it credit for. It is only limited by peoples desire and skill to hot-rod it.
A 7prc holds 82gr powder, a 7mag, depending on brass make is 83-86gr. At equal psi, that's another 20-30fps. As I said earlier, they're ballistic twins. Hornady ammo is loaded down, I forsee Peterson brass will allow everyone to throttle it up a bit. No flies on the 7mag, my brother shoots a custom long throat pushing 180 hyb at 3040 with N565.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b6graham
If you reload and do not mind a custom throated chamber you can do anything you would do with the 7PRC with a 7RM. If you seat it out and use a heavier bullet and more powder you can grossly exceed the 7PRC. You just can not do that with a factory rifle and factory ammo. People have do it for almost as long as the 7RM has been around. Same thing applies to hot-roding the 300WM.

Nothing wrong with the 7PRC or the 7RM. The 7RM has a lot more life left in it than most give it credit for. It is only limited by peoples desire and skill to hot-rod it.
Yes and no. The 7RM is a fine chambering and you can get a custom barrel, custom throat, and load it up to be on par with the 7PRC. But what you can't do is fit it into a standard long action and magazine. This is where the 7PRC shines, not because its performance is amazing but because it meets all the criteria in factory guns with factory ammuntion. Of course you can seat your bullets closer to the lands and add a little more powder to get max performance. With the proper twist in the factory barrels you can push the 180s - which you can't do with the 7RM.
 
more that gunwerks needs to promote and show their rifles are capable of kills at distances at which most of their clients shouldn't be shooting game. and that's their prerogative. it sells stupid expensive overpriced gunpackages.

how many circumstances actually require a 1k+ shot versus just working and getting closer to the animal. plus and minus. work versus marketing. doesn't equate to an ethical shot to me and many others. even if you're a KO2M level competitor with a 338 or bigger

i'll take a shot at 'long range' but that range isnt 1,000 yards. and i've shot a lot at 1000y with a lot less than a 7RM and been fine
You did not answer my question but I am used to that, by now.
 
Explain. Is this about long range? Then what is your decided limit of range on hunting an animal? Not being sarcastic, combative, just want to know.

You did not answer my question but I am used to that, by now.
I'm really giving the Gunwerks crew the benefit of the doubt: 180gr .284cal 0.345 G7 @ 3,000fps MV

It was dumb and unethical to take a shot on an elk @ >1,300 yards based on energy alone. That round drops below 1,500ft-lbs before 850 yards. That doesn't factor in the specific shooter's ability (completely missed the first shot).
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-04-26 at 7.33.18 AM.png
    Screenshot 2023-04-26 at 7.33.18 AM.png
    387.5 KB · Views: 77
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: b6graham
I wouldn't buy either of those for a rifle that is going to be mostly a sub 800 yard target rifle. The 6.8 has shit for ammo availability and its not inexpensive either, and the 6.5 PRC has decent ammo availability but its going to be about half the barrel life as a 6.5 Creedmoor while providing no real benefit at the distances you're shooting. You also don't mention what you plan to hunt out west and at what distances so the creed might cover your hunting needs too.

I'd go with a 6.5 Creedmoor or 308 in something like a Tikka CTR. If you feel need more punch for big animals buy a second rifle for that purpose. At the end of the day its another $1000 for a decent hunting rifle and if you can afford to go hunt out west then you can afford a rifle to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ma smith
I'm really giving the Gunwerks crew the benefit of the doubt: 180gr .284cal 0.345 G7 @ 3,000fps MV

It was dumb and unethical to take a shot on an elk @ >1,300 yards based on energy alone. That round drops below 1,500ft-lbs before 850 yards. That doesn't factor in the specific shooter's ability (completely missed the first shot).
You almost answered the question but not quite. And, FWIW, I would not take that far a shot, myself. But my question is still not answered.

edited to add. so, fine, I will answer the question myself. According to a quick search, the Colorado wildlife department recommends 1,500 fgt-pounds. On the chart you provided, that would be about 1,200 to 1,250 yards. Assuming you were going to define it by energy. You did not say that but that was implication. And yes, that is still to far for me. I have not spent time at a 1,000 yard range getting that good.

Is that still too far? The question was, what is the acceptable range limit to be considered an ethical shot that brings down the beast? Trust me, I an all about that but zero people, and I do mean zero people, come up with a finite answer.
 
Last edited:
You almost answered the question but not quite. And, FWIW, I would not take that far a shot, myself. But my question is still not answered.

edited to add. so, fine, I will answer the question myself. According to a quick search, the Colorado wildlife department recommends 1,500 fgt-pounds. On the chart you provided, that would be about 1,200 to 1,250 yards. Assuming you were going to define it by energy. You did not say that but that was implication. And yes, that is still to far for me. I have not spent time at a 1,000 yard range getting that good.

Is that still too far? The question was, what is the acceptable range limit to be considered an ethical shot that brings down the beast? Trust me, I an all about that but zero people, and I do mean zero people, come up with a finite answer.
Ethical to me is 100% ability to hit a 6-12" target (vital size) with absolute certainty in any possibility of absolutely horrible conditions while maintaining minimum acceptable energy for the animal in discussion and minimum acceptable velocity for bullet expansion. And the opposite end of that is super close range...too fast and too close for the bullet construction. Again defining minimum requirement for energy is up for debate too.

Going from a 223 and a white tail to 338LM and an elk thats a big spread of 'ethical' ranges completely ignoring the shooter and rifles ability

By the time you get to 1300y you're very quickly approaching the limit of a rifle platform to maintain a vital size shot...and that doesn't begin to take into account the shooter or a 2mph/30 degree shift in wind

And sometimes there are other variables. Like can you get a sighter on a rock without spooking the animal. But you can't assume that.

There's a reason that no one can define an ethical range for anyone but themselves. But I would imagine if there was a criteria that a lot of hunters would be 200-400 inside the distance they think they are good at
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tigrexar and R_A_W
You almost answered the question but not quite. And, FWIW, I would not take that far a shot, myself. But my question is still not answered.

edited to add. so, fine, I will answer the question myself. According to a quick search, the Colorado wildlife department recommends 1,500 fgt-pounds. On the chart you provided, that would be about 1,200 to 1,250 yards. Assuming you were going to define it by energy. You did not say that but that was implication. And yes, that is still to far for me. I have not spent time at a 1,000 yard range getting that good.

Is that still too far? The question was, what is the acceptable range limit to be considered an ethical shot that brings down the beast? Trust me, I an all about that but zero people, and I do mean zero people, come up with a finite answer.
No, it is not 1,200 yards, it’s ~800 yards

I didn’t give you a specific answer, because generally 1) there isn’t one and 2) you’re being a pedant
Objectively, Gunwerk’s >1,300yd shot was dumb and unethical. Subjectively, Gunwerk’s >1,300yd shot was even dumber and even less ethical.

“Who’s to say? Who’s to say?”

Common sense. That being in short supply, experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b6graham
Ethical to me is 100% ability to hit a 6-12" target (vital size) with absolute certainty in any possibility of absolutely horrible conditions while maintaining minimum acceptable energy for the animal in discussion and minimum acceptable velocity for bullet expansion.
But but but the kids shoot 24” plates @ 1,000