• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Shot show 2024

Generally speaking, it's pretty hard to get approved to import a destructive device for any reason. There are other reasons than just agencies and such. But very limited. Usually something like R&D and such. If Cadex intended to sell something like this to US civilians, they'd need to set up shop inside the US.

Thanks for pointing that out. Forgot Cadex is completely a Canadian company.

Made for a very small user group that will order very small numbers of them.

I can't imagine anti-material rifles have any role in modern militaries beyond the most niche ones.
 
Hadn't seen the bottom of it. Interesting they went with completely smooth bottom and no provisions for any pic rails.

Definitely cut as much as they could out to get the price down. Pretty sure there is no adjustment on the fit of the mag anymore.
Yeah, but we would have to see the top to tell for sure if they got rid of that hardware. I imagine they did as I agree that it appears that to bolster sales they gouged out as much cost as possible while retaining main features.

I have two rifles in later versions of the OG JAE and I still love them. They are very rigid.

I did a few things to make it fit a bit better. Got rid of their butt pad (which I did not like at all) and put on a thin Kick-eez and reduced the LOP by almost .75”….haha, I think. Between .5 and .75.

I have Tyler Kemp’s grips on them to move the grip front strap forward and reduce the reach to the trigger shoe. Very important for those of us who never played in the NBA! lol

Newer chassis offerer a wider range of adjustment and it seems rifle shooters have come to understand that you need to make the gun fit the shooter and not the other way around.

The main thing I wish the JAE had was an adjustable butt pad. I don’t care as much about canting the toe out to fit my shoulder pocket as I would a shotgun as I don’t shoot 22 lbs rifles across my body and off-hand. Haha. My butt pad is far inward where that’s not a big issue.

But I would like to adjust the pad vertically. Really, move it up a bit. I can have my buddy grind up some adjustable butt hardware (as we use on skeet guns) but that would eat up my LOP reduction from the thinner pad.

I still really like my JAE. However, in the next few months I’ll have a full up Vision with all the adjustments of new chassis. Even an adjustment up/down for the bag rider. I don’t know that I’ll like it (prob will love it) but I’ll give it a try. I almost feel like I’m cheating on my JAE’s.

One of mine. Cheers

IMG_0987.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Made for a very small user group that will order very small numbers of them.

I can't imagine anti-material rifles have any role in modern militaries beyond the most niche ones.
It's a capability they need to retain. The m107 is getting phased out in favor of the mk22 with 338 for AM. It and imo the 50 do not have enough room for modern warheads hence the bigger 45 gun vs a 150 or 200 lb 20mm. There will be places and times where you can't call in an airstrike and won't have something like a jav with you.

It's another reason why the army needed the NLOS fires system they refunded years ago. Cheap , portable long range smart missles that can used as indirect fire support. Can be used in places where you can't have an arty battery.

Knowing cadex that gun will cost 20k bare
 
It's a capability they need to retain. The m107 is getting phased out in favor of the mk22 with 338 for AM. It and imo the 50 do not have enough room for modern warheads hence the bigger 45 gun vs a 150 or 200 lb 20mm. There will be places and times where you can't call in an airstrike and won't have something like a jav with you.

It's another reason why the army needed the NLOS fires system they refunded years ago. Cheap , portable long range smart missles that can used as indirect fire support. Can be used in places where you can't have an arty battery.

Knowing cadex that gun will cost 20k bare
Its listed at 16k $ at Shot
 
It's a capability they need to retain. The m107 is getting phased out in favor of the mk22 with 338 for AM. It and imo the 50 do not have enough room for modern warheads hence the bigger 45 gun vs a 150 or 200 lb 20mm. There will be places and times where you can't call in an airstrike and won't have something like a jav with you.

It's another reason why the army needed the NLOS fires system they refunded years ago. Cheap , portable long range smart missles that can used as indirect fire support. Can be used in places where you can't have an arty battery.

Knowing cadex that gun will cost 20k bare
So the additional <2mm of bullet diameter makes it large enough for modern warheads?

Give us an example of when you can’t call in an air strike/drone strike.

Don’t get me wrong, gigantic rifles are kewl, and military procurement can be fucked, but I guarantee you that shooting guns for actual anti-material is as much bullshit when a global hawk can do X1000 without risking men. The reason for this rifle would be you didn’t have the money for air support or hundreds of missile equipped drones. Maybe on Canada’s defense budget this is the best they can do, but I don’t see it as anything other than a funny-car sniper rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bradu
So the additional <2mm of bullet diameter makes it large enough for modern warheads?
IIRC the other guys is basically correct. The 338NM is assigned to cary API and other 'payloads' for mk22 program. If you don't think a monster .50 cal vs .338 is going to increase available payload capacity--volumetrically--well, double-check your math...
 
It's a capability they need to retain. The m107 is getting phased out in favor of the mk22 with 338 for AM. It and imo the 50 do not have enough room for modern warheads hence the bigger 45 gun vs a 150 or 200 lb 20mm. There will be places and times where you can't call in an airstrike and won't have something like a jav with you.

It's another reason why the army needed the NLOS fires system they refunded years ago. Cheap , portable long range smart missles that can used as indirect fire support. Can be used in places where you can't have an arty battery.

Knowing cadex that gun will cost 20k bare
A 44 pound 6ft long rifle is pretty dumb when you could carry a few of these and have greater effect. no NLOS system needed. https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/ne...ld-get-this-40-mm-laser-guided-grenade-round/

SOF was using this with great effect. Being harassed by a PKM along a ridgline 2000m out, bye bye!
 
what does "Also completely user replaceable" mean?
Does that mean I can buy the new screen and add it to my Mark II?
It means if you were to drop something onto this screen and break it, or whatever, you can easily buy a replacement screen off Amazon for not many dollars.
 
So the additional <2mm of bullet diameter makes it large enough for modern warheads?

Give us an example of when you can’t call in an air strike/drone strike.

Don’t get me wrong, gigantic rifles are kewl, and military procurement can be fucked, but I guarantee you that shooting guns for actual anti-material is as much bullshit when a global hawk can do X1000 without risking men. The reason for this rifle would be you didn’t have the money for air support or hundreds of missile equipped drones. Maybe on Canada’s defense budget this is the best they can do, but I don’t see it as anything other than a funny-car sniper rifle.
Sof were in Iraq killing people and shit for 6 months before bushes whole surrender or we invade. The public support would have been shit if we knew they were lying about wmd and the threat to surrender. Lots of other examples like maybe "ukrainians" going into Russia to kill people and shit or "trainers" inbedded in other conflicts we don't want to admit.

If the capability was not needed it wouldn't be speced in solicitations.
 
That Gen2 Bravo seems nice for sure.
IMG_20240124_214110_064.jpg


The Walnut MDT is pretty neat...I wasn't expecting that.
Screenshot_20240126-095935-439.png


Hornady HIT indicators.
IMG_20240123_102301045_HDR.jpg

IMG_20240123_102321530_HDR.jpg


MDT's version. No lights, just sound effects at your bases station. Uses radio comms between receivers...two mile LOS capabilities, if using just "ping" sounds, you can have unlimited targets, or designate up to 8 identified targets.
IMG_20240123_111301247.jpg


Nighforce's new spotter is sharp, compact and pretty neat. $3,000 slick....a tad over $3,000 if you want the cage.
Screenshot_20240126-100938-569.png

Available in MiL, MOA, and Tremor-4.
Screenshot_20240126-101000-722.png


New thermals from AGM.
IMG_20240123_092224352_HDR.jpg
 
Not super exciting, but I'm kind of interested in this new scope. Reticle is basic mill & suits my needs. Short, light, locking, zero stop.

@gr8fuldoug posted it in one of his shot blogs. Any word on when it'll be available?

 
  • Like
Reactions: PBWalsh
Re: KRG new offerings & CTR mags

I didn’t quite catch if any of the updates KRG chassis will be CTR compatible?
 





Starting at 10 minute 30 seconds - Accutac releasing 2-in-1 ARCA/Picatinny mount and a horseshoe type bipod. For current Accutac bipod owners - the mount will be available for retrofit into your existing bipod.


Pretty smart to finally release a 2-in-1 mount. Wish I hadnt already bought their arca-only mount like 6 months ago..
 
That’s what kept me from buying an accutac during Black Friday when they were 30% off…
 
That’s what kept me from buying an accutac during Black Friday when they were 30% off…
I ended up getting their Arca mount for my FC4-G2, figured the bipod itself was a sunken cost by then, instead of buying something else. Liked it overall, but really wanted arca for it..which I am new to.

To solve for the 2-in-1 mount dilemma, I bought one for my Atlas bipod instead, off the hide. A RRS-SOAR, which is an impressive piece of mount.

Now the Accu-tac lives on my heavy ass MPA rifle...as an arca-only bipod, and my new Atlas CAL Gen 2 is the dual purpose.

Eventually I might grab a picatinny-only mount as well...to keep on the stuff that wont get an Arca rail, like my oryx chassis Tikka 22..

No matter the issue, the industry finds a way to sell us something :)

However, Accu-tac would carve out an even larger chunk of the overall bipod market, if other companies started offering mounts compatible for their bipods..
 
Last edited:
According to John Ross those AM rifles are great for shooting down ATF helicopters. They sold them in magazines as Nazi surplus as late as 1957.
View attachment 8333169

$2,868.10 with a 100 round case in 2024 dollars. I'll take four, and an additional ten cases of ammo.
Reminds me of Thunderbolt and Lightfoot
.
Featured-170911-Thunderbolt.jpg


images.jpg
 
> designed for sniper applications
>big ol fuckoff reflective dome lens

you’d think they’d do something about it for that application.
 
I know it may have been mentioned but if you haven't check out CameraLandNY/ @gr8fuldoug Excellent daily summaries.

Also thanks to all those who posted updates, didn't go off topic on DDs and put up with my constant whining for TB updates.
 
Tell me you don’t have a clue about thermal without telling me you don’t have a clue about thermal.
put a different way: since obscuring the lens is not an option, you would think they would have used a different objective design that did not have the reflective nature of the one shown.

I’ve dealt with thermals for coyote and hog hunting (borrowed units for now)
 
put a different way: since obscuring the lens is not an option, you would think they would have used a different objective design that did not have the reflective nature of the one shown.

I’ve dealt with thermals for coyote and hog hunting (borrowed units for now)

Are you making an assumption here, or do you know for sure it's reflective enough to matter?

That would imply they completely overlooked something that is pretty standard practice to make sure doesn't happen.
 
put a different way: since obscuring the lens is not an option, you would think they would have used a different objective design that did not have the reflective nature of the one shown.

I’ve dealt with thermals for coyote and hog hunting (borrowed units for now)
These are primarily used at times when there is no light to reflect off the lens.
 
Alright finally saw the sac press, I dig it. Not sure if I'd dump my co ax for it but if I was starting fresh, I'd probably pick it up. A friend and I was discussing what if they made a turret head for the zero press that allowed the user to switch out dies with their lok ring 🤭?
 
Last edited: