• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Casual KAC SR-15 Comparison [a study in performance]

Bakwa

Prophetic Marksman
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Mar 22, 2017
    1,652
    1,114
    FL
    Long story short, I'm giving KAC small frame uppers another try after getting burned by them ~10yrs ago.
    This thread will showcase my findings on how the current factory KAC SR-15 11.5" [with 3.2 BCG] upper stacks up against a few known good uppers to include a 11.5" FBI ODG "Fed" upper, a Centurion 11.5" upper, and a Colt 11.5" "Old HRT" upper for the comparison.
    This study will span the next 2-3 months with updates at least every other week.

    In this test, I'll be observing the following,

    Reliability:
    This will be observed through the duration of the tests and across a number of ammunition types, paying close attention to ejection patterns with different buffer weights.
    Accuracy: Groups will be shot out of the uppers with multiple types of match and non-match type ammunition, and will be documented.
    Felt recoil: This will be measured using split times on drills. Presumably, split times will be faster on uppers that are gassed more efficiently [this will be tested suppressed and unsuppressed]. There will also be a subjective set of notes regarding this data point.
    Balance: This will necessarily be subjective, but will be tested with the uppers slick, as well as with accessories on them. Overall weights with and without accessories will be noted.

    Uppers to be tested:
    -KAC SR-15 11.5" Mod 2 E3 with 3.2 BCG, with Aimpoint T2 on Unity 2.26" riser.
    -FBI Fed near clone upper: FCD upper, BRT 11.5" barrel, Geissele "Fed" ODG HG, LMT E-BCG, and SF 4-prong FH, with Aimpint Comp M5 on Unity 2.26" riser.
    -Centurion 11.5" flat top, A2 front sight, with FF extended C4 quad, and SF 4-prong FH, with Holosun RD on MI 1.93" riser.
    -Colt heavy "Fed HRT" 11.5" flat top, A2 front sight, KAC RAS M4 HG, Bootleg Adjustable BCG, and SF Closed-tine FH, with Aimpoint Comp M5s.

    Lower to be tested on:
    LMT MARS factory lower [SBR] with SSA-E FCG and SOPMOD stock.

    Known limitations of this casual study:
    The primary control for the tests will be the home-built Fed upper with BRT barrel. Though it isn't a factory upper, it is the upper I have the most recent time behind. This should allow me to use it as a reliable benchmark for felt performance. In doing this, when I compare it against the Centurion and Colt upper, it will grant perspective on the overall standing it has in the group, thus providing a useful data set to compare against the KAC upper.
    All of these uppers are samples of one. Each individual upper may not be representative of its brand or type. There may be defects in parts, or these examples may be exceptional when compared to the norm from these manufacturers.
    A large portion of these tests could be construed as subjective. As a human I have my explicit, implicit, and unknown biases.

    Final thoughts pre-study:
    Pictures will come throughout the thread. [We all know that's what everyone wants.]
    Please let me know if there's a data-point you want me to include or expand upon.
    I hope this study puts into perspective the performance of decent upper options and helps someone make a decision on what to buy [or not buy].

    I will be adding results to this first post as I they come.
    Stay tuned!

    Cheers!
    IMG_9015.jpeg
    IMG_9006.jpeg



    Session 1

    Actions Observed:

    I took out the KAC and Gisele uppers.
    100rds of PPU 55gr were fired through each.
    I put a rough 50yd zero on each and played with targets from 20yds to 50yds.
    I shot from the standing & kneeling testing my perceived ability to recover, get back on target, and take another shot.

    Take Aways:

    Failures: 0
    The recoil impulse with both was smooth for a short barrel and carbine length gas system. They felt different, but at this point I couldn't quite explain why.

    Learned: The KAC upper felt fine with the H buffer that was already in the lower, but ejection was weak; rounds were just falling out of the receiver at 4 o'clock. After switching to the provided KAC buffer, the upper was ejecting at normal strength to 3 o'clock.
    The Geissele upper ejected roughly the same distance at 3 to 4 o'clock with both buffers. I believe this is due to the LMT E-BCG slowing the lockup and bleeding excess gas out of the extra hole in side of the carrier.

    Session 2

    Actions Observed:
    I brought out all four 11.5" uppers, and a token 10.3" Crane spec suppressed rifle for flavor.
    300rds of PPU 55gr and 60rds of Federal M855 were fired amongst all four of the 11.5" uppers.
    The goal on this outing was to fire 3-6 round fast strings to gauge reliability, felt recoil impulse, how much the dot was jumping, and and how confident I felt in the follow-up-shots after each trigger pull.
    I used the KAC buffer for all of these tests to keep it consistent. Ejection for all of the uppers was from 3-4 o'clock and they ejected at normal distance.

    Take Aways:

    Failures: There was one stoppage in the Centurion upper. One of the PPU cartridges didn't seat all the way in the chamber and the bolt was half way cammed into battery. The cartridge would not easily extract, so I collapsed the stock and mortared it without having to apply much force. I observed that the casing was dented below the shoulder. I don't know if it was loaded into the magazine that way or if it became dented upon ejecting it, but I put it back in the same upper and it fired/extracted/ejected just fine. Until I see more of a pattern, I'm going to chalk that one up as ammo related.

    Dot Jump: The movement of the dot while firing quickly was similar amongst all of the rifles in the group. The Colt [old style] HRT upper was probably the worst, but not by much. The others were very comparable.

    Felt Recoil Impulse and Confidence Getting Into the Gun: The felt recoil to my shoulder was similar between the KAC and BRT Geissele Fed upper, as was the Centurion similar to the Colt HRT upper. The interesting part was how the impulse displayed itself in each upper. The KAC seemed to have the most notable delayed impulse. It felt like it was punching my shoulder all the same as the Fed upper, but it was doing it in such a way that I felt more confident in driving the gun on target, getting into it, and shooting quickly. I'll have to repeat this test with a timer to determine if this is mostly perception or it I was faster on it.
    The felt recoil impulse on the Centurion and the Colt were similar to each other, but the gross recoil was slightly more from the Colt. This was expected.
    The Centurion and the Fed upper felt just as fast, but the recoil impulses were just different. The Centurion [by comparison with the Fed upper] had a more abrupt recoil impulse. With the dot jump being about the same, I found that I could knuckle down into the gun and shoot as fast wit the Centurion as I could with the Fed upper [just with more effort in thinking about controlling the gun through the string].

    Suppressed: I couldn't help myself, so I fired 6rds through each upper with a Surefire SB2 [except I didn't shoot the KAC upper suppressed because I haven't changed out the muzzle device yet]. All of the uppers ran reliably without adjusting or changing anything. They all ejected to the 1 to 2 o'clock. The Fed upper felt the best so far a recoil impulse out of the bunch. There will be dedicated suppressor tests down the road.

    Session 3

    Actions Observed:

    All four 11.5" uppers went out again, and 240rds of Patriot Sports 55gr FMJ was shot through them.
    Patriot Sports ammo is Czech made and can be found for "cheaper" right now.
    The goal was to shoot all of the uppers suppressed for this session, but time was tighter, so instead I ran reload drills and 3-10rds fast fire strings.
    The KAC buffer stayed in the lower the entire time for all uppers.
    Ejection with this ammo was at 3-3:30 [~5ft] for all of the uppers except the SR-15 which was at 4-5 o'clock and 7ft. This was interesting.

    Take Aways:
    Failures: 0

    Felt Recoil & Dot Jump: I want to amend a previous observation. The more that I shoot these uppers, the more that I'm realizing the KAC upper is just different. The recoil in the SR-15 upper isn't less than the Fed upper with the BRT barrel. The recoil is certainly more, but the impulse is unique and inspires confidence in shooting quickly when getting into the gun. If you hold the gun [SR-15] loosely, almost like a novice would, then you definitely feel that it recoils more. The Fed upper recoils smoothly, and now I can confidently say has the least dot jump out of any of the uppers. The Colt upper and Centurion upper are still perceived as very similar.


    IMG_9284.jpeg
    IMG_9296.jpeg



    I do have a SF muzzle device on the KAC now so hopefully we'll get some suppressed results soon!

    IMG_9260.jpeg


    Cheers!
     
    Last edited:
    Eh the 11.5 is the worst KAC to study. Same gas length and 0.070” port like any Crane-spec barrel, just added KAC flavor on the gun. The 14.5” and 16” models have more unique specifications re: gas.
    Fair point.

    However, this makes the comparison among the 11.5's an even more prudent one, considering the uppers will be so close in spec. My primary concern is re-addressing the QC and overall durability/reliability/function of current KAC produced products. Should this KAC be up to snuff, I'd be open to sourcing a 14.5" SR-15 upper to compare against other 14.5" uppers available in order to demonstrate the supposed supremacy of the KAC gas systems. ;)
     
    • Like
    Reactions: MysizeisMAGNUM
    Eh the 11.5 is the worst KAC to study. Same gas length and 0.070” port like any Crane-spec barrel, just added KAC flavor on the gun. The 14.5” and 16” models have more unique specifications re: gas.
    But it still uses the improved BCG system, which to my understanding, nobody has broken one yet.
     
    Wow, those Unity mounts really look tall; those Aimpoints could use guy wires! I might have to try one sometime.
    For a truly heads up position while shooting and for passively aiming through night vision, this is the way.





    Just make sure you account for your height over bore. I've missed varmint sized targets up close by forgetting this key concept. :LOL:
     
    For a truly heads up position while shooting and for passively aiming through night vision, this is the way.





    Just make sure you account for your height over bore. I've missed varmint sized targets up close by forgetting this key concept. :LOL:
    I prefer longer barrels but agree with you for nods. My go to setup is an ACOG with a top mounted red dot which is close to your height.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bakwa
    Here let me save you some time, you will find almost no difference because they difference is in the noise.

    A sample size of one really means jack shit by the way. This is why testing is done in groups with a sample size big enough to actually matter.

    Otherwise the data is almost worthless.
     
    Here let me save you some time, you will find almost no difference because they difference is in the noise.

    A sample size of one really means jack shit by the way. This is why testing is done in groups with a sample size big enough to actually matter.

    Otherwise the data is almost worthless.
    Thank you for reiterating what I already stated in my "known limitations" section in the first post.

    Some people are capable of reading multiple opinions, observing multiple examples, and then synthesizing for consistency [or lack thereof] as well as recognizing patterns, then they make cogent judgements based on the respective data points at hand. It's called inductive reasoning.

    I only pity you if you don't understand how that works.

    Please refrain from shit-posting further unless you have something erudite to contribute.

    Cheers
     
    Thank you for reiterating what I already stated in my "known limitations" section in the first post.

    Some people are capable of reading multiple opinions, observing multiple examples, and then synthesizing for consistency [or lack thereof] as well as recognizing patterns, then they make cogent judgements based on the respective data points at hand. It's called inductive reasoning.

    I only pity you if you don't understand how that works.

    Please refrain from shit-posting further unless you have something erudite to contribute.

    Cheers
    SCHOOLED!!!!!!😀😀😀😂😂😂
     
    I read your entire post. Doesn't make anything I said less true.

    If this test was 15 years ago, when quality of guns was across the spectrum, then maybe you would be on to something.

    Instead you have a bunch of shit that are all copies of each other, with PIP leapfroggimg each other. There is little difference other than some proprietary kac bolt stuff, that probally won't make a difference since you aren't putting 30k+ through each gun and don't have enough of a sample size. Things like port size have been fleshed out and most of the small parts are made by the same vendors. Barrel differences are negligible.

    No legitimate testing is done in samples of 1. Your test is flawed and any results you think you see probally mean nothing. Atleast nothing anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together would use to make a purchasing decision. Some ignorant newbie will use that bad information to push a narritive that is just as niave.

    If you knew what you think you do, this would be obvious. But feel free to waste your time and money if it makes you feel better.

    Not trying to beat you up, just being honest.

    *From someone who has been building ars for over 20 years and owns or has owned just about every brand including every iteration from KAC, Colt, BCM, LMT in that time frame. I am a huge KAC fan but you will not see much of any difference out of any of those 11.5" uppers, like has already been stated
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Genesis1984
    I read your entire post. Doesn't make anything I said less true.

    If this test was 15 years ago, when quality of guns was across the spectrum, then maybe you would be on to something.

    Instead you have a bunch of shit that are all copies of each other, with PIP leapfroggimg each other. There is little difference other than some proprietary kac bolt stuff, that probally won't make a difference since you aren't putting 30k+ through each gun and don't have enough of a sample size. Things like port size have been fleshed out and most of the small parts are made by the same vendors. Barrel differences are negligible.

    No legitimate testing is done in samples of 1. Your test is flawed and any results you think you see probally mean nothing. Atleast nothing anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together would use to make a purchasing decision. Some ignorant newbie will use that bad information to push a narritive that is just as niave.

    If you knew what you think you do, this would be obvious. But feel free to waste your time and money if it makes you feel better.

    Not trying to beat you up, just being honest.

    *From someone who has been building ars for over 20 years and owns or has owned just about every brand including every iteration from KAC, Colt, BCM, LMT in that time frame. I am a huge KAC fan but you will not see much of any difference out of any of those 11.5" uppers, like has already been stated
    I get what you're trying to say. I really do.
    But do you scour the internet in search of everyone doing reviews or comparisons to warn them of the grave dangers of under represented data figures? Did I insult your mother or something? Why you have such a stake in this thread is beyond me.

    This is intended to be a fun comparison of a few quality uppers I have. I will give my opinion. And hopefully when someone is deep-diving on Knights uppers/rifles, they'll stumble upon this review/comparison and use it as a single data piece in their larger decision they will make.

    Why don't you go tell Rob Ski to stop reviewing AK's, or tell the writers of Car magazine that they don't rate to write an article after test driving an automobile. Go somewhere else with your [over 20yrs] of wisdom and piss on someone else's breakfast.
     
    I read your entire post. Doesn't make anything I said less true.

    If this test was 15 years ago, when quality of guns was across the spectrum, then maybe you would be on to something.

    Instead you have a bunch of shit that are all copies of each other, with PIP leapfroggimg each other. There is little difference other than some proprietary kac bolt stuff, that probally won't make a difference since you aren't putting 30k+ through each gun and don't have enough of a sample size. Things like port size have been fleshed out and most of the small parts are made by the same vendors. Barrel differences are negligible.

    No legitimate testing is done in samples of 1. Your test is flawed and any results you think you see probally mean nothing. Atleast nothing anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together would use to make a purchasing decision. Some ignorant newbie will use that bad information to push a narritive that is just as niave.

    If you knew what you think you do, this would be obvious. But feel free to waste your time and money if it makes you feel better.

    Not trying to beat you up, just being honest.

    *From someone who has been building ars for over 20 years and owns or has owned just about every brand including every iteration from KAC, Colt, BCM, LMT in that time frame. I am a huge KAC fan but you will not see much of any difference out of any of those 11.5" uppers, like has already been stated
    Dude. You literally can’t help yourself can you. You’re and asshole in just above every post I see. You must be one miserable son of a bitch. I feel sorry for you, truly.
     
    Here let me save you some time, you will find almost no difference because they difference is in the noise.

    A sample size of one really means jack shit by the way. This is why testing is done in groups with a sample size big enough to actually matter.

    Otherwise the data is almost worthless.
    With firearms, that is not really the case. For instance, when the USMC was looking to choose their service rifle they had manufacturers submit two rifles. When it comes to manufacturing widgets, if your process is good then the difference from one to the next is so small that it makes large number comparison kind of pointless.
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: Genesis1984
    I am a huge KAC fan but you will not see much of any difference out of any of those 11.5" uppers, like has already been stated
    You will if something breaks. One of the uppers is milspec and you can fix and change the parts yourself with readily available tools and parts. One of them is made with proprietary parts designed by the finest minds of the swamp people tribe. There was a window last week when we had a full eclipse and during the time the sun was not showing, KAC opened up sales on their barrel wrench.
     
    You will if something breaks. One of the uppers is milspec and you can fix and change the parts yourself with readily available tools and parts. One of them is made with proprietary parts designed by the finest minds of the swamp people tribe. There was a window last week when we had a full eclipse and during the time the sun was not showing, KAC opened up sales on their barrel wrench.
    Can you cite examples of the SR-15 breaking?

    There are 3rd party sources for their barrel wrench by the way.
     
    Can you cite examples of the SR-15 breaking?

    There are 3rd party sources for their barrel wrench by the way.

    Nefarious Arms makes decent parts for KAC. I have their reaction rod.

    As much as I love my sr15, I can see why people are going different routes for ar15's these days. The civi consumer market for KAC is not a great one.
     
    Last edited:
    Can you cite examples of the SR-15 breaking?

    There are 3rd party sources for their barrel wrench by the way.
    Yeah mine broke. I posted about it before. I had to wait months to get the handguard off (because someone on arf.com mailed me one). Also if you go to their site, they sell a field repair kit. My assumption is they sell it because shit breaks in the field.
     
    Yeah mine broke. I posted about it before. I had to wait months to get the handguard off (because someone on arf.com mailed me one). Also if you go to their site, they sell a field repair kit. My assumption is they sell it because shit breaks in the field.

    Anything can break.

    People are fooling themselves if they think KAC stuff is unbreakable.

    Well engineered and designed, certainly. But not unbreakable.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bakwa
    You will if something breaks. One of the uppers is milspec and you can fix and change the parts yourself with readily available tools and parts. One of them is made with proprietary parts designed by the finest minds of the swamp people tribe. There was a window last week when we had a full eclipse and during the time the sun was not showing, KAC opened up sales on their barrel wrench.
    You will be happy to know that should you break an e3 bolt( which won't happen) you can use mil spec parts and it will run. I bought my wrench like 20 years ago when building sr25 and mk11s. Sr15 have been my primary carbines since the mod 0s came out, and I can't break it and it runs on anything including tula and wolf.
     
    Yeah mine broke. I posted about it before. I had to wait months to get the handguard off (because someone on arf.com mailed me one). Also if you go to their site, they sell a field repair kit. My assumption is they sell it because shit breaks in the field.
    What broke?

    They sell the field repair kits becuase all of those parts are consumables/likely parts to fail in any DI AR.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bakwa
    With firearms, that is not really the case. For instance, when the USMC was looking to choose their service rifle they had manufacturers submit two rifles. When it comes to manufacturing widgets, if your process is good then the difference from one to the next is so small that it makes large number comparison kind of pointless.
    Wrong. If you think the USMC based a selection off sample size of two, you are high. It may have been part of an RFI submission but not the actual testing/downselect. Aberdeen is the center of small arms testing and it's in my backyard. Besides doing acquisition when I was in the army( and working at both Aberdeen and Edgewood in both a uniform and a suit) I got a ton of buddies who work there now, including engineers on small arms program teams. The 6 arc testing alone was dozens of guns ( barrels were chambered there) and pallets of bullets just to check the viability of the cartridge. Other army commands also were doing concurrent testing of the round for their own purposes. The point is no major weapons selection is made without big sample testing under defined protocols. Hell the mk23 pistol program which was a fraction of the size of the m27 had almost 2 dozen samples that were tested by crane. Most of them are sitting in the armory on the navy yard in DC, where I also worked helping curate the navy small arms collection.
     
    Anything can break.

    People are fooling themselves if they think KAC stuff is unbreakable.

    Well engineered and designed, certainly. But not unbreakable.
    Nobody in this thread said their stuff doesn't break. I asked for examples of things that have broken, and have yet to hear any.

    The SR-15 is a solid platform but I wouldn't buy one at the current prices. Pre panic/recent wars, it was a lot of gun for the money.
     
    Your findings and opinions are worthless flotsam. You have defiled your KAC by mating it to a lower of lesser pedigree. It’s like Humperdink marrying that useless narcissist, Buttercup. Or Forrest marrying that filthy whore, Jenny.

    You are a miserable failure.
     
    Bro is mad because he can out together whatever the best parts he deems but it will never be an sr15. I get it, kac stuff is overpriced and over blown (i have a few complete rifles myself) but the never ending brand bashing is ‘tarded.

    Btw, people use the term “sample size one” to respawn into a conversation where they are killed but it does not work😂
     
    Your findings and opinions are worthless flotsam. You have defiled your KAC by mating it to a lower of lesser pedigree. It’s like Humperdink marrying that useless narcissist, Buttercup. Or Forrest marrying that filthy whore, Jenny.

    You are a miserable failure.
    Everytime i see an upper with a different brand lower i am like ewwwww. (No offense OP)
     
    Dude. You literally can’t help yourself can you. You’re and asshole in just above every post I see. You must be one miserable son of a bitch. I feel sorry for you, truly.
    People can build what they want and honestly, alot of the time, its really going to be hard to know if some premium piece of gucci gear is worth the premium.

    I still think they make some really good stuff, but I think that time when there was one vendor on top of the mountain has long gone, at least for uppers/AR's and as long as that end user is happy, and the upper does what they are looking for, more power to them.

    HK, LMT, Geiselle, Noveski, KAC its all splitting hairs at a point. I would boil it all down to availability at this point, what vendor makes a configuration that you want, and who can actually get it to you in an acceptable amount of time.

    For me, I am willing to deal with the LMT "learing machining together" memes because they have always been able to get me stuff when I need it. I find that far easier to deal with than KAC tying their production schedule to the solar calendar.
     
    For me, I am willing to deal with the LMT "learing machining together" memes because they have always been able to get me stuff when I need it. I find that far easier to deal with than KAC tying their production schedule to the solar calendar.

    You mean you don't want to wait months for a single upper (in a size you don't even want) to appear on Rooftop, only to be sold out in .9 seconds?
     
    I read your entire post. Doesn't make anything I said less true.

    If this test was 15 years ago, when quality of guns was across the spectrum, then maybe you would be on to something.

    Instead you have a bunch of shit that are all copies of each other, with PIP leapfroggimg each other. There is little difference other than some proprietary kac bolt stuff, that probally won't make a difference since you aren't putting 30k+ through each gun and don't have enough of a sample size. Things like port size have been fleshed out and most of the small parts are made by the same vendors. Barrel differences are negligible.

    No legitimate testing is done in samples of 1. Your test is flawed and any results you think you see probally mean nothing. Atleast nothing anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together would use to make a purchasing decision. Some ignorant newbie will use that bad information to push a narritive that is just as niave.

    If you knew what you think you do, this would be obvious. But feel free to waste your time and money if it makes you feel better.

    Not trying to beat you up, just being honest.

    *From someone who has been building ars for over 20 years and owns or has owned just about every brand including every iteration from KAC, Colt, BCM, LMT in that time frame. I am a huge KAC fan but you will not see much of any difference out of any of those 11.5" uppers, like has already been stated
    Edgewood Arsenal is where they did the terminal ballistics testing for the Warren Commission with 6.5 Carcano against human cadavers, live goats, severed human arms (for Connally’s wrist/hand injuries), and human skulls encased in ballistics gel for JFK’s skull.

    The chief ballistician, Dr. Joseph Dolce, complained that he wasn’t allowed to submit the final summary of their findings to the WC, and that a younger technician/engineer was elected instead to present contradictory findings that undermined his own experiments during their tests.

    The ammunition used was from a CIA Contract through DoD to the Western Cartridge Company from 1954, which was for the purposes of combating communist actions in an undisclosed country at the time. The spent cases left on the 6th floor were unique in that they had the Lot code from the first 1 million rounds produced for that contract, namely 6000, because the lot codes were part of the head stamps (unlike most DoD cartridges, which simply have an arsenal and date code). Normally you can only see the lot code printed on the boxes.

    A unique thing about those Western Cartridge limited production 6.5x52 cartridges was that the projectiles used very low antimony composition in the lead, making them very soft and susceptible to fragmentation/deformation. As a result, they could never duplicate Connally’s injuries with a bullet that had also perforated a human cadaver prior to entering Connally’s back.

    By Joseph R. Dolce, MD, FACS​

    I am the Chief Consultant for the US Army in wound ballistics at the Edgewood Arsenal and Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. I have been dealing with high velocity missles for the Army for the past twenty–five years and I feel that there are no forensic pathologists in this country who have had the experience I have had with this type of missile. The forensic pathologist in civilian life, deals primarily with homicides caused by slow velocity missiles.

    I appeared before the investigating team of the Warren Commission at the VA Building in Washington, D.C. on April 21, 1964. At that time, I reviewed all the X–rays and Zapruder film along with Governor Connaley [sic], his wife and his doctors. At that time, Governor Connaley sat on my right, while reviewing the Zapruder films and he (Governor Connaley) specifically told me, that he did not know that his wrist was injured until he reacted fully from anesthestia [sic] and noted a plaster cast on his right hand and forearm — but, in an interview with Life magazine — he goes on to say how his wrist was injured.

    I am disturbed as to why I was not asked by the Warren Commission to give final testimony, even though Doctors Olivier and Dzimean [sic], to whom I serve as their Consultant were called, to give final testimony. I had advised these doctors to conduct certain experiments at Edgewood — which they did — and their findings were not consistent with their testimony.

    If we’re going to derail this sucker, let’s do it right! :cool:
    iu
     
    Your findings and opinions are worthless flotsam. You have defiled your KAC by mating it to a lower of lesser pedigree. It’s like Humperdink marrying that useless narcissist, Buttercup. Or Forrest marrying that filthy whore, Jenny.

    You are a miserable failure.
    Laughs in KAC SR15 upper / LMT MARS-L lower 😘😘😘
     
    @clcustom1911
    That's by no means a new lower either. I just never took off the sticker. It's now rubbed/faded off white and have no more legible markings on it.
    It's now a point of pride to keep it there and see how it wears [and if it will ever just fall off].
    Eventually I'll paint over it.

    BTW, nice master hybrid gun. I'm beginning to see the way.:cool: