Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need to use heat tempilaq to figure that out correctly.Just making sure there is no problem with the heat transferring further down the case .
More details about your annealing process would help. . . like, how long in the flame; what part of the flame touching what part(s) of the case. . . ???Just making sure there is no problem with the heat transferring further down the case .
Yes, this can help relieve any concern about heat traveling down the body by putting a line of this from the neck to the web. But, 400°C/750°F still isn't going to do much of anything to the body unless it's at that temperature for something like 30 seconds.You need to use heat tempilaq to figure that out correctly.
![]()
Tempilaq Temperature Indicator 400 Degree 2oz
This non-flammable, quick-drying fluid dries to a dull matte finish then liquefies when the rated temperature is reached. When rated temperature is...www.midwayusa.com
Before I got my AMP, I made my own flame annealer apparatus. I perfected annealing on that thing - I still think it was as good or better than what I get on the AMP (the AMP is a ton easier and quicker, though). I'm going to call out something @straightshooter1 wrote:3 1/2 -4 countView attachment 8685465
From what I can make out in this picture of yours, it appears the center of the flame in pointing at the shoulder-body junction??? It's recommended that it should be pointing to the neck-shoulder junction where the neck can take on the heat the fastest and the most grain structure change.3 1/2 -4 countView attachment 8685465
Ah yes . . . with longer time there's more revolutions for the neck to get heated uniformly. I really feel going to a swirl flame provided additional consistency to the time in it.Before I got my AMP, I made my own flame annealer apparatus. I perfected annealing on that thing - I still think it was as good or better than what I get on the AMP (the AMP is a ton easier and quicker, though). I'm going to call out something @straightshooter1 wrote:
"Like I'm at 9-10 seconds in the flame"
The longer your annealing time, the less opportunity for variance. By pulling the flame back and lengthening the time, you might find some additional consistency.
Yes, the pencil flame is more precise, but the swirl is a little hotter and the faster I can heat up the neck the sooner I can drop the case out of the flame. And the sooner the case is out of the flame, less heat will flow down the case. That's my theory behind it.I found that using a pencil flame torch like the one below allowed for more precise heating and kept the heat away from the body.
![]()
Bernzomatic Classic Brass Torch for Propane Gas Cylinder UL2317 - The Home Depot
Soldering, thawing frozen locks, lighting grills and fires can be a breeze by choosing this Bernzomatic Pencil Flame Brass Torch. Compatible with propane fuel.www.homedepot.com
If you change the option selected you get a different picture based on that selection: what jrb said stands, test lower down the body with a lower degree to measure the heat migration if you are worried about it.Yes, this can help relieve any concern about heat traveling down the body by putting a line of this from the neck to the web. But, 400°C/750°F still isn't going to do much of anything to the body unless it's at that temperature for something like 30 seconds.I doubt the body ever gets to that temperature for much more than a second when a neck glows (say, 1200°F) for but a second or a fraction of a second.
![]()
Slower = less heat/unit of timeSlow vs fast? Does not matter.
Are you talking for actual torch time? I want that as short as possible and is part of the reason I run a dual torch AGS. Less time and chance for the bottom of the case to heat up. If you are talking cool down? It doesnt matter IMHO. Is it possible the heat might migrate down into the base? Yes, but I dont think its a real issue as you would need to get the base in excess of 600 degrees to even cause any real change in the brass.Slower = less heat/unit of time
less heat/unit of time = less impact of timing variations on heating (also, as @straightshooter1 mentions, less impact of rotational differences)
Pretty obvious to most people...
It's not just reaching that the 600°F, but also how much time it's at 600°F. I assume you're talking about Fahrenheit??? 600°F is only ~ 316°C . . . which is not enough to do any level of annealing unless is for a very long time. Annealing (or the "flash annealing" that we do) the brass is best done at 650°C (1,200°F)Are you talking for actual torch time? I want that as short as possible and is part of the reason I run a dual torch AGS. Less time and chance for the bottom of the case to heat up. If you are talking cool down? It doesnt matter IMHO. Is it possible the heat might migrate down into the base? Yes, but I dont think its a real issue as you would need to get the base in excess of 600 degrees to even cause any real change in the brass.
And what about the cool down time that he was talking about?It's not just reaching that the 600°F, but also how much time it's at 600°F. I assume you're talking about Fahrenheit??? 600°F is only ~ 316°C . . . which is not enough to do any level of annealing unless is for a very long time. Annealing (or the "flash annealing" that we do) the brass is best done at 650°C (1,200°F).
When the brass drops out of the flame, it cools down VERY fast. It won't stay hot enough long enough to be an issue that affects the hardness, especially at the web area of a case. The rate of cooldown is an exponential curve where it's fastest from the higher temperatures and slower at the lower temperatures. This has something to do with Newton's Law of Cooling.And what about the cool down time that he was talking about?
Are you talking for actual torch time? I want that as short as possible and is part of the reason I run a dual torch AGS. Less time and chance for the bottom of the case to heat up.