Which 18” 5.56 Barrel

Which 18” 5.56 Barrel

  • Centurion

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • JP Ultramatch

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Rainier Arms Ultramatch

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • Proof

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Douglas

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • White Oak

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Wilson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Craddock

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • Criterion

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
None of the above.
How is Craddock not on the list?

Most of those are unlikely to disappoint tbh.

Yeah Craddock Bartlein is my go to.

Dang. I meant to put Craddock on there. My biggest concern there is waiting 8-10 months. They are my first choice too but the lead time kinda kills it for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
18" have such big gas ports to match proper dwell time, they get more metal migration at the gas port than smaller gas ports on 16 & 20" barrels. Takes more rounds to get the barrel to settle in. 16 or 20" for me moving forward. (Chrome lined might help)
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
I think that one or two of those will usually out perform the others (Craddock is most frequently considered here). However I don't think that any of those will really disappoint either...but you do have a slightly higher chance of getting a dud with some.

I've got three Wilsons, a WOA, and a Criterion on my rifles that I'm concerned about "MOA or better accuracy" out of, and all deliver. I also have a Proof, but haven't got to the point of testing it yet. I did get a dud Ballistic Advantage...but their replacement has shot well.

I guess cost vs expectations vs your intended role for the rifle should be considered.

I have a factory FN DMR II that is ~1.25 MOA with 64gr Speer Gold Dot...and it kills everything I need it to out to 250.
 
Of your list I’ve only owned Centurion and Rainier Arms ultra match and still have a 308 Ultra Match. In terms of reliability and accuracy and I don’t or won’t split the two up, I would built out with a Centurion Arms barrel. That’s just my own personal hands on experience. However, those that know far more than me say really good things about Proof Research and Criterion, but I would say from the people I trust, they would opt for a Proof. The cost ain’t no joke and for me I am a believer in “Buy once cry once.”, and when it comes to barrels, I will probably buy the barrel that my own capability can best leverage and included with that what I view is worth the price. Maybe the PR is more accurate (or fill in any manufacturer) but if my capability best leverages Criterion or Centurion Arms, then I won’t spend money that while may be cool to say “Oh well I have a ________ barrel on my SPR or precision gun” if I can’t shoot to the barrels capability. That’s just my viewpoint and it may not be the right one for everyone, but it is mine. I would say that at least some years ago I saw some data on Bartlein barrels that wasn’t super impressive and I think that’s the same barrel that the MK12 program used, but that was several years ago. Good luck to you! I hope you tell us what you chose and we can see the final weapon.
PS it may be obvious but I’m not a competition shooter and I will also say that I also tend to support veteran owned companies. I’ve always had a good experience dealing with Monty (his wife was the one who always kept me squared away) but Monty in my purchases always stood behind his products and I never had an issue there, and my builds with his barrels never left me wanting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cold_Bore_88