Does anyone else ponder the narrow range of projectile diameters?

chungus

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
Jan 8, 2022
161
54
Texas
The vast majority of projectiles shooters use fall between .22 and .30 - a range of just 8 hundredths of an inch. Sure people use .17s and 50 cal but I bet over 95% of rifles fall between 22 & 30.

I am sure this range was determined based on trial and error over the evolution of rifles I just find it kind of fascinating that there is such a small range that works. Looking at competition shooters most are using between .243 & .264 a range of 2 hundredths of an inch. It is pretty wild how well we have narrowed down what is best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emerson0311
Very interesting. I was thinking of something along the same lines with barrel length. Short barrel = low velocity , longer = faster. What happens at the extreme ? How about a 50" barrel, 100", 50ft.? At what point is maximum achieved ? Lets us a standard .223 for reference.
 
No, not really. 150 years ago, the only real way to increase lethality- given the limitations of black powder- was to increase bore diameter. With pretty much everything humming along at a rather sedate velocity, even the big magnums were tolerable to shoot. But, once smokeless powder came on to the seen, velocities skyrocketed and more could be done with less. But as muzzle velocities increase, so does recoil. Most people will tell you that a 50 BMG is more fun to let others shoot, than to shoot yourself. A big bore rifle, retaining smokeless muzzle velocities is either a dread to shoot, a drag to carry, or both. There’s not many people going out and shooting 577 TRex for fun. And those that are, have a twisted definition of fun.

A 30 cal smokeless gun surpasses all but the biggest BP thumpers. And to attest to that; Walter “Karamojo” Bell killed 800 elephants (out of a total of 1,011) with a 7x57 Mauser.