• Thanks to everyone who joined The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway!

    We'll be announcing the winner early next week, keep an eye out!

    See the contest

Israel/iran

Yes , serbia also barely had an airforce something liek 10 mig 29s and there were 500-800 NATO planes flying sorties , but the point is it could not be busted , and an airbase is different than missile base as planes still need runways , and them flying those 10-15 migs against NATO force was not much point

The most impresive Iranian missile base is like US concept where missiles are fired under cover trough hidden and protected shafts , and if one gets blown next one can be used

View attachment 8710782

View attachment 8710788

Simple reason why US getting involved it not quite as risk free as folks think , there are 40,000 to 50,000 US military personnel stationed in the Middle East , many much closer than Israel , also unlike Israel those bases do not have layers of AD and air raid shelters like Israel has , so if all out shooting starts this could dicy real fast. There are many more short to medium range missiles than long range ones they are lobbing at israel. Ground invasion of Iran is more or less out of the question terrain is not like Iraq.
Technical superiority goes right down to zero when your magazine is empty (AD missiles used up at vociferous rates by Israel and Ukraine far in excess of yearly production.)

View attachment 8710801
My point was aimed directly at you making it sound like the USAF went through some great effort to Bunker bust Slatina, when that just isn't the case.
 
I guess.......
you can trap them there, until it's time to finish them off.
At least you know they aren't going anywhere.
someone should drop a speaker down a vent shaft... start playing some Wet Ass P**Y, that'll make em surrender (endless loop)
The sound of constant piggies would make an ideal music to annoy the fuck out of em them filthy muzzies.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NoDopes
No bunker buster needed.

Just place an order with that nifty earthquake generator down in Antarctica and it will be proven that no facility can be built deep enough to avoid destruction.

Then again, the MIC would not like for this conflict to end so early. Too much money on the table to be made right now.

Wait, What? Lizzo is doing a concert in Antarctica right now?

Sirhr
 
That's technically not true. They do have a bomb that could do it.

Quite a few, in fact.... Underground testing was never banned...

But I doubt they will first-use. That would be a bad, bad move for their future and ability to leverage their historical victim status.

Now if Iran does something NBC tonight... But they have been bloviating every day on TV. Well, on the TV that's left after the IDF put a smart bomb on the TV studio ;-)

Sirhr
 
Human shields?



More likely it's too dangerous to move civilian aircraft in the airspace right now.

Last thing we need is a planeload of US Citizens winged by an Iranian missile.... Lindsey Graham would be seen fapping on National TV over that one...

If I were an American in Israel right now, I'd be much happier in a bunker or out on some Kibbutz watching the show through binoculars.

Sirhr
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Phish
Well, it pretty much says everyone who rejects the son is condemned, and anyone who accepts his primacy is saved.

You don't have to "destroy" it. You just have to collapse all the entrances and exits under enough rock, and hit anything that comes to try and dig the out. Such are the benefits of total air superiority.
The IDF has been doing quite well so far let them have at it and maybe it keeps our hands clean
 
  • Like
Reactions: kmckinnon
Yes , serbia also barely had an airforce something like 10-15 mig 29s and there were 500-800 NATO planes flying sorties , but the point is it could not be busted , and an airbase is different than missile base as planes still need runways , and them flying those 10-15 migs against NATO force was not much point

The most impresive Iranian missile base is like US concept where missiles are fired under cover trough hidden and protected shafts , and if one gets blown next one can be used .

Like said underground bases have good track record in withstanding bombardment and folks that build them generaly planed for them being attacked so exits are designed for that.

View attachment 8710782

View attachment 8710788

Simple reason why US getting involved it not quite as risk free as folks think , there are 40,000 to 50,000 US military personnel stationed in the Middle East , many much closer than Israel , also unlike Israel those bases do not have layers of AD and air raid shelters like Israel has , so if all out shooting starts this could get dicy real fast. There are many more short to medium range missiles than long range ones they are lobbing at israel , also shit load of drones that were so far not used en masse. Ground invasion of Iran is more or less out of the question terrain is not like Iraq.
Technical superiority goes right down to zero when your magazine is empty (AD missiles used up at vociferous rates by Israel and Ukraine far in excess of yearly production.)

View attachment 8710801

Also remember that in the former Yugoslavia, the Clinton Admin put something like a 30,000 foot floor on aircover. Maybe it was only 10K. I can't recall the actual number. But they had a hard deck for US operations so another plane didn't get shot down. Anyone else remember Scott O'Grady and the hubbub that caused?

So to avoid that, planes could not operate at altitudes that would have let them make precision strikes. And 'may' have had all their operations limited. I don't know about that. Maybe someone can chime in. Clinton did NOT want to lose any more aircraft.

Sirhr
 
Also remember that in the former Yugoslavia, the Clinton Admin put something like a 30,000 foot floor on aircover. Maybe it was only 10K. I can't recall the actual number. But they had a hard deck for US operations so another plane didn't get shot down. Anyone else remember Scott O'Grady and the hubbub that caused?

So to avoid that, planes could not operate at altitudes that would have let them make precision strikes. And 'may' have had all their operations limited. I don't know about that. Maybe someone can chime in. Clinton did NOT want to lose any more aircraft.

Sirhr
Infrared weapons (IR) could render the investment in radar-defeating measures pointless, but so far the missiles do not have the altitude to deal with a fighter-bomber dropping a laser-guided bomb from 15,000 feet, or the range to deal with one launching a stand-off missile from 40 miles. The seekers are not effective over the wide field of view and long distance they would need to search for such a high-altitude shot. However, infrared weapons are demonstrably more survivable, and did a good job of keeping NATO aircraft above 10,000 feet over both provinces of the Balkans. Two NATO aircraft losses over Bosnia—a French Mirage 2000D in 1995 and a British Harrier GR7 in 1994—were attributable to low-altitude operations. Unsurprisingly, with the hard deck raised to 15,000 feet in 1999, these losses never materialized. In 1999, the Yugoslavs reportedly had only 17 tracked Strela-10 (SAM-13) launchers, and only 75 shoulder-fired Iglas (SAM-16/18s). They had a huge number of Strela-2Ms (SAM-7s), but those weapons are notoriously easy to deceive with flares. Worse, most of these missiles were years past their warranty expirations, and the complicated seekers on IR-guided weapons are not endlessly shelf-stable.

In 1999, NATO used stealth bombers and modern electronics from altitudes at which the Yugoslavs were outmatched, and managed to destroy a predictably small quantity of armor and artillery. The Yugoslavs fought back with technology that the North Vietnamese had used against the Linebacker II campaign of 1972. The Yugoslavs shot off 700 missiles, and downed two aircraft.

 
Let me put on my tinfoil hat.

The Iranians secretly bought a nuke from Dim Dung Hill and have it smuggled into Tel Aviv or Jerusalem.



Or Pakistan. Pakistan has already said that they would respond on Iran's behalf.

And they have a lot less to lose than Kim Jong Nutball.

Sirhr
 
More likely it's too dangerous to move civilian aircraft in the airspace right now.

Last thing we need is a planeload of US Citizens winged by an Iranian missile.... Lindsey Graham would be seen fapping on National TV over that one...

If I were an American in Israel right now, I'd be much happier in a bunker or out on some Kibbutz watching the show through binoculars.

Sirhr
Fights can fly in and foreigners can fly out , its purely to keep israelis inside.

 
Let me guess... another Giant F35 is going to be shot down?

We'll be swimming in rivers of our own blood?

Elvis is alive and working at a carwash in Dayton, OH?

Inquiring minds want to know. Because every time those Mullah-types threaten the end of the world, they end up looking like this...


View attachment 8710740

Smoke 'em if you got 'em!
Sirhr
even a dirty bomb could have large and long term consequences, and shooting it down above tel aviv isn't necessarily going to make it ineffective.
 
even a dirty bomb could have large and long term consequences, and shooting it down above tel aviv isn't necessarily going to make it ineffective.

Yeah... had not thought of that.

If you have access to enough radioactive material... (and they do) that would probably be a pretty expedient and simple thing to pull off.

Let's hope they don't try it! Because that would be really, really bad at every level.

But in the throes of disaster, governments do stupid things. Especially crazy theocratic ones that regard a return to the 9th Century as a net positive.

Sirhr
 

Israel: We Are Hitting Fordow, With or Without U.S., Bunker-Busters​

The site, 90 meters (295 feet) underground, houses thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium. Israel’s conventional munitions can’t reach that deep, and it would take the US joining the fight to knock it out from the air.
View attachment 8710684

Didn’t a hacker destroy one facility a while back just over reving the equipment?
 
Didn’t a hacker destroy one facility a while back just over reving the equipment?

Stuxnet virus... brilliant operation. IIRC used a printer shipped from France to introduce a virus into the centrifuges that caused them to destroy themselves.

A very creative op!


Sirhr
 
Can you appreciate the exquisite twisted beauty of how this is all playing out.

-3500 years ago the Israelites crossed the Jordan River and slaughtered every living thing. Took the land. You could call it a holocaust. Biblical history

-Roll forward +/- 3500 years and a bunch of whack job Germans tried to exterminate them, and made a big dent in their population. Holocaust. Modern history

-However Israel came into possession of the land they have, stole it, Balfour'd it, gifted by the Almighty, etc, they just had to have THAT piece of land, knowing they'd be surrounded by enemies, and rudely displaced a couple hundred thousand people. Insanity Mod History

-Roll forward a mere 30 years, the Shah is out, the Zealots who are mandated by their religion to destroy Israel, are in and looking to fulfil the prophecy. Insanity Mod History.

You cant make this shit up. I just hope Trump keeps us out of it.
 
All this procrastination and worry about blowing up thier nuke facilities.

WTF let those areas glow dimly for a thousand years with radiation thier own plants.

For the life of me can't see why anyone cares? Far enough away from anything we GAF about to be Inconciquential.

Hopefully thier goat brothels are far enough away to not be damaged. I don't want to stir things up.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Big Phish
Big difference between defensive interceptor AA missile debris and an aimed bunker buster dropped from an american military plane over a sovereign country
Is it?

A U.S. boat taking direct action against an Iranian ballistic missile aimed at Israel.
Not self defense of US assets or US Mil members.

While I agree that a US plane over their airspace would be a bigger deal, the US intercepting Iranian missiles while possibly still over Iranian airspace is not trivial. I guess it boils down to a matter of degree and trying to determine where that ever-elusive line is.

IF any of this is even accurate........
Per sirhmechanic above, they could easily stage debris from other theaters of operation in efforts to further their narrative.
 
even a dirty bomb could have large and long term consequences, and shooting it down above tel aviv isn't necessarily going to make it ineffective.
Or one set off by pre-positioned teams in any number of US cities…. That’s my biggest concern right now.

And re: US air strikes, I’m willing to give Trump some slack for now:

1) This shit has been ongoing for thousands of years, but the blame for where we are rests squarely on Jimmy Carter’s shoulders. If he’d been a real leader, he’d have nipped this shit in the bud. Trump’s just stepping up to finally put an end to the nonsense, and remove the threat Iran has posed for 40+ years.
2) Payback for the Embassy seizure…about fucking time.
3) We haven’t (officially) done anything yet for fuck’s sake...let’s see how this plays out.
4) Trump doesn’t strike me as a NeoCon or a MIC supporter (may be his undoing as a matter of fact).
5) If we do strike, I think Trump’s enough of an outside the box thinker to NOT also take on nation building or anything else…hit and leave, none of that bullshit we did in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Of course, the MIC and likely Israel will try their best to drag us into it anyway. 🫤
 
Last edited:
Fuck Graham, Will he be leading the charge?

Could we drop him on Qum?

(Note to all Glowies... this is satire. This is not an actual serious call to drop Lindsay Graham on Iran. I do not have the means or opportunity to drop him on Iran. Nor do I actually advocate this at any level. Besides, even we aren't going to be that cruel to the Iranians!)

Sirhr
 
Some idiots already posted that shit earlier in this thread.
For some different material

IMG_4320.jpeg


IMG_4321.jpeg
 
Is it?

A U.S. boat taking direct action against an Iranian ballistic missile aimed at Israel.
Not self defense of US assets or US Mil members.

While I agree that a US plane over their airspace would be a bigger deal, the US intercepting Iranian missiles while possibly still over Iranian airspace is not trivial. I guess it boils down to a matter of degree and trying to determine where that ever-elusive line is.

IF any of this is even accurate........
Per sirhmechanic above, they could easily stage debris from other theaters of operation in efforts to further their narrative.
Just a couple years or so we did exactly that, from ships and aircraft we shot down at least half of the incoming missiles. We even bragged about it. No secret.
 
They should have been annihilated during OIF when they were supplying/training AQ to kill Americans. Bush was a pussy faggot puppet.

Its one of the reasons you know OIF was about money not WMDS/regional security. Iran killing Americans and they did nothing about it, because the money spigot was flowing. I lost good buddies to IRCG training and weapons.

Waiting 20 years to do something about it is a joke. Kill em, fuck who cares. I just don't want to see more dead Americans.

I spent most of 2004 over there doing the USMC infantry gig. I have no love for any of them. I don’t even want to contemplate the number of dudes I knew who aren’t here anymore or who aren’t in one piece.

This also leads me to be very reluctant to commit ground forces to any conflict.

We should draft a Constitutional Amendment requiring the adult relatives out to at least 2nd cousins of all Congress Critters, President Vice President and cabinet members to be drafted immediately upon authorization to embark on any direct military action. Furthermore require the sons etc of these turds to serve in frontline combat units in a combat arms MOS. If it’s so damned vital to send US troops then send your kids too politicians. Otherwise get fucked.
 
Just a couple years or so we did exactly that, from ships and aircraft we shot down at least half of the incoming missiles. We even bragged about it. No secret.
I remember.
Never said or insinuated otherwise.

My only point in the post was that I had a difference of opinion with sloporsche regarding the degree of our involvement versus US planes over Iran. So.... I tried to frame the context of my reply accordingly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sloporsche
Could we drop him on Qum?

(Note to all Glowies... this is satire. This is not an actual serious call to drop Lindsay Graham on Iran. I do not have the means or opportunity to drop him on Iran. Nor do I actually advocate this at any level. Besides, even we aren't going to be that cruel to the Iranians!)

Sirhr
When Graham does a real life imitation of Slim Pickens riding a nuclear bomb out of a bomber onto enemy territory make sure to get a video of it and post it on Youtube for the world and myself to see. Until then he needs to STFU about sending American soldiers to free and create liberty and democracy in a foreign country. Obviously he hasn't studied history to see how that's turned out in the past for the U.S. .
 
They're in the middle of the open ocean and both ships are the size of a building, visibility has to be like 5-10miles out there, GPS is no excuse.

Lots of incompetent mariners out there operating ships maintained to questionable standards flying flags of convenience. It’s a wonder there aren’t more navigation related accidents.
 
When Graham does a real life imitation of Slim Pickens riding a nuclear bomb out of a bomber onto enemy territory make sure to get a video of it and post it on Youtube for the world and myself to see. Until then he needs to STFU about sending American soldiers to free and create liberty and democracy in a foreign country. Obviously he hasn't studied history to see how that's turned out in the past for the U.S. .

Despite their mouthing slogans like “Thank you for your service”’endlessly… a lot of politicians regard the military (and other uniformed services) as little more than dogs or cattle… who are not smart enough or valuable enough to be political leaders (or educated at Harvard) like they were.

I think that is one very big difference with Trump. He may be a billionaire, but he has always had “working class” attitudes. He has also been broke a couple of times… when empires collapsed. He genuinely empathizes with the man on the street whose kids end up as the guys at the sharp end of the spear.

Where many others regard them as little more than disposable cannon fodder or pawns to be sacrificed for their great careers as statesmen.

Just an impression…

Sirhr