well here is my reaction to this video, on another forum:
basically the Youtuber in question is an idiot, and is either farming for engagement, a weenie, or both, and Definitely ignorant of his gear.
First off, the gun did NOT "Blow up", the pressure bearing parts of the gun remained intact when he had a case failure that lead to the side of the stock splitting off and the mag exiting, oh and his extractor also departed the bolt. and all three of these "failures" are to be expected when high-pressure gas vents into spaces not normally subjected to them. nor did any of them apparently leave at a speed to cause real concern.
My read of this is the rifle performed as it should have and by venting the gas into the mag-well saved him from grievous injury at the hands of a faulty round. And in no way was the extractor on the rifle at fault for, or a contributing factor in, the failure. the extractor (that metal piece he found blown loose and couldn't identify btw) on the 77/22-17 rifles is a spring-loaded claw NOT the Mauser-style one of the standard centerfire 77s, so that it WILL safely snap over the rim of a single-loaded round.
That Ruger action protected the shooter by directing the gas flow down, through the magazine channel
This is my Ruger bolt, and the ports on the bottom of the bolt direct gas down.
the left side of the bolt sleeve blocks gas coming down the left receiver rail cutout.
btw, the above is a centerfire M77 bolt, on the 77/22 and 77/17 the bolt is a rear-locking design and locking lugs block the left raceway even more so.
he said his magazine was faulty, not really, there's a reason why instructions for how to properly tension Ruger Rotary mags are available on net and i believe included in all the owner's manuals for rifles that use them, anytime you strip one to clean it, you HAVE to re-tension it, and there's no guarantee that a given mag was properly tensioned from the factory (every 10/22 devotee i've met strips and re-tensions every factory new mag they get). so instead of doing what is a basic maintenance action for his gun, he again says that the issue may have contributed to the failure...
and i'll admit i'm being a bit of a pedant here, and maybe making a poor assumption based on outdated info, but. He lost me somewhat early when he started talking like the Hornady and Winchester ammo weren't likely a case of "same ammo different box". it's been kind of an obvious to anyone with a brain stem open secret that most of the 17 rimfire ammo was coming from either a singular or maybe two production plant(s) with only the tip of the V-max bullets being different, if that, between Hornady, Winchester, Remington, or Federal.
Sometimes I think I'm too much of an "Autistic gun crank".