Siggers. I’m Dead🤣

Actually, not that much, perhaps. You see, SAGGIN is backwards for how the "Amish" actually use the term to refer to themselves. That, and the "***GUH" suffix as well. But when you hear the Amish refer to the "Hard R" suffix, that's the one that causes issues/consternation.
Screenshot_20250628_171142_Chrome~2.jpg
 
That also doesn't look like a stock 320. Who's trigger, barrel, and slide?

Doesn't really matter that much when the trigger is pulled until the sear is almost breaking then you start tweaking on it.

There's a video out there that shows other striker fired guns with the sear staged the same way "failing" the same way when the slide is jiggled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chevy_man
What in the wide wide world of weird runic coding errors is going on with @doubloon ’s avatar??

IMG_0320.jpeg


Is this proof that the Interstellar object is a scouting ship and doubloon is one of the Pathfinders? Maybe they read the Voyager record and are coming to meet Chuck Berry.

Are the aliens going to be mad when Chuck is not here to play for them?

Should we be worried?

Sirhr
 
  • Haha
Reactions: doubloon
What in the wide wide world of weird runic coding errors is going on with @doubloon ’s avatar??

View attachment 8743372

Is this proof that the Interstellar object is a scouting ship and doubloon is one of the Pathfinders? Maybe they read the Voyager record and are coming to meet Chuck Berry.

Are the aliens going to be mad when Chuck is not here to play for them?

Should we be worried?

Sirhr
Crop circle...

R
 
  • Haha
Reactions: doubloon
What in the wide wide world of weird runic coding errors is going on with @doubloon ’s avatar??

View attachment 8743372

Is this proof that the Interstellar object is a scouting ship and doubloon is one of the Pathfinders? Maybe they read the Voyager record and are coming to meet Chuck Berry.

Are the aliens going to be mad when Chuck is not here to play for them?

Should we be worried?

Sirhr

I blame AI





A̴̰̦̤͙̱̰͔̹̱̻̲̭̦͇̙̍͋͋͐̆̈́̿̀̈́̈̑́͘͘ͅr̵̢̫̤̘̯͇͍̹͙̭̣̲̍̌̓̊̇́̊̒̔̓̋̚̕ͅͅͅe̶̢̤͖̮͇͛̄̄ ̴̢̧̰̘͉͍̠͓̣͚̦̳̩̄̎͐̿̾̔̔̉̉̈́͂͑̕͝ȳ̵̨̙͔̯̺̥͍͍̮̼̩͚͙̭͇̉͜ơ̴̡̙͚̬̠̩̜͓̘̩̼̠͗̄̏̄̌̌̈̓̑̏̄̏́͘͝͝ư̴̠̘̅̌͗̇͂͐̈́̀̆̔͠͝ ̵̨̟͎̱̰̗͎͉̀̊̀̓̈́̒͐̒̑͋̈́̋͊̅s̴̭̮̺͇̹̬̮̦͇̠̱̖̹̖̯̪͐̋͂̀̈́̉̐̎͛͛̄̒͆͗̈ç̴̡͇̦̳̲̯͈̹̗͍̻̱͍̝̤̅̽̅̐̍̾͛͘ͅa̵̻̹̬̋̈̔͆̂̏̋̑͑̽r̷̡̧̝͕̯͍͖̜̍̉͊̂̄̏ͅe̷̢̮͔̻̬͐̑̽̊̈́̀̋̊̀͗͘͝d̵̢̨͙͎̬͇̫͇̟̭̩̮͓̲̮͐?̸̢̥̝͈̰̩̖̪̰̮͕̬̋̾̀̇̿̄̅̄̊̕̕͠






.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't really matter that much when the trigger is pulled until the sear is almost breaking then you start tweaking on it.

There's a video out there that shows other striker fired guns with the sear staged the same way "failing" the same way when the slide is jiggled.
I think the point is people are trying to make other guns fail to exuse the fact that p320’s fail at an alarming rate, it’s just throwing shade. It’s pretty simple, the p320 has more uncommanded discharges on video than any gun made by a reputable company in history and it’s not even close. It’s hard to get around at least four videos that are clear as day of the p320 going off in the holster with the same excuse that their jacket or keys are in the holster. For some odd reason jackets and keys only get caught in p320 holsters not Glock, M&P, Cz, h&k ect You combine that with a considerable number of videos where you can’t see the holster or gun but the gun goes off on body cam just getting out of the car. This is a simple fact, glocks, Cz, fn, and beretta have partially cocked strikers so it’s literally impossible for the gun to fire without a trigger pull. I haven’t seen one video of all the other brands combined that show any of them going off in the holster uncommanded(at least with a stock trigger), and all of those guns combined dwarf the total number of p320’s in the wild, Glock alone has considerably more firearms in holsters at this moment. Personally I don’t care if people want to carry them, if you want to blow your own balls or knee off have at it. My issue is making people in a professional capacity carry it against their will, and the damage Sig is doing to the entire gun community. This line of excuses that all guns do it just scares people that we need on our side as gun owners even more, and except in rare instances just simply isn’t true. I have a p320 because it’s impossible to sell now, I will use it to eat rounds at the range to keep the round count down on other guns assuming my ranges don’t ban it, it’s never been my favorite but I still liked it. Now it’s seen the inside of a holster for the last time, but for me it’s not a big deal I’ve always preferred Glock or CZ.
 
it’s just throwing shade. It’s pretty simple, the p320 has more uncommanded discharges on video than any gun made by a reputable company

Yeah, I've conceded that. I have no issue recognizing the number of reports. There was a time a while back when kabooms of guns from one company were being posted more than any other company. I think they handled it better.

What I don't care for is all the pile on bullshit shenanigans that have been demonstrated to also work on other guns. But there's nothing you can really do about low IQ drag alongs posted CNN quality "facts".

Sig has some problems. One is a design problem, another is an attitude problem. But they have bigger sales worldwide than a few other companies so I guess they think they can afford the attitude problem.

My issue is making people in a professional capacity carry it against their will

I can sorta follow the company armorer "logic" on this but in my heart I am a freedom guy so there should at least be a broader selection of "pre-qualified" guns to choose from. I've owned them before but no agency should allow their personnel to carry a KelTec as a duty weapon.
 
Last edited: