• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

PortaJohn

It is literally defined as a disorder in the DSM V. Not sure why this is controversial.

I'm gonna jump in here and say, have you looked at how large the DSM has grown to be?

They literally have made up a disorder for fucking everything.

No disorder?
No treatment.
No treatment? No $$$$$.

Disorder? Yes.
Yes = treatment.
Treatment = $$$$$$$$

That's how simple the DSM-V is.
 
I'm gonna jump in here and say, have you looked at how large the DSM has grown to be?

They literally have made up a disorder for fucking everything.

No disorder?
No treatment.
No treatment? No $$$$$.

Disorder? Yes.
Yes = treatment.
Treatment = $$$$$$$$

That's how simple the DSM-V is.
That's actually not necessarily true. What you are saying is true for a diagnosis, but not a disorder. For example, transgenderism used to be classified as a disorder, which it is, but was reclassified as a dysphoria. Being a dysphoria allows for $$$$$$$ for treatment without the "stigma" of having a disorder. Likewise, dislexia is considered a disability, and can get $$$$$, but is not a disorder.

Sociopathy, psychopathy etc are disorders, as is pedophilia. It isn't a euphemism, just a categorization.

In any case, I was simply trying to use the correct word. Molesting is a crime, pedophilia is a disorder. Most pedophiles, apparently, are able to constrain themselves. Or so the research says. Whatever the case, if anybody took any of my statements to be a defense of pedophilia, then I apologize. They were not.
 
So - on todays $1.9T stimulus -

It was exactly equivalent to taking $8610.20 from every person that actually pays taxes in the US.

At gunpoint - never forget that part. So you just worked 14 weeks for everyone else if you make the average US income.

That assumes 220 million taxpayers. I doubt that the number of people who are actually paying the freight in this country exceeds 150 or 160 million. By paying the freight, I mean net. Not EIC filers or other net leaches after bennies are deducted.
 
That assumes 220 million taxpayers. I doubt that the number of people who are actually paying the freight in this country exceeds 150 or 160 million. By paying the freight, I mean net. Not EIC filers or other net leaches after bennies are deducted.
Net it is way lower than that, I imagine. Probably no more than 20%. Maybe less.
 
That's actually not necessarily true. What you are saying is true for a diagnosis, but not a disorder. For example, transgenderism used to be classified as a disorder, which it is, but was reclassified as a dysphoria. Being a dysphoria allows for $$$$$$$ for treatment without the "stigma" of having a disorder. Likewise, dislexia is considered a disability, and can get $$$$$, but is not a disorder.

Sociopathy, psychopathy etc are disorders, as is pedophilia. It isn't a euphemism, just a categorization.

In any case, I was simply trying to use the correct word. Molesting is a crime, pedophilia is a disorder. Most pedophiles, apparently, are able to constrain themselves. Or so the research says. Whatever the case, if anybody took any of my statements to be a defense of pedophilia, then I apologize. They were not.
whatcha think about little girls in "beauty pageants" and people that watch them?
 
SKFg5xtq.jpeg
 
whatcha think about little girls in "beauty pageants" and people that watch them?
I think they are fucking weirdos, though I can't say I have had the displeasure of actually meeting a person like that.

If you are asking me if I think they are pedophiles, I have no idea. It is a subculture I know nothing about. It surely wouldn't surprise me, though I have always thought of it more as a group of women trying to grab on to some fantasy of a youth they never enjoyed themselves.
 
Last edited:
Think the people that put their kids into that are some variation of Münchhausen by proxy, not excusing it but definitely something wrong there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandhog308
Think the people that put their kids into that are some variation of Münchhausen by proxy, not excusing it but definitely something wrong there.
i can't say all of them, but i watched a show that i could only interpret as a mom exploiting her daughter and pimping her out. they don't pose like kids and they don't wear kid clothes. they dress them up like call girls.
i can see how this could be seen as the mother enjoying her daughter's attention by proxy. the mothers are rarely beautiful.
 
I watched the first two...
What a sick bastard. He was groping the girl in the red dress. Kept his hand on her side and was moving his fingers the whole time.

Look at 4:25, he covers her whole breast with the right hand - the poor girl cringed..He often would put his hand on the right upper arm so he could try to touch their side breast - if you slow it down and go to full screen you can see his fingers moving pressing down or in (ie. at 6:09). The girl Jess, that didn't pull away, got her own photo while her father said "Dad is going to stay pretty close"; 7:45 - same things with another girl, 9:06-9:10 he's touching half her upper right breast and even upper on the left, the girl in gray @ 11:23 actually catches on to his trick and keeps moving her right arm farther and farther away from her chest..
He did the same thing to this adult female, although the other woman complained about the kiss

and the protective grandfather move by Sessions:
 
Last edited:

Look at 4:25, he covers her whole breast with the right hand - the poor girl cringed..He often would put his hand on the right upper arm so he could try to touch their side breast - if you slow it down and go to full screen you can see his fingers moving pressing down or in (ie. at 6:09). The girl Jess, that didn't pull away, got her own photo while her father said "Dad is going to stay pretty close"; 7:45 - same things with another girl, 9:06-9:10 he's touching half her upper right breast and even upper on the left, the girl in gray @ 11:23 actually catches on to his trick and keeps moving her right arm farther and farther away from her chest..
He did the same thing to this adult female, although she complained about the kiss

and the protective grandfather move by Sessions:

Sorry I cant watch that shit. My step daughter was raped by her biological father when she was 9. Then he tried to drown her afterwards.

Doc
 


Gotta admit, this might not be the best representation for responsible gun ownership and use :unsure: (I believe she's a mother of four kids)


How many times do we have to repeat that appeasing the fucking leftists gains us NOTHING. They don't give a shit how we store our guns, they will ALWAYS find something wrong with it.

In any case, you neither know nor are qualified to judge Boebert's home situation and firearm storage security.
 
How many times do we have to repeat that appeasing the fucking leftists gains us NOTHING. They don't give a shit how we store our guns, they will ALWAYS find something wrong with it.

In any case, you neither know nor are qualified to judge Boebert's home situation and firearm storage security.

Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Choid
Hes got 34 years left. I got thrown out of the trial for losing my shit. He will be 78 when he gets out. No parole chance either.

Doc
One of the reasons I somewhat believe the narrative that tons of the people at the top of the food chain are sexual predators is the stories women tell me at work. (I work in a place where these types of stories are going to get told due to the role I am in).

Their stories either star a man who is a loner and didn’t get out much - or it’s the powerful family patriarch. Or drugs/alchohol. Or two of the above.

People that fancy themselves patriarchs are a key source of political ambition and/or corporate leadership.
 
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.

Let's just assume for a second that you know her motivations for putting those rifles and pistols on the shelf behind her. So the fuck what? It's her home to do as she pleases and not your home to dictate what's right or wrong.

The second sentence in your post above is truly the height of irony.
 
That seems like too short of a sentence :mad:
He got 45 years total. Nowhere even close to being enough. This was after I spent almost 80k in lawyers trying to get custody of the children. We think he also tried to drown my youngest because he was afraid of the bathtub for so long he would not take baths and my wife had to be in there to shower him, but we could never prove anything.

Doc
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote
The room itself could be secure. Heavy steel door, or a vault door or just locking etc.

Or, perhaps they are simply put up in the safe each day.

Hardly know the circumstances, but by all means...call it out lol.
 
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.


I remember when "our community" used to display firearms in glass front beautiful furniture as a source of pride in the home.

Now we hide them in blocks of steel in shame.

Granted I understand the safety issue but the question should be......How did we survive than without people breaking in to our houses and stealing our shit or how come we didnt worry about every depressed person coming along and wanting to use our shit to kill themselves?

Sounds like we got a society problem not a gun problem.
 
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
It's not bullshit. It's her right. We are past the point of appeasing the communist tools. Double down on stupidity? Really? We are past the point of no return. We are not going to win them over. If it "Triggers" the left them so be it. They need it shoved up their asses on a daily basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
Didn’t some Dems have pics of Mao, Che, or Pol Pot displayed during Zoom meetings or interviews? Strange those don’t get the same level of anger.


Actually it was the R chick running for senate in Georgia that lost to a soy boy.

UniParty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: E. Bryant
Art and pictures of Mao aren't the same thing. And she didn't lose to the soy boy, she lost to the preacher. Any other questions?
Actually it was the R chick running for senate in Georgia that lost to a soy boy.

UniParty.
 
I remember when "our community" used to display firearms in glass front beautiful furniture as a source of pride in the home.

Now we hide them in blocks of steel in shame.

Granted I understand the safety issue but the question should be......How did we survive than without people breaking in to our houses and stealing our shit or how come we didnt worry about every depressed person coming along and wanting to use our shit to kill themselves?

Sounds like we got a society problem not a gun problem.

giphy.gif
 
How is it not the same? Buying a $3k painting of a Communist dictator for display in your home is a political statement. Making sure it’s displayed during an interview is also a political statement. Displaying a weapon while engaging with political opponents is also a statement.
 
I'm fine with displaying either. All I am saying is that having a Warhol piece displayed is not the same thing as supporting Mao or communism. They are pieces of art, not political statements.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Keel Haul
I'm fine with displaying either. All I am saying is that having a Warhol piece displayed is not the same thing as supporting Mao or communism. They are pieces of art, not political statements.
NOTHING means nothing. Everything you see, means something. The fact that you don't see it isn't a character flaws at all. You can't help it that you are blind.
 
I don't know what to tell you guys. If you have Warhol Cambell's Soup cans up, it doesn't mean that you like Campbell's Soup. If you have his electric chair silkscreens up, it doesn't mean you like the death penalty. Same with his work with guns in it. Doesn't mean you are pro gun. Art isn't always about the subject of the piece, it is often much deeper than that. I realize that I, apparently, have run in different circles from you all in my life, so I am not surprised to see people think that having a Warhol Mao makes you a commie on here.
 
I don't know what to tell you guys. If you have Warhol Cambell's Soup cans up, it doesn't mean that you like Campbell's Soup. If you have his electric chair silkscreens up, it doesn't mean you like the death penalty. Same with his work with guns in it. Doesn't mean you are pro gun. Art isn't always about the subject of the piece, it is often much deeper than that. I realize that I, apparently, have run in different circles from you all in my life, so I am not surprised to see people think that having a Warhol Mao makes you a commie on here.

I have a confederate battle flag hanging in my living room. Is that art?