• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Gunsmithing Time to Update Rifling Methods?

THEIS

Hi, Sincerely
Banned !
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Hi,

    Time for industry to update its' rifling method manuals?
    Testing will determine :)

    Not cut rifled
    Not button rifled
    Not hammer forged

    No heat, no friction and no stresses induced.

    20210615_121001.jpg
    20210615_121040.jpg
    20210615_130030.jpg


    Sincerely,
    Theis
     
    So is this the new secret sauce for the next generation Hoplite Rifles perchance?
     
    Comments on the YT page even say it can do gain twist. Pretty darn cool.
     
    Entering new territory in barrel production for sure. I've heard of people experimenting with EDM to make barrels, but never heard any results from those experiments. ECM/PECM is a different take on machining with electricity. Even though I'm new here, I've been lurking for a while. I remember a thread where Theis expressed some interest in PECM. Around that time I was reading up on new machining tech so that little tidbit stuck with me. If ECM lives up to the marketing hype, it will probably replace all other barrel making methods but the mass produced hammer forged barrels. How's the surface finish on those barrels?
     
    Again very interesting,
    Looking forward to seeing how they perform.
     
    I'll have to watch that video later when I get the time, but there are some DIY'ers rifling their barrels at home with electro-chemical techniques. Nothing precision by our standards (at least I don't think). That being said, there were 1 minute 1903's in the ww1 era, so maybe it's not that hard.

    I can't wait to see what the professional industry does with it.
     
    I had a barrel done this way once. EFK has been making 'em for decades. They didn't have a keen following as I recall.

    I still like cut rifling.

    But there wasn't anything wrong with the EFK barrel IMO...
     
    Hi,

    Ummm, that one is complicated to be honest.

    The length of the cathode could be a hinderance of "transitioning". We will cross that road once these initial testing are completed.

    Sincerely,
    Theis
    Do you need someone to shoot them out haha?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jefe's Dope
    Curious what the end goal is? Cost? Accuracy? Velocity? All of the above?

    Obviously they will be more expensive at first but curious what you predict for cost if they make it to full production.

    Great to see some out of the box thinking
     
    Should allow more wear resistant/ harder to machine alloys to be utilized for greater barrel life
     
    • Like
    Reactions: MarinePMI
    I guess I wonder about the "inducing stress" remark.

    My understanding:

    If I take a softball made of rubber bands and begin to randomly snip at it, before too long it will no longer be spherical. By doing so I actually removed the tension (stress) that was inherently present in the mass.

    It's been my experience that machining an object with cutting tools behaves much the same way. The classic example that I fall back to is when I was making reactor parts for General Atomic in the mid/late 90's. You toss a slab of 17-4 on a vise and fly cut it, then watch it turn into a banana when the vise is loosened up.

    -Intro here to "stress relieved" or "normalized" materials. This is a heat treat process executed well ahead of the material going inside a machine. If you buy the good stuff, it's far less likely to push around on you. The example I use here is if we take the same ball of rubber and cook it at an appropriate temperature for a known period of time, it's much less likely to morph into another shape after I whittle on it. It may not stay exactly the same coming out of the oven as when it went in, but it will be closer than when the scissors went after it like in my first example.

    The summary here is to begin a job with a material condition appropriate for the desired outcome. Good barrel companies have been doing this for decades. So long as a barrel has a round hole, decent surface finish, and a uniform rate of twist from one end to the other, chances are good it'll print nice groups on paper. We as a shooting community see this all the time.

    C.
     
    I would see the big advantage as more in the materials opportunities it opens up - something along the lines of an inconel inner sleeve, which would directionally last forever, might become viable.

    An additional advantage might be cut-rifle product behavior with less time on the machine. It won’t beat button rifling for process timing, but it’ll be a nice middle ground on cost as well, presumably.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bulletsmith
    Curious what the end goal is? Cost? Accuracy? Velocity? All of the above?

    Obviously they will be more expensive at first but curious what you predict for cost if they make it to full production.

    Great to see some out of the box thinking

    I'm going to take a guess here and say it's for product and "operational" consistency. PECM is being touted as being able to hold very tight tolerances with a very fine surface finish on the finished parts. By operational consistency I mean every barrel produced will be exactly the same; same dimensionally, same surface finish, same cycle times from one part to the next. Many of the current variables inherent in precision rifle barrels produced by traditional methods, theoretically, will get eliminated with PECM. No tooling to wear out, minimal machine set-up times, and greater consistency and accuracy of finished parts is a production scheduler's wet dream. The only thing that would be lacking with this method is quick cycle times.

    I would see the big advantage as more in the materials opportunities it opens up - something along the lines of an inconel inner sleeve, which would directionally last forever, might become viable........
    Any metal that conducts electricity is fair game here
     
    Aermat100 barrels coming right up
    Yeah, maybe not Aermet, but if Hoplite wants to really take advantage of running higher pressures in the actions, I think advances in barrels will be needed, and I imagine this is the goal here. I know the military has been working on this for a long time, and it seems like a hard problem. You also have more options with bigger guns in terms of adding liners and such.
     
    Inconel would be pretty sweet. Curious if there has been much discussion yet on reamer design and how even good carbide reamer will hold up to inconel?
     
    Inconel would be pretty sweet. Curious if there has been much discussion yet on reamer design and how even good carbide reamer will hold up to inconel?
    I imagine the reamers can be considered disposable. How does one drill the blank, I wonder.
     
    I imagine the reamers can be considered disposable. How does one drill the blank, I wonder.
    The blank I'm less concerned about. We just did some 8" holes through inconel last week at work. Tooling life would definitely be short and cycle time would be longer, but drilling could be accomplished on standard gundrilling machines. I'm more thinking of the learning curve (if any) for the guys chambering the barrels.
     
    The blank I'm less concerned about. We just did some 8" holes through inconel last week at work. Tooling life would definitely be short and cycle time would be longer, but drilling could be accomplished on standard gundrilling machines. I'm more thinking of the learning curve (if any) for the guys chambering the barrels.
    I bet with a carbide reamer and the right feed and speed even Inconel would not be a huge issue.
     
    Entering new territory in barrel production for sure. I've heard of people experimenting with EDM to make barrels, but never heard any results from those experiments. ECM/PECM is a different take on machining with electricity. Even though I'm new here, I've been lurking for a while. I remember a thread where Theis expressed some interest in PECM. Around that time I was reading up on new machining tech so that little tidbit stuck with me. If ECM lives up to the marketing hype, it will probably replace all other barrel making methods but the mass produced hammer forged barrels. How's the surface finish on those barrels?
    I don't know how electronic dance music is going to help make barrels, but I guess if it helps morale around the shop....I'm cool with it. 👍🏼


    😏
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: nikonNUT
    John Benjamin in Portland made button-rifled barrels out of 17-4 stainless but it was a bitch on tooling. I'd like to try a 17-4 barrel if they can be consistently produced.
     
    This is neat stuff. What do you hypothesize the benefit may be? Longevity? Repeatability? Accuracy?
    Also curious how you'll perform testing, or rather what tests you will perrform.
     
    I imagine the reamers can be considered disposable. How does one drill the blank, I wonder.
    One probably starts with a thick-wall tube and straightens the bore, or starts with a rod and does plunge-EDM. Drilling a relatively small and deep hole in a relatively hard material with a relatively thin tool is directionally very challenging, when you also need to have a really high feed rate for the rotation speed.
    I bet with a carbide reamer and the right feed and speed even Inconel would not be a huge issue.
    Problem with inconel is that the work-hardening is obscene. You need to take large bites and move slowly, which means both a lot of twist force applied to the reamer and a lot of difficulty clearing chips - there’s not a whole lot of room left for chips once you have enough section area to not fracture the reamer.
    John Benjamin in Portland made button-rifled barrels out of 17-4 stainless but it was a bitch on tooling. I'd like to try a 17-4 barrel if they can be consistently produced.
    17-4 is probably the only high-nickel alloy that can reasonably be button-rifled. If you look at 416R, the nickel content is ~0, and nickel is how you get good high-temperature properties from steels. I expect that 17-7 or 18-8 would be excellent if you could manufacture barrels out of them, but once you have something like ECM you might as well skip past that all the way to the top - the time costs much more than the material.

    I’m not certain whether an inconel 718ish barrel is better than an inconel bore inside a stainless steel barrel. The high temperature properties mean that inconel could be better, but the same geometry of inconel is more flexible than steel when cold due to the slightly reduced modulus of elasticity, which means both that it’ll be whippier and that it’ll expand more under pressure.
     
    I don't know how electronic dance music is going to help make barrels, but I guess if it helps morale around the shop....I'm cool with it. 👍🏼


    😏
    The vibrations maaaaannn!!!!!

    I’m not certain whether an inconel 718ish barrel is better than an inconel bore inside a stainless steel barrel. The high temperature properties mean that inconel could be better, but the same geometry of inconel is more flexible than steel when cold due to the slightly reduced modulus of elasticity, which means both that it’ll be whippier and that it’ll expand more under pressure.
    One thing I'm certain about is an inconel lined barrel will be a lot cheaper for the customers than a solid inconel barrel.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: gnochi
    The vibrations maaaaannn!!!!!


    One thing I'm certain about is an inconel lined barrel will be a lot cheaper for the customers than a solid inconel barrel.
    Yes but even if one I’d paying $750 for a piece of bar stock, if a barrel now lasts 100k rounds instead of a a couple thousand, the upgrade cost is negligible.

    barrels now just about become lifetime purchases
     
    Chamber is done via ECM also.
    I was thinking exactly that as I read down through the thread and hit this one.
    But, I thought- nah, way too much metal to remove. Shows how much I know...:)

    But there ya go. We all know, anything that can be done in the same setup is the way to go.
    Specific to a precision action, with known ring to boltface dimension?

    How it's possible to hold .0001 or less tolerances when "cutting" with an electrolyte is way above my pay grade, tho.
     
    I was thinking exactly that as I read down through the thread and hit this one.
    But, I thought- nah, way too much metal to remove. Shows how much I know...:)

    But there ya go. We all know, anything that can be done in the same setup is the way to go.
    Specific to a precision action, with known ring to boltface dimension?

    How it's possible to hold .0001 or less tolerances when "cutting" with an electrolyte is way above my pay grade, tho.
    Assuming you have a close-fit nonconductive plug (ie, mostly blocked bore and not enlarging the bore), and the right fluid, you might be able to measure the required pumping power as an analogue for rifling clearance.
     
    Hi,

    ECM can get and hold some crazy tolerances.

    Most people know ECM work as a deburring and polishing process; one in which there is no equal. Polishing internal "ports" is more than half of ECM equipment utilization.


    @sinister
    I can spin up 1 of these normal 416R alloy ECM barrels and send over to you. Just let me know what "prefit" action you want it for.

    Sincerely,
    Theis
     
    Last edited:
    I guess I wonder about the "inducing stress" remark.

    My understanding:

    If I take a softball made of rubber bands and begin to randomly snip at it, before too long it will no longer be spherical. By doing so I actually removed the tension (stress) that was inherently present in the mass.

    It's been my experience that machining an object with cutting tools behaves much the same way. The classic example that I fall back to is when I was making reactor parts for General Atomic in the mid/late 90's. You toss a slab of 17-4 on a vise and fly cut it, then watch it turn into a banana when the vise is loosened up.

    -Intro here to "stress relieved" or "normalized" materials. This is a heat treat process executed well ahead of the material going inside a machine. If you buy the good stuff, it's far less likely to push around on you. The example I use here is if we take the same ball of rubber and cook it at an appropriate temperature for a known period of time, it's much less likely to morph into another shape after I whittle on it. It may not stay exactly the same coming out of the oven as when it went in, but it will be closer than when the scissors went after it like in my first example.

    The summary here is to begin a job with a material condition appropriate for the desired outcome. Good barrel companies have been doing this for decades. So long as a barrel has a round hole, decent surface finish, and a uniform rate of twist from one end to the other, chances are good it'll print nice groups on paper. We as a shooting community see this all the time.

    C.
    Amazing you bring this up.. because yesterday and today I had to cut a huge piece of brass to make a part that got lost at a chrome shop.

    And as the stocks weren't available for the size I want, I got over-sized and figured it would be easy to fly cut it down.

    Well no. Cut 1/8" off in several passes and the bar (28" long) bowed up like a banana. This is naval brass, purchased from MSC (Probably chinese shit.)

    I straightened on an arbor press and got it back flat. Then saw cut off another piece... and watched it banana out almost 3/8" over 12".

    Again, straightened on an arbor press. I was thinking that I was taking too-aggressive cuts and work-hardened one surface and caused the bow. Sort of like an English Wheel. Harden one side and it bows the metal into a compound curve.

    This morning, called a buddy at a company in VT where they make the machines that cast stuff like that... to ask him about it. He and I were in school together... he knows his shit! They make the machines to do all kinds of metals in continuous strip casting... and asked his opinion. Which was interesting.

    He said it was definitely stress in the bar. Not from the casting process, but from the rolling process... with the rollers set up just downstream from the strip casting machines. The more aggressively they roll... the more stresses that get introduced to the bars. The more they 'banana' when machined. Back a bunch of years ago, most mills ran many rollers to gradually shape the final bar. Might be as many as 10 rollers. These days, the 'cut rate' mills in, shall we say, certain countries that undercut American Steel production... run things through 3 rollers at most. Jamming the metal to shape. And introducing massive stresses.

    Well, I can tell you that cutting a 1/2 x 1/2 piece out of my part to make a feature... that 'cut out' part banana'd almost 3/8" of an inch over a bit more than 12 inches! Talk about stress.

    I read this post this morning... while making the part.

    Very informative and timely!

    Cheers,

    Sirhr


    PS. Ruger has been EDM-ing barrels for years. Saw the machines when doing a plant tour about a decade ago. Nothing new. The chemical stuff... that is some cool technology! Again, Theis, and the rest of the folks on SH are on the bleeding edge. This place is THE home for a lot of advances in, not just shooting, but in metallurgy, barrel design, CNC... so much amazing stuff goes on in this community. The ELR folks are at the bleeding edge all the time. Awesome!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: antecedent
    I was thinking exactly that as I read down through the thread and hit this one.
    But, I thought- nah, way too much metal to remove. Shows how much I know...:)
    Maybe they rough cut an undersized chamber in the conventional manner and finish it to final dimension using ECM?
    @THEIS, are you at liberty to talk about the details?
     
    I'm going to take a guess here and say it's for product and "operational" consistency. PECM is being touted as being able to hold very tight tolerances with a very fine surface finish on the finished parts. By operational consistency I mean every barrel produced will be exactly the same; same dimensionally, same surface finish, same cycle times from one part to the next.

    LOLOLOLOL

    Everyone said the same bullshit song and dance when CNC machining was new and people who know nothing about machining still believe it to this day. Don't think so? LOL this forum is full of those idiots.

    Color me skeptical
     
    • Like
    Reactions: LeftyJason
    LOLOLOLOL

    Everyone said the same bullshit song and dance when CNC machining was new and people who know nothing about machining still believe it to this day. Don't think so? LOL this forum is full of those idiots.

    Color me skeptical

    Yet, since it's inception in the 1940's, Numerical Controlled machining now dominates most areas of machining. Care to explain why? Your skepticism is misplaced here, all technology has it's birthing pains, doesn't mean it will never live up to it's potential. And just out of curiosity, if we were to have a part with contours and angles milled that would involve utilizing both a rotary table and a dividing head on a bridgeport, and tolerances to within +/-.0015 , 1/2 degree on the angles; which do you think would get the job done both more accurately and quickly, a bridgeport or a 5 axis machining center? For simplicity assume both machines are in top condition and the person doing the work is adequately skilled. Here in 40 years or so I would like to ask the same question again only include PECM in the comparison.
     
    Yet, since it's inception in the 1940's, Numerical Controlled machining now dominates most areas of machining. Care to explain why? Your skepticism is misplaced here, all technology has it's birthing pains, doesn't mean it will never live up to it's potential. And just out of curiosity, if we were to have a part with contours and angles milled that would involve utilizing both a rotary table and a dividing head on a bridgeport, and tolerances to within +/-.0015 , 1/2 degree on the angles; which do you think would get the job done both more accurately and quickly, a bridgeport or a 5 axis machining center? For simplicity assume both machines are in top condition and the person doing the work is adequately skilled. Here in 40 years or so I would like to ask the same question again only include PECM in the comparison.
    I think you misread what he was saying. He is in defense of cnc as in cnc is better. Now one or 2 parts can sometimes be done faster manually than cnc though.

    For goodness sake there's all kind of crazy accurate cnc out there already. There are grinders that grind angles to 4 decimal places with repeatability in the billionths. There are mills that can drill holes sideways through a hair.

    @308pirate comments are directed more to those that are skeptical of the pecm. There is a big difference between home ecm and cnc controlled pecm.
     
    I would see the big advantage as more in the materials opportunities it opens up - something along the lines of an inconel inner sleeve, which would directionally last forever, might become viable.

    An additional advantage might be cut-rifle product behavior with less time on the machine. It won’t beat button rifling for process timing, but it’ll be a nice middle ground on cost as well, presumably.
    Inconel barrels are already being made, not many from what I’ve heard.
     
    I think you misread what he was saying. He is in defense of cnc as in cnc is better. Now one or 2 parts can sometimes be done faster manually than cnc though.

    For goodness sake there's all kind of crazy accurate cnc out there already. There are grinders that grind angles to 4 decimal places with repeatability in the billionths. There are mills that can drill holes sideways through a hair.

    @308pirate comments are directed more to those that are skeptical of the pecm. There is a big difference between home ecm and cnc controlled pecm.
    Yes and no

    There's tons of people who honestly think that CNC machining can't make shit parts. That's who I'm referring to.

    I don't know much about PECM. I don't know what tolerances it can hold when the process is done correctly by someone who knows what he's doing. What I do know is that gun forum dumbasses will continue to assume that if it's made by machines it will always be perfect and that every part will be exactly identical to the next. Neither of those assumptions will ever true.
     
    Last edited:
    Yes and no

    There's tons of people who honestly think that CNC machining can't make shit parts. That's who I'm referring to.

    I don't know much about PECM. I don't know what tolerances it can hold when the process is done correctly by someone who knows what he's doing. What I do know is that gun forum dumbasses will continue to assume that if it's made by machines it will always be perfect and that every parts will be exactly identical to the next. Neither of those assumptions will ever true.
    True on that. There are tolerances for reasons. Sometimes you're closer to the edges but still good. They may not be perfect but they're pretty dang good (no I'm not talking about Pretty Dang Good Ammo®).

    There are many ways to see who works in the real world. Cnc machines are good but they're not perfect. Manual machines are good and for some quantities may be faster. Cnc machines ran crappily put out crap parts. It is possible to make absolute correct parts but you can't afford them. Most of the time absolute correct parts aren't needed. Not all features are created equal.

    I know there's a saying some thing along the lines that adding a decimal place to precision drives cost up 10 times or something like that. Numbers are probably off.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 308pirate