True Velocity Ammo

22 rounds of plastic cased ammo for $160?

That's a big NOPE from me.

Hollywood 6mm said:

22 rounds of plastic cased ammo for $160?

That's a big NOPE from me.

Click to expand...

But it comes in a commemorative package!!

At that price the cases should be Ceramic not freaking plastic.

rangerlong said:

I’ve had my eye on this company/concept for awhile

Click to expand...

Why?

2650 FPS for a 168 gr projectile: lame
Plastic cases (not reusable): lame
Ridiculous price: lame
Bunch of useless swag to make you feel special: extra lame

What is even the fucking point?

Hi,

That company has no reason whatsoever to divert from their business foundation of lighter weight ammunition for military aircraft utilization........

NOBODY in civilian world cares about carrying an extra pound in ammo weight when they are carrying 30lb 6GT 10 feet to the next stage.

Sincerely,
Theis

MarshallDodge said:

But it comes in a commemorative package!!

Click to expand...

Don't sell them short. It also comes with a challenge coin and recycling bag for spent casings...

Do they only come in White?

rangerlong said:

They’re local for me, and it’s cool they’re developing new technology so I was interested.
The cases are supposed to be reloadable, but probably just by them at this point.

If the price had come in at 2/3 or even 3/4 of FGMM for the same quality/consistency I would have bought some.
At this price though you’re right, there’s no point.

Click to expand...

New is useless unless it provides a compelling benefit over the current state of the art.

I see absolutely nothing plastic-cased ammo can provide as a compelling benefit even at the same price of brass-cased cartridges.

The fact is thier are benefits. Weight when carried over distance adds up over time.

Yes please get some, have them load it extremely hot compressed loads in those plastic cases, shoot in Serbu rifle with your face really really close to the breach.

All joking aside I'm not sure why you would be interested in this...? $7.27 RD for composite cased .308 ammo that is running 2650 FPS and G1 BC .462... None of that is special at all especially for the money, and I know ERic32 said the benefit is the weight over distance. How much weight are you saving on 22 RDS of composite VS 22 RDS of Brass a couple ounces maybe...

I am not talking about 22rds I am talking a full combat load of 200 or more rds

Eric32 said:

I am not talking about 22rds I am talking a full combat load of 200 or more rds

Click to expand...

Ok so cost per round is 230% increase to save 30% weight...? The only people using a full combat load will be the military and do you see the military considering 230% increase in cost to save 30% weight...?

Yes

The only time it makes sense is when you aren't the one paying for it.
They claim lightweight about 1000x on the website but I didn't see any mention of actual loaded round weight vs brass cases. Maybe I just didn't find it but that seems odd.

Eric32 said:

Yes

Click to expand...

Hi,

Not for personnel, nope.

This is not new technology, lol. Cutting weight for ammunition usage on aircraft has been through several technology flows.

The weight savings we are talking about only matters when the difference of a helicopter carrying (just for simplicity of numbers) 5000rds of standard brass cases at 2200lbs or carrying 7500rds of polymer cases at same 2200lbs.

Sincerely,
Theis

Eric32 said:

Yes

Click to expand...

Really please enlighten me on why the Military would consider composite cased ammo with sub par velocity / BC for a 30% weight reduction and 230% cost increase

Weight saving equals carrying capacity for human/machine.

Transportation weight works itself into logistical support range

@THEIS

Yes it all translates into or from supply chain and logistics. But I understand.

Eric32 said:

Weight saving equals carrying capacity for human/machine.

Transportation weight works itself into logistical support range

Click to expand...

Obviously, I thought you had actual facts or Data on why the Military would consider this

None that I can provide you.

rangerlong said:

True Velocity .308 WIN Collector’s Edition

tvammostore.com

Click to expand...

Hollywood 6mm said:

22 rounds of plastic cased ammo for $160?

That's a big NOPE from me.

Click to expand...

Plus $20 for shipping... If it's so light you think it would be cheaper to ship.

Ram4402 said:

Plus $20 for shipping... If it's so light you think it would be cheaper to ship.

Click to expand...

Should be free

Eric32 said:

The fact is thier are benefits. Weight when carried over distance adds up over time.

Click to expand...

Then they should market to the .mill because marketing to us is a waste of time.

I am only 5 classes away from my marketing degree but the second I get done. I'll let them know.

Cause we all know everyone feels matter now days.

Eric32 said:

I am not talking about 22rds I am talking a full combat load of 200 or more rds

Click to expand...

Steroids are cheaper and you can carry more than just extra ammo.

Sure

lte82 said:

Steroids are cheaper and you can carry more than just extra ammo.

Click to expand...

Plus your balls will weigh less. Win/win

308pirate said:

Then they should market to the .mill because marketing to us is a waste of time.

Click to expand...

Hi,

They have to attempt to go "civilian" now since it is looking more and more everyday that the NGSW program is favoring the Textron telescopic ammunition over the TV polymer ammunition.

So 3 years of hopes and dreams chasing the single .gov check is getting dimmer and dimmer......

Sincerely,
Theis

THEIS said:

Hi,

They have to attempt to go "civilian" now since it is looking more and more everyday that the NGSW program is favoring the Textron telescopic ammunition over the TV polymer ammunition.

So 3 years of hopes and dreams chasing the single .gov check is getting dimmer and dimmer......

Sincerely,
Theis

Click to expand...

Ooops...........

This product belongs in the military marketing lane. That being said, weight savings is the obvious for our guys. Less obvious is the ability to divert away from the need to mine natural resources of copper and zinc . These resources are not exactly unlimited. Then Lake City is pressed to max out its production to meet demand.

With these factors taken into account an alternative technology in polymer casings is very desirable. Considering access to the polymers are more readily available in comparison to the current brass tech. It only benefits the industry to have an additional product developed and eventually will be more cost effective for commercial sales.

I think these are going the same way the caseless ammo did a number of years ago,
Down the drain.

But.....but....it comes with a challenge coin. A CHALLENGE COIN!

Imagine slapping that sucker on the bar

So has anyone solved the heat problem with polymer (and caseless) ammo?

As anyone who has had hot brass go down the back of their neck, brass & steel cased ammo take a lot of heat out of the weapon when it's ejected. Polymer ammo carries far less heat and caseless none at all. That heat has to go somewhere, and it goes into the barrel.

Everything I have read in the past about this talks about heat retention as an issue that results in lower sustained fire rates.

I saw the .50 cal stuff a few years ago.
Folks don't realize what a 30% reduction in weight nets you when you are shipping 100's of thousands of rounds to a war zone.
Even the slight weight savings going from 30'06 to .308 meant huge savings in transportation costs when you consider the sheer volume of ammunition.

The "normal" stuff is available now, it seems. Dropped a post on that in the wrong place it seems.
$3.50 a round for the "regular" and you can't reload it. The Nosler CC is something of a disappointment to me. If they thought the light was getting dim at the prospect of not winning the .mil contract, they'd better hope this stuff delivers every bit of the single digit SDs and match grade accuracy they claim while costing way more the Federal, Hornady, Black Hills, HSM, etc.

It should be cheaper cause plastic$ < brass$

That shit could have a 0 es/sd and I still wouldn’t buy it at 3.50. I am sure that there will be some fucker with a Savage sniper rifle with a Counter Sniper on top that will say he is getting 1st round hits at 47 miles on a Coors lite can.

Reall weight saving is only 6 gram per round so unless you are really packing this it might not be worthwhile

deersniper said:

It should be cheaper cause plastic$ < brass$

Click to expand...

The galling thing for me is all the ad copy, er... excuse me, "objective reviews" that talk about how modern and efficient the production of the polymer case is... for the ammo to then be staggeringly more expensive. With a plain old Nosler CC in it, that's competing with FGMM @ less than half the cost.

So a few people own it. Has anyone shot it? Or did you buy it for the novelty factor to inspect since shooting $3.50 a round .308 makes you gag (and reasonably so)?

meestermeetch said:

So a few people own it. Has anyone shot it? Or did you buy it for the novelty factor to inspect since shooting $3.50 a round .308 makes you gag (and reasonably so)?

Click to expand...

If you are paying $3.50/round for plastic ammo, chances are you can afford it because you don't have a gag reflex

Mine's waiting on a "project" gun... most expensive ammo I've ever laid hands on. It'll have FGMM, Fed T308T, and TAP Precision 168 ELD-M to compete with once I get around to it... plus anything else I lay hands on meanwhile (really want some T308TTMK2).

I actually saw some of this ammo in Cabela's the other day, hunting fare loaded with Nosler ABs.


I was shocked to actually see some in person, and then shocked again to see a sticker that read "$69.99" under the box.

Gtscotty said:

I actually saw some of this ammo in Cabela's the other day, hunting fare loaded with Nosler ABs.
View attachment 7853234

I was shocked to actually see some in person, and then shocked again to see a sticker that read "$69.99" under the box.

Click to expand...

The amount of hype and outright bullshit on that label is unbelievable.

But wait, it says single digit SD! That's big bragging rights. I mean, there's at least three posts a day here where someone is showing ( or talking about) their single digit results....