Search results

One can recognize inherent problems in a system w/o thinking that means to eliminate the system. Yes much of government is corrupt, inefficient, and wasteful. Is that reason to end it, or reign it in? No one wants to answer the question of what happens if you're wronged in an anarchist system...

Logical consistency. You kill someone, you get killed. Can't get much more consistent than that. By lefty I mean folks who see personal responsibility and consequences the same way a vampire sees a crucifix and holy water.

Why can't leftys respond to direct questions?

Correct, as I prefer reality.

The first taste of reality is difficult if you're used to living in fantasy.

Laughable considering most career criminals never had a father as a significant influence in their lives.

So if an anarchist kills your child for some perceived slight, you'd have no problem with it?

Yes. We could retake control of government, and return it to its constitutional restraints if enough people decided to do it. With anarchy...

So anarchy, and if a neighbor thinks your kid offended his wife and kills them in response, there is no recourse other than killing him, or accepting it?

So the military should also be abolished, as government shouldn't have the authority to send people to die?

Yep. If a puppy pees on the carpet and you wait three months to swat it with a paper, the lesson is lost. Criminality comes from the animalistic part of the brain, so the comparison is apt.

Really? A guy in my town shot his 4 kids after his divorce. He came to the police station and gave a full confession before anyone knew the crime had happened. He wanted the death penalty, and it still took over a decade to get him executed. If you look at project innocence's numbers of wrongly...

True, but much of the US lacks the resolve to execute murderers.

https://bumpstock.com/

This should have been a lesson learned with prohibition. Banning things has never and can never work. If a demand exists, a supply will be found. Opium derivatives have been illegal since 1915, yet they can't even keep them out of maximum security prisons, where strip searches and body cavity...

If a certain scumbag would have been allowed to die, instead of muliple doses of narcan being administered, a whole summer of fiery but mostly peaceful protests could have been avoided.

Is there some reason you refuse to answer direct questions? A rhetorical question as we all know the answer.

Why not just admit you're a pathetic lefty who can't run your life w/o government handouts and trust a stranger in DC making decisions about your life more than trying to run it yourself?

Um humm

It's been over 30 years since dems lost a presidential and didn't claim it was stolen, or have you forgotten?