Re: 1-4 Power Adjustable Optic
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or not. If sincere, thanks, I guess. If not, what are your issues with my comment? I never advocated getting rid of a NF 1-4x in lieu of a Trijicon, I simply suggested that one not rule out a 1-4x because of externally adjustable turrets. They are only available on very high end scopes which may or may not have better optics than the Trijicon which has some of the best glass I've seen.
Why spend an extra few hundred dollars for a feature that is of very limited value on a 1-4x? </div></div>
Yes, I was being sarcastic. I think your opinion of dismissing an externally adjustable scope just because it is 1-4x, or because it is a 223 is ridiculous and short-sighted.
I practice long distance shooting with all my rifles by dialing elevation and holding for wind. To do so, I need external adjustments and a ranging reticle. If it works with a 308 and 3-12x, why all of a sudden does it not work with a 223 and a 1-4x? Yes, I understand a 223 is not a 308, but quitting at 400 meters is selling yourself way short. Hell, the standard TA-01 ACOG reticle has a BDC out to 800 meters.
Of course I use hold-overs. The NF Mil-Dot reticle with the skeleton dots makes it too easy. I've also banged 12" steel plates at 600 meters with my setup, and I wouldn't shy away from large targets at further distances . . . dialing for elevation of course.
I actually do like the Trijicon 1-4x, but I could never make the same kind of shots with it as I do with my NF.