Re: Doe killing with the 300 Blackout! Still cracks?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ATH</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I'm all for skill...I've defended long range hunting for years...but that doesn't mean anything goes.
</div></div>
Curious what you consider "long-range hunting" and why you would advocate taking a "long-range" shot with all the variability/ potential for error that can emerge with increasing distance, yet frown on someone taking a head shot at close distances. Movement can be (a) controlled considerably by giving a whistle, "bleet", or other noise to temporarily capture the deers attention right before breaking the shot or (b) reasonably patterned by studying the deer's behavior before taking the shot. As for the whole "smallest target" thing... the brain is at least 4 inches in diameter. As boone said, keeping in mind that this is a marksmanship oriented forum, a 4-6 inch target at 100 yards is not really a small target. As others have said, I have tracked more deer which incurred a shot to the vitals, than deer missing a jaw (i.e. none).
Please understand, I'm not suggesting that every hunter should take head shots. Every time I am at the processor I see deer that have been hit in the guts, shot multiple times, missing a leg, or some other iteration of a shot to the "vitals" gone wrong. Certainly, folks like that should not and in all honesty, probably shouldn't be shooting at an animal in the first place regardless of where they aim.
What I am saying, is that it's unfounded to label someone as an unethical hunter because they take head shots. I harvest 99% of my does with head/ upper-neck shots, as they yield a quick kill with no damage to the meat and are a nice 'n easy job for the guys that process my deer (who fight over which one is getting the deer whenever I pull in).