.308 Load Data with Mag Primer

gunderwood

Private
Minuteman
Aug 29, 2009
65
1
42
Virginia
Looking for anyone who has tried the following components in .308Win.

175SMK, Varget, and 215M

Yes, I realize that 210Ms are usually used, but my ES have been too large with CCI 200/BR2 and can't find any 210Ms. Thus, I want to try the 215M. I know to reduce the load, but would be grateful for any Varget/Mag primer load info.

Thanks.

Another options is CCI #34 primers which I understand are practically magnum primers anyways.
 
Re: .308 Load Data

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gunderwood</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It is possible I missed it, but I didn't see anything using Varget and large <span style="font-weight: bold">magnum</span> rifle primers. </div></div>

I didn't have fed 215 to test but did use cci 250's. sd was about twice what wlr and cci200 were. Velocity adv was about 20 to 30 fps faster as I recall.

Ah found the post.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Niles Coyote</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Specs
700 SA Rock Creek 11.27 twist, 21.5"

I have to thank <span style="font-size: 20pt">Lindy</span> on the Load
175 SMK
44.6 grains Varget
His load calls for federal match primers, but as I didnt have any I tried CCI 200's, CCI 250's and WLR
Lapua brass once fired and neck sized
Load .010 off the lands

CCI 200: Av 2682 Es 22 SD 12 for 5 with .303 CTC on target.

CCI 250: Av 2711 Es 62 Sd 34 for 5 with .792 CTC on target.

WLR: Av 2685 Es 19 Sd 12 for 5 with .516 on target. Most of that size was me, as the day before I put 4 into the .2's but did not have the crono then...


Nosler 168 CC BTHP
46 grain Varget
CCI 250
Lapua brass full length sized.
.010 off the lands

Av 2717 Es 16 Sd 9 for 3 shots with .19 CTC on target. Not a very big sample, but shows promise
grin.gif
</div></div>
 
Re: .308 Load Data

I have sort of the same problem with the .308, more ES/SD than I would like.

Part of the problem is that the primer contributes quite a bit in a .308 say compared to a 30-06, smaller case, less powder and don't forget that modern standard large rifle primers were primarily developed for the -06.

In the high power rifle world, some of the better known (meaning successful) shooters have been using the Russian primers which are the least hot primer that will reliably ignite the powder in a .308, and they are seeing lower ES/SD numbers. They are not using wimpy loads either to boot to 1,000 yards.

Other things which affect ES/SD are neck tension, uniform brass, uniform seating depth, uniform firing pin strike energy, uniform powder charge and even temperature of the rounds.

Just for grins, you might try some of the old .308 standby powder, IMR 4064, carefully weighing out charges to see how your numbers compare. Except for it's temperature sensitivity, 4064 would be my powder of choice. It gets a little peaky pressure wise with heavy loads and higher temps.
 
Re: .308 Load Data with Mag Primer

Found this from here (http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads...e_magnum_primer):

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A recent article in Handloader Magazine titled "Developing and Accurate .308 load: Handloading for accuracy"(DEC, 2008)is probably the most thorough, objective, scientific article I have read yet on load development (I wish there was an article like this for the .300 WSM, the gun I shoot). But I digress.

In this article, the author states that primers must be matched to powders for best accuracy (i.e., a primer that produces excellent accuracy with one powder may not with another powder). In the author's tests, the primers that produced the best accuracy when using VARGET were, in order from most-to-least accurate:

1) CCI No. 250 (.4375" average)
2) Federal 210GM
3) Federal 215
4) Winchester WLR
5) Federal 215GM
6) Winchester WLRM
7) CCI#34 (Arsenal)
8) Federal 210
9) CCI#200
10) Remington 9 1/2M
11) Remington 9 1/2
12) CCI BR-2 (.7500" average)

Tests were done with four 5-shot groups. Again, these results were obtained using VARGET - using a different powder may have produced different results. Hope this helps.</div></div>
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVAV71
Re: .308 Load Data with Mag Primer

I wouldn't even bother reducing the load. If it's safe with one primer, it's safe with another. As a disclaimer, I will tell you to work your load down and back up, but I've experienced a load that was safe with one primer and not with another.
 
Re: .308 Load Data

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rust</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have sort of the same problem with the .308, more ES/SD than I would like.

Part of the problem is that the primer contributes quite a bit in a .308 say compared to a 30-06, smaller case, less powder and don't forget that modern standard large rifle primers were primarily developed for the -06.

In the high power rifle world, some of the better known (meaning successful) shooters have been using the Russian primers which are the least hot primer that will reliably ignite the powder in a .308, and they are seeing lower ES/SD numbers. They are not using wimpy loads either to boot to 1,000 yards.

Other things which affect ES/SD are neck tension, uniform brass, uniform seating depth, uniform firing pin strike energy, uniform powder charge and even temperature of the rounds.

Just for grins, you might try some of the old .308 standby powder, IMR 4064, carefully weighing out charges to see how your numbers compare. Except for it's temperature sensitivity, 4064 would be my powder of choice. It gets a little peaky pressure wise with heavy loads and higher temps. </div></div>

Yes, a lot of things come into play. My ES isn't awful, but I want much better (approx. 30fps). I keep looking around, but it looks like trying 250/215M with Varget works well as long as you reduce the load.

http://www.6mmbr.com/gunweek097.html
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="font-weight: bold">Varget Yields Low ES/SD and Lapua Brass Shows Minimal Runout</span>
I headed out to the range, armed with my chronograph, to see if I could find a good load with Varget and the 175 SMKs. I chronographed loads from 42.0-44.0 grains of Varget, using both BR2 and CCI 250 primers. (My past experience loading for .308s, suggested this 42.0-44.0 range should deliver good accuracy.) For the first outing however I decided to seat the bullets just touching and at a later date play with seating depth a bit more to fine-tune my loads.

I settled on 43.0 grains of Varget and CCI 250s. This load gave me an average velocity of 2657 fps with an extreme spread (ES) of 10 fps and a standard deviation (SD) of 4. Those ES/SD numbers were for a 10-shot chrono string. [Editor: Those are impressively low numbers, which should translate to very tight vertical at long range.] I might mention that loaded round runout on my Sinclair concentricity checker was .001" or even less. You gotta love that Lapua brass!</div></div>

While not .308Win and Varget, it is an interesting study comparing BR2 and 215M primers in a similarly sized case. http://www.the-long-family.com/primer_study.htm
 
Re: .308 Load Data with Mag Primer

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I wouldn't even bother reducing the load. If it's safe with one primer, it's safe with another.</div></div>

If you take a max .308 load using a standard large rifle primer, and switch to a large rifle magnum primer you will very likely redefine your definition of "safe".

Large rifle magnum primers, in particular the Winchester are much hotter than standard primers and in a smaller case can actually affect the burn rate of the powder. This is going to jack pressures. If you were already using a hot load pressures could spike badly.

Not like small rifle primers where there isn't that much difference between the standard and magnum primers (depending on brand).
 
Re: .308 Load Data with Mag Primer

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rust</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I wouldn't even bother reducing the load. If it's safe with one primer, it's safe with another.</div></div>

If you take a max .308 load using a standard large rifle primer, and switch to a large rifle magnum primer you will very likely redefine your definition of "safe".

Large rifle magnum primers, in particular the Winchester are much hotter than standard primers and in a smaller case can actually affect the burn rate of the powder. This is going to jack pressures. If you were already using a hot load pressures could spike badly.

Not like small rifle primers where there isn't that much difference between the standard and magnum primers (depending on brand). </div></div>

Perhaps I'm more cautious than others, but I was planning on starting with a minimum load of 39-40gr of Varget and working my way up. 45gr works well, but not great with the CCI 200/BR2 in my rifle. 45gr is pretty much max by most books. I have no pressure signs, but haven't tested the load in 100F+ temps.