Well, over the weekend my latest build hit a snag of sorts; I am having a T/C Icon chambered up in 338 WM, and it has an internal box mag with a length of 3.5", so I need my rounds to be a bit shorter than that. I am building the gun around the ability to shoot the Berger 250 gr Elite Hunter projectiles; based on Nosler's load data (https://load-data.nosler.com/load-data/338-winchester-magnum/), I was planning on running 71.5-ish grains of H4831 and running the projectile at 2800-2900 FPS out of my 26" (to Nosler's 24") barrel.
Well, last week, I received the dies that I ordered, and over the weekend went to load up some ammo. Being a semi-cautious sort, I decided to start with 70 gr... uh, Houston, we have a problem. More specifically, we have a severe shortage of space. With 70 gr of H4831 in the case, I couldn't come anywhere CLOSE to being able to seat the 250 gr Berger to my desired (3.43) OAL. Shit. I was able to work it down to 3.54, but the load was already compressed at that point, and was still over mag length. Double shit. So I started looking for alternate powders, looking at burn rate charts, and realized that even if I find a powder with a "smaller" charge (in terms of charge weight), I had no idea how much room in the case that charge would occupy. So I started looking for a way to quantify the "bulkiness" of various powders only to find that I was of course trying to reinvent the wheel... there are existing powder bulk density charts (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...m/powder.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1q2ZVU6VeeHMPpDVBEu_LI) that list the weight-per-volume of various powders. Thaaaaaat's more like it.
So, looking at the density chart, I see that Accurate MagPro is noticeably more dense than is H4831... and that at a given weight, I would see about 8.5% less space occupied by the powder if I use it instead of H4831. So, off to the store to locate some MagPro... and was able to find some at Cabela's of all places. In any event, looking at load data for MagPro powder (which burns noticeably slower than H4831 (it's closer to H1000 than H4831), I started at 68.0 gr and moved up in half grain increments up to 70.0 gr, then .2 gr increments up to 71.0 gr.
The barreled action is still a couple of weeks out, so it'll be awhile before I can get any results... but I also picked up some H414 and may build a similar set of stepped loads in order to run them through and check for pressure signs.
Well, last week, I received the dies that I ordered, and over the weekend went to load up some ammo. Being a semi-cautious sort, I decided to start with 70 gr... uh, Houston, we have a problem. More specifically, we have a severe shortage of space. With 70 gr of H4831 in the case, I couldn't come anywhere CLOSE to being able to seat the 250 gr Berger to my desired (3.43) OAL. Shit. I was able to work it down to 3.54, but the load was already compressed at that point, and was still over mag length. Double shit. So I started looking for alternate powders, looking at burn rate charts, and realized that even if I find a powder with a "smaller" charge (in terms of charge weight), I had no idea how much room in the case that charge would occupy. So I started looking for a way to quantify the "bulkiness" of various powders only to find that I was of course trying to reinvent the wheel... there are existing powder bulk density charts (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...m/powder.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1q2ZVU6VeeHMPpDVBEu_LI) that list the weight-per-volume of various powders. Thaaaaaat's more like it.
So, looking at the density chart, I see that Accurate MagPro is noticeably more dense than is H4831... and that at a given weight, I would see about 8.5% less space occupied by the powder if I use it instead of H4831. So, off to the store to locate some MagPro... and was able to find some at Cabela's of all places. In any event, looking at load data for MagPro powder (which burns noticeably slower than H4831 (it's closer to H1000 than H4831), I started at 68.0 gr and moved up in half grain increments up to 70.0 gr, then .2 gr increments up to 71.0 gr.
The barreled action is still a couple of weeks out, so it'll be awhile before I can get any results... but I also picked up some H414 and may build a similar set of stepped loads in order to run them through and check for pressure signs.