5-G is dangerous in many ways

Gunfighter14e2

Hunter/trapper of Remora's
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 9, 2002
11,068
17,574
Lick skillet Alabama
eham.net
I submit you will start seeing these towers like others having issues before long. The public is not as stupid as some would like to believe. Plus many in a out of the game are starting to leak the truth about how the game can be played to stave off the true intent of this public lie.

 
The only way things change is if it costs more to do an keep up, than what is reaped in return. Tower crews are not cheap nor 100% 24/7. Know a few of the crew chiefs an owners an all seem to have big smiles when talking about 5G. Remember just because you can't see it does not mean it's not there, as the days of mono trees are about over an the old ways of hiding shit is coming back,..quickly.

Just an YFI , Laws pasted during 9/11 an shortly there after protect this shit/gear under the guise of National security. 1984 was here in 1966-67 an has only gotten better with every passing day.
 
Not my Forte, on subject of untested millimeter bandwidth radiating threw on humans long term and all other life that we live with. All surrounded by a blanket of 5G cutting threw all living cell structure . . ( insert internet sarcasm here)--> . Hey who does not want faster download of video gaming and Porno. ??? .
Porn. Gaming, texting and faster electronic personal devises is the paper-thin superficial enticement dangled for all to get on-board and embrace the new radiating blanket of Love . But in the end, ( keeping up with the Jones's ) it does not matter what what you think because military industrial complex and national security trump all . ( National security hides all ) with funding spent to develop and subsidize the 5-G subcontracting, and No Worries as they will print-up new money to cover it all if they find there budgets a little thin this year .
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TACC
Isnt millimeter wave the same technology they use for eye fucking you at the airport?


"...It's just the equivalent of a chest X-Ray..."

I think it was a few months ago when I posted something here about if you ever see the government start pushing a new health fad or say this or that is good for you or whatever, it is time to do a lot of independent research and in the meantime, avoid the thing like the plague until you are certain of what it does and what negative consequences it can have on you...

If someone from the government, any government, said that water is wet, I am going to have to see it and test it personally before I take their word for it.
 
Isnt millimeter wave the same technology they use for eye fucking you at the airport?
-
( eye Fucking you in airports ? ) you mean Retina Scan ? .
. I think lots of applications for millimeter wavelengths, and electronics not my forte so I really not that interested . I think it all revolves on exact precision lengths and gigahertz/cycles it moves at .
the other big talk is Fed.Gov. projects non-lethal millimeter wavelength weapons also .
.
 
"...It's just the equivalent of a chest X-Ray..."

I think it was a few months ago when I posted something here about if you ever see the government start pushing a new health fad or say this or that is good for you or whatever, it is time to do a lot of independent research and in the meantime, avoid the thing like the plague until you are certain of what it does and what negative consequences it can have on you...

If someone from the government, any government, said that water is wet, I am going to have to see it and test it personally before I take their word for it.

I concur. After a few seconds on Al Gore's interwebs, I easily found a few articles regarding the potential effects of this technology and found that were actually a few areas that have already banned it's use.
 
-
( eye Fucking you in airports ? ) you mean Retina Scan ? .
. I think lots of applications for millimeter wavelengths, and electronics not my forte so I really not that interested . I think it all revolves on exact precision lengths and gigahertz/cycles it moves at .
the other big talk is Fed.Gov. projects non-lethal millimeter wavelength weapons also .
.
Not the retina scan. I'm talking about the one where they make you stand spread eagle in the plastic tube while they xray you to check out the size of your cock, tits, etc.
 
AHhhhh. You mean.. electronic TSA voyeurism ..
I thinking you meant " Eye-Fuckin " as in the heating up of your optic fluid by wave exposure .
I was always woried about that shit when climbing Masts and Towers with the heating optic fluid and even testicles being over exposed with the huge assortment of transmission waves being pumped out .
 
Not the retina scan. I'm talking about the one where they make you stand spread eagle in the plastic tube while they xray you to check out the size of your cock, tits, etc.
No wonder the TSA guys/gals gave me a wink and nod as I went through... (I have an enormous clitoris.)
 
There is a lot to worry about with 5G but the effect of exposure to mm-wave radiation is not it by a long shot...forget the towers and the radiation...think control as that is the key to 5G. The ability to provide you convenience that you have never experienced. Downside is the dependency it will create. In order to do this, much more coverage is necessary. I'll leave it at that. Towers (macro structures) and 5G are inconsistent. 5G is all about better coverage so they can maintain the speed they need. Smaller, lower power cells at a higher density is the deployment model for 5G. They can do that by exploiting something called MIMO which is a fancy antenna coupled to a super fancy radio. That is the piece we see. The handset and the little boxes on top of all the light poles versus large towers with a shit ton of antennas on them. Now it is one light pole and 1 box on top to make it aesthetically pleasing to municipal authorities.

5G is all about ubiquitous access to control of all aspects of the equipment you deal with on a daily basis. The IoT has been moving on a parallel track to provide connectivity into every aspect of your life. Refrigerators, washers/dryers, lighting, etc all will connect to the network. You will soon be able to control everything from your phone. What's in my fridge? Not enough peanut butter....I will order you some peanut butter....dependency. Crude example but it makes my point. The 5G piece connects the equipment to the internet at a speed not previously available with 4G technology. The speed of evolution within telecom is unparalleled in the history of man. It makes landing on the moon child's play.

1990s early - cellphones for voice only become reasonably cheap...this was the beginning of the end.
Early 2000 - SMS via GSM in Europe and CDMA providing web based connections in the US made personal connectivity into something Star Trek portrayed.
2005 - 3G deployments in a viable way throughout US and Europe. First ability for photo and web based services in a meaningful manner. Quasi real time access to information depending on location.
2009 - 4G with almost real time access in major metropolitan areas.
2014 - 4G pretty much everywhere where people now expect access to information and services immediately. Pissed off when they don't have access.
2019/2020 - The realization of IoT and ubiquitous coverage

In 30 years this technology has evolved more than any other....networks cost tens of billions of dollars to deploy and we spin a new one every 10 years or sooner. What I am discussing is one part of it. The web technology and the security of networks is another piece that I haven't even touched on. Security not for you but for the provider...no one really cares about you.

There is soooo much more to it.....you ain't seen nothing yet...the technology will kill us. And it will do so like cancer...from the inside out.....you won't know it until it is too late.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Last edited:
There is a lot to worry about with 5G but the effect of exposure to mm-wave radiation is not it by a long shot...forget the towers and the radiation...think control as that is the key to 5G. The ability to provide you convenience that you have never experienced. Downside is the dependency it will create. In order to do this, much more coverage is necessary. I'll leave it at that. Towers (macro structures) and 5G are inconsistent. 5G is all about better coverage so they can maintain the speed they need. Smaller, lower power cells at a higher density is the deployment model for 5G. They can do that by exploiting something called MIMO which is a fancy antenna coupled to a super fancy radio. That is the piece we see. The handset and the little boxes on top of all the light poles versus large towers with a shit ton of antennas on them. Now it is one light pole and 1 box on top to make it aesthetically pleasing to municipal authorities.

5G is all about ubiquitous access to control of all aspects of the equipment you deal with on a daily basis. The IoT has been moving on a parallel track to provide connectivity into every aspect of your life. Refrigerators, washers/dryers, lighting, etc all will connect to the network. You will soon be able to control everything from your phone. What's in my fridge? Not enough peanut butter....I will order you some peanut butter....dependency. Crude example but it makes my point. The 5G piece connects the equipment to the internet at a speed not previously available with 4G technology. The speed of evolution within telecom is unparalleled in the history of man. It makes landing on the moon child's play.

1990s early - cellphones for voice only become reasonably cheap...this was the beginning of the end.
Early 2000 - SMS via GSM in Europe and CDMA providing web based connections in the US made personal connectivity into something Star Trek portrayed.
2005 - 3G deployments in a viable way throughout US and Europe. First ability for photo and web based services in a meaningful manner. Quasi real time access to information depending on location.
2009 - 4G with almost real time access in major metropolitan areas.
2014 - 4G pretty much everywhere where people now expect access to information and services immediately. Pissed off when they don't have access.
2019/2020 - The realization of IoT and ubiquitous coverage

In 30 years this technology has evolved more than any other....networks cost tens of billions of dollars to deploy and we spin a new one every 10 years or sooner. What I am discussing is one part of it. The web technology and the security of networks is another piece that I haven't even touched on. Security not for you but for the provider...no one really cares about you.

There is soooo much more to it.....you ain't seen nothing yet...the technology will kill us. And it will do so like cancer...from the inside out.....you won't know it until it is too late.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I could totally see this integrated into that social program talked about in another thread. Didn’t vote the right way? No milk for you until change the way you think.
 
The potential for misuse has not even been imagined
Yes it has but, most that know will not talk about it until they see which way the locals lean. Keeping things close is a huge advantage until it's no longer time to play nice. Remember all tech works both ways. Plus just like electrics of all kinds, it's all fun an games until it's no longer there. Only after a few days/weeks do the words of others one off'ing info, does it really sink in how complacent the so called "on top of their game types" really are.

The book, "One second After" is so right about many things but also so wrong about many other things. The Book "Going Home" by A. American is much closer to the over all truth to me. The follow on books of both are telling,...
 
Looked up Going Home on Amazon. Ten books; 60 bucks for the lot as Kindle.

Did you read them all, are they intelligently written, are they worth their cost?

I'm on a slippery slope here, help me out...

I've read Fortschen; and he's very, very good.

If this is similar quality, it's a slam dunk for me; I read two to four books a week.

Greg
 
Looked up Going Home on Amazon. Ten books; 60 bucks for the lot as Kindle.

Did you read them all, are they intelligently written, are they worth their cost?
I have only read the first one (GH), but am getting ready to start the second. I'd suggest getting the first one used an decide from there. Mine came from a goodwill in fla an was only 6-8 bucks delivered. The second was 3 bucks at a local flee market. I was more into Going Home than One Second After. Both are worth the read for different perspectives of the same event, depending where you were an doing at the time. There are some major psychological an logistical issues both books address very well, I might add. However depending your back round, you will see some flaws as well, but those could have been intended by both authors as well.
 
There is a lot to worry about with 5G but the effect of exposure to mm-wave radiation is not it by a long shot...forget the towers and the radiation...think control as that is the key to 5G. The ability to provide you convenience that you have never experienced. Downside is the dependency it will create. In order to do this, much more coverage is necessary. I'll leave it at that. Towers (macro structures) and 5G are inconsistent. 5G is all about better coverage so they can maintain the speed they need. Smaller, lower power cells at a higher density is the deployment model for 5G. They can do that by exploiting something called MIMO which is a fancy antenna coupled to a super fancy radio. That is the piece we see. The handset and the little boxes on top of all the light poles versus large towers with a shit ton of antennas on them. Now it is one light pole and 1 box on top to make it aesthetically pleasing to municipal authorities.

5G is all about ubiquitous access to control of all aspects of the equipment you deal with on a daily basis. The IoT has been moving on a parallel track to provide connectivity into every aspect of your life. Refrigerators, washers/dryers, lighting, etc all will connect to the network. You will soon be able to control everything from your phone. What's in my fridge? Not enough peanut butter....I will order you some peanut butter....dependency. Crude example but it makes my point. The 5G piece connects the equipment to the internet at a speed not previously available with 4G technology. The speed of evolution within telecom is unparalleled in the history of man. It makes landing on the moon child's play.

1990s early - cellphones for voice only become reasonably cheap...this was the beginning of the end.
Early 2000 - SMS via GSM in Europe and CDMA providing web based connections in the US made personal connectivity into something Star Trek portrayed.
2005 - 3G deployments in a viable way throughout US and Europe. First ability for photo and web based services in a meaningful manner. Quasi real time access to information depending on location.
2009 - 4G with almost real time access in major metropolitan areas.
2014 - 4G pretty much everywhere where people now expect access to information and services immediately. Pissed off when they don't have access.
2019/2020 - The realization of IoT and ubiquitous coverage

In 30 years this technology has evolved more than any other....networks cost tens of billions of dollars to deploy and we spin a new one every 10 years or sooner. What I am discussing is one part of it. The web technology and the security of networks is another piece that I haven't even touched on. Security not for you but for the provider...no one really cares about you.

There is soooo much more to it.....you ain't seen nothing yet...the technology will kill us. And it will do so like cancer...from the inside out.....you won't know it until it is too late.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I've already decided to not buy into any of that. There will never be anything in my house connected to the internet, except the PC when it's being used for that.

No smart anything. Eventually there may not be any dumb appliances. I'll either run it unconnected, buy a used relic, or do without.

I don't even have a Google account for my phone and have never downloaded any apps into it from anywhere. What came with it is it, and I've disabled as many as I can figure out to disable. I know it doesn't make me invisible, but then again, a stealth bomber isn't invisible either. It just looks like something it's not on radar.
 
Bill burr walk your way out.

Couldn’t find the clip cause it’s a new special but his bit on the airport scanners is gold

000A8851-BBA5-4BE7-BEA2-19996F8A6C4C.png

73FD21D6-BFD1-464C-98C9-1DD7533452E9.jpeg
 
the same people who hate 5G, don't look at the power output of their home WIFI router.
Or of their in ear or over ear bluetooth

Yes we do. At least I have the option of opting out of those or minimizing the exposure. Unless you go off grid not going to have much of a choice with 5G. Thats the real issue. I could care less if people talk 24/7 with a cell phone to their ear sitting next to a wifi booster while huffing paint and licking lead bullets. Good on them. I just dont want to have to. I have never owned a house near a cell phone tower before quite intentionally.
 
Just bought Going Home kindle. Pricey for me...
I will say the author did his research well on the places covered in the first book as all the roads an way points mentioned are fact. I use to travel Fla for work for over 15 years an know every spot save one or two in the Ocala national forest. I think you will like the read an as an old NV vet will see how tactics are used by both sides. The gang banger's vs guys who have had very little training vs those who have been down the road. Also how complacency can seek up.

After you complete the first book, let me know how you like it.

BTW,... have you read One Second After yet?
 
Only with 5G can Porn stream be tuned in real time to to the new normal he/she/it or any 50+ genders that are fluidly changing while an ap is running a wifi device embeded in said individuals butthole.


e93.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Blue Sky Country
There is a lot to worry about with 5G but the effect of exposure to mm-wave radiation is not it by a long shot...forget the towers and the radiation...think control as that is the key to 5G. The ability to provide you convenience that you have never experienced. Downside is the dependency it will create. In order to do this, much more coverage is necessary. I'll leave it at that. Towers (macro structures) and 5G are inconsistent. 5G is all about better coverage so they can maintain the speed they need. Smaller, lower power cells at a higher density is the deployment model for 5G. They can do that by exploiting something called MIMO which is a fancy antenna coupled to a super fancy radio. That is the piece we see. The handset and the little boxes on top of all the light poles versus large towers with a shit ton of antennas on them. Now it is one light pole and 1 box on top to make it aesthetically pleasing to municipal authorities.

5G is all about ubiquitous access to control of all aspects of the equipment you deal with on a daily basis. The IoT has been moving on a parallel track to provide connectivity into every aspect of your life. Refrigerators, washers/dryers, lighting, etc all will connect to the network. You will soon be able to control everything from your phone. What's in my fridge? Not enough peanut butter....I will order you some peanut butter....dependency. Crude example but it makes my point. The 5G piece connects the equipment to the internet at a speed not previously available with 4G technology. The speed of evolution within telecom is unparalleled in the history of man. It makes landing on the moon child's play.

1990s early - cellphones for voice only become reasonably cheap...this was the beginning of the end.
Early 2000 - SMS via GSM in Europe and CDMA providing web based connections in the US made personal connectivity into something Star Trek portrayed.
2005 - 3G deployments in a viable way throughout US and Europe. First ability for photo and web based services in a meaningful manner. Quasi real time access to information depending on location.
2009 - 4G with almost real time access in major metropolitan areas.
2014 - 4G pretty much everywhere where people now expect access to information and services immediately. Pissed off when they don't have access.
2019/2020 - The realization of IoT and ubiquitous coverage

In 30 years this technology has evolved more than any other....networks cost tens of billions of dollars to deploy and we spin a new one every 10 years or sooner. What I am discussing is one part of it. The web technology and the security of networks is another piece that I haven't even touched on. Security not for you but for the provider...no one really cares about you.

There is soooo much more to it.....you ain't seen nothing yet...the technology will kill us. And it will do so like cancer...from the inside out.....you won't know it until it is too late.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


As someone who is deploying this shit, I can say this is good info. Before you guys freak out about brain cancer, etc. A 25Ghz MM wave LAA small cell will only transmit about 50 yards. A standard radio on a tower now transmits at 80W. The antenna has between 16-33dB gain. (Remember every 3dB doubles the power) you can stand 5' in front of an antenna and not set off a Radman. You wanna see some shit. Hold that same Radman 12" from your 17" computer screen and see what happens. Probably not eye strain or masterbation that's making everyone blind.

So LAA isn't shit for power. The streets of any city is saturated with RF now.

As to Iot, it's already deployed nation wide. I don't know how much saturation the market has at this point, but it's been live over a year. This shit is is just Alexa on steroids.

Personally, I don't like a lot of this stuff. Not because of health concerns, These aren't 3 watt bag phones, but the laziness it allows. I sit at lunch sometimes and watch entire families do nothing but look at their phones. No conversation at all. That's what's killing us...
 
After you complete the first book, let me know how you like it.

BTW,... have you read One Second After yet?

Yes, I will; and Yes, I have.

I have One Year After and The Final Day, but have yet to read them. Pillar To The Sky was also very good.

I got the new Kindle Oasis on its first day of issue, and I'm transitioning between the Fire and the Oasis; two quite different machines.

Greg