So last night in our defensive position another student and I got into an arguement about the effects of a .50 BMG or 12.7mm at close ranges. He argued that the bullet wouldn't have to actually hit a person to cause a lethal effect, basically stating that the bullet passing with a couple inches of a person would be effect to harm or kill them. He said it was because of when the bullet broke the sound barrier.
I argued that it would be impossible simply becuase if that was the case all my paper targets would get destroyed everytime I shot once. Now I assume I'm right cause I have the experience, though not with a .50 or 12.7mm, to back up what I'm saying. Here's the catch though one of our 0331 instructors said he's tested the theory on a frozen pumpkin and it worked. I find that hard to beleive.
Basically I want to know whether or not the first arguement is valid
I apologize ahead of time cause I know this has been asked before, I just don't have time to search on my own. Thanks for the replies.
I argued that it would be impossible simply becuase if that was the case all my paper targets would get destroyed everytime I shot once. Now I assume I'm right cause I have the experience, though not with a .50 or 12.7mm, to back up what I'm saying. Here's the catch though one of our 0331 instructors said he's tested the theory on a frozen pumpkin and it worked. I find that hard to beleive.
Basically I want to know whether or not the first arguement is valid
I apologize ahead of time cause I know this has been asked before, I just don't have time to search on my own. Thanks for the replies.