Re: 7mm rem mag
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bignada</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Think I would go the other way.
A .280rem, Ackley Improved is more versatile and will yield longer barrel life. The .284 win is also a good choice especially in a long action if you plan to use the heavy match bullets, which you must to get the best Ballistic Coefficient performance.
Then again, look at the 6.5x55 if you are cool with a 140gr match bullet.
No real need to go magnum for 7mm precision.
If you want real longrange ballistic performance the .338 is the ticket, and a .338 win will work, or even better the .300win mag necked up to .338. The hornady 250gr bthp will give .650 BC heavier bullets even more BC... The 7mm 175gr smk is .498 BC iirc.
Look at the 6.5mm bullets if longrange precision is your goal. If you plan to shoot elk, you can probably use the magnum power and 7mm Rem will be fine. <span style="color: #FF0000">Most "tactical competitors" who score well use 6mm or 6.5mm guns for their lighter recoil and great ballistic performance.</span> </div></div>Sure...'till the wind picks up.
I'm a 7RM fan. I'm building a custom long range/tactical in 7RM and really looking forward to seeing how it performs. I've been hunting with a Ruger M77 Allweather in 7RM for years. Out of the box it was sub moa with Hornaday factory ammo, and all the rifle I've ever needed.The biggest complaint I hear is about the recoil and yes, at the end of a day at the range, you know you've been behind one, but heck...I'm 5'6, 160lbs...if I can take it anyone can.