We own both the oehler 35p aswell as the magneto V2. Both are acccurate and both have plus and min points. I have tested them both in the follwing setup; the 35p at 3m infront of the muzzle and the magneto attached to the barrel. After shooting about 50 shots with 5 rifles, the results were almost exactly the same. However, the results from the 35p were ofcourse a bit slower, due to the 3m distance, but when a bullit went slower, both chronos showed this, and if another one went faster, both showed the same amount of increase.
Next to that, the magneto has a big plus because it is not light sensitive due to it works with magnetism, so indoor shooting is no issue. If you need to shoot multiple rifles than it is a bit slower handling, because you need to remove and install the chrono from and to each rifle, with a stand-alone chrono like the 35p this is no problem, you just put another rifle behind it and start shooting, alot quicker.
But the 35p can not be installed everywhere. If your shooting ground is on a hill side or uneven terrain, you"ll have a hard time installing it. (It is not a big problem, just bring the chrono to your flat shooting range, but for some hunters who want or need to test their ammo in their hilly hunting field, it can be). The magneto since it attaches to your barrel, can be shot everywhere.
With light barreld rifles the weight of the magneto did show a little difference in poi. With heavy sniper barreled rifles, poi remained exactly the same.
The 35p cost almost 3 times the price of the magneto (or at least for us eurotrash this is a fact due to customs crap).
Other than that, if you just need a chrono for your self, i would suggest the magneto v2, cost less, more versatile and just as accurate as the 35p, which is considered by many as topnotch.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
now Free