• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Am i doing this correctly? (MRAD help)

Throat Toaster

Private
Minuteman
Sep 19, 2019
27
6
I was making a drop chart, using the Hornady 4DOF app. I set the output to MRAD because my scope has true mil dots. I'm going to go out and test it, to see if the Dots line up with the yardage I have estimated.

For example, it said at 400 yards, I need to come up 0.98 MRAD. So the first mil Dot below the crosshair should hit at 400. The next dot should be 550 (come up 2.01 mrad).

At 12x, my mildots are true, 6x they double and at 24x they are cut in half. I might have that backwards though, I'm still learning.

I know testing is the only way to know for sure. This is just to get me in the ballpark. The load is the Hornady 165 GMX Superformance for the .300 Win Mag.

So, am I on the right path? Thanks in advance!

PhotoPictureResizer_190925_012837133_crop_661x955.jpg
 
Last edited:
Is your scope first focal plane or second?

If it's first focal plane, a mil is a mil no matter what magnification you are on. If it's second, and it's a true mil at 12x like you stated, then at 6x each mil in the reticle will cover more target, so it's actualy two mils from dot to dot. At 24x the reticle will cover less target, so it will be 1/2 mil from dot to dot.
 
Is your scope first focal plane or second?

If it's first focal plane, a mil is a mil no matter what magnification you are on. If it's second, and it's a true mil at 12x like you stated, then at 6x each mil in the reticle will cover more target, so it's actualy two mils from dot to dot. At 24x the reticle will cover less target, so it will be 1/2 mil from dot to dot.
SFP and thanks
 
Is your scope first focal plane or second?

If it's first focal plane, a mil is a mil no matter what magnification you are on. If it's second, and it's a true mil at 12x like you stated, then at 6x each mil in the reticle will cover more target, so it's actualy two mils from dot to dot. At 24x the reticle will cover less target, so it will be 1/2 mil from dot to dot.

This.

Your idea is heading in the right direction. SFP makes it a bit harder than it needs to be, and I've always wondered if just like mechanical turrets - can the mag adjustment setting be 'off'. (I.e. at 24x its actually 25.3x or 23.6x, etc)

Also remember, you'll need to factor in density altitude and temperature when you make your quick come up cards as it'll be different from the time you zero and make your initial card.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Throat Toaster
I guess youre doing it right (cant speak to the exact trajectory but it seems youre on the right track) but just for the sake of ease: the strelok pro app has a reticle view thing that once you enter your rifles data it will show you what the reticles subtensions are scaled to.

1569438643855.png


Also, with turrets you can dial in your adjustment exactly without having to scale for magnification regardless of focal plane
.1 mils dialed is .1 mils always
 
  • Like
Reactions: Throat Toaster
I guess youre doing it right (cant speak to the exact trajectory but it seems youre on the right track) but just for the sake of ease: the strelok pro app has a reticle view thing that once you enter your rifles data it will show you what the reticles subtensions are scaled to.

View attachment 7153393

Also, with turrets you can dial in your adjustment exactly without having to scale for magnification regardless of focal plane
.1 mils dialed is .1 mils always

Thanks so much for your help. I'm just getting started in LR shooting. As I said in another thread, this rifle is my starter kit. So when I got the opportunity to trade for the Bushnell Elite Tactical scope, I jumped on it. I hadnt heard any negatives on it, except it only had 44 MOA of adjustment. But I think that should be enough to get a .300 WM to 1k.

I'll go download Strelok Pro. Thank you again.