Another SJW leftist mole working for a .gov contractor

[308pirate]

I bet she had access to sensitive information in her work for .gov contractors and Dept of State. She needs to be investigated, that's for damned sure. Plus she needs to update her LinkedIn status to "unemployed"

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/07...motorcade.html

https://www.linkedin.com/in/julibriskman/

http://heavy.com/news/2017/11/juli-briskman-flipping-off-trump/comment-page-1/

 

[pmclaine]

A private employer has standards.

She didn't meet those standards.

The company made a decision to part ways believing an employee with no self control was not in their interest.

No big deal but Im guessing she will pull a Colin Kaepernick because its no longer whether or not you have the ability, skill and competence but can the social justice warriors use you as a wedge.

 

[308pirate]

I'm less interested in the issue of her dismissal and more about what kind of access to sensitive information she had when working where she did.

 

[pmclaine]

Do you suggest some sort of litmus test for employment?

If her job was sensitive there was a background invest.

If she passed than she passed.

Should we have a loyalty oath to the office holder?

I swore my oath to the Constitution.

 

[308pirate]

Do you suggest some sort of litmus test for employment?

If her job was sensitive there was a background invest.

If she passed than she passed.

You're an intelligent man, which is why I am surprised you don't get my point.

Remember this woman?: https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/...ed-for-leaking-classified-documents-to-media/ She passed her hiring background investigation, evidently.

The point is, since evidently I haven't made it clearly enough, is that this woman should be re-vetted again to make sure she has not done anything compromising to national security based on her access to information at work. Plenty of precedent in my eyes to do so.

 

[pmclaine]

Yes after the fact it should be considered what projects was she working on and would her demonstrated animosity to the administration have benn an issue on those projects.

Yes my concern was that you were considering some sort of pre hiring interview about politics.

Personally as soon as it was seen that she attended Georgetown that should have identified her as a Communist.

 

[oneshot86]

now that fatty doesnt have to work, she can ride her stupid bike and lose some weight...
overweight loud mouth bitch

 

[1J04]

You're an intelligent man, which is why I am surprised you don't get my point.

Remember this woman?: https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/...ed-for-leaking-classified-documents-to-media/ She passed her hiring background investigation, evidently.

The point is, since evidently I haven't made it clearly enough, is that this woman should be re-vetted again to make sure she has not done anything compromising to national security based on her access to information at work. Plenty of precedent in my eyes to do so.

Remember, this is the guy that spent a few days in a cardboard fort. lmfao And ya, I'd have to agree he's intelligent as well as hilarious when he wants to be. But then again, we happen to have some pretty amazing folks on here I'd venture to say. Now more on point, I can't wait to see what the ACLU is gonna do for this poor deprived soul. Squat. And speaking of squat. Gimme 50.

 

[Tazman]

If I could get in there...I would put her picture in the Motivational Picture thread!!!

 

[mtrmn]

I'm wondering how/why she or anybody else would be ALLOWED THAT CLOSE TO THE POTUS to start with. Could have just as easily been Aloha Snackbar with an AK or RPG.

 

[308pirate]

I'm wondering how/why she or anybody else would be ALLOWED THAT CLOSE TO THE POTUS to start with. Could have just as easily been Aloha Snackbar with an AK or RPG.

I found that odd too, unless that particular motorcade was a decoy.

 

[308pirate]

If I could get in there...I would put her picture in the Motivational Picture thread!!!

Her picture is right up front and center in her linkedin profile