• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Anyone notice this about Varget and IMR 4895?

Nessal

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 19, 2009
202
1
40
CA
I loaded some .308 155grn A-Max with IMR 4895 in the past and at 40grn, I was getting less than half MOA at 100. Quite surprised at the results. I loaded some Varget and started the load at 40grains and worked up to 43grans. At 40grains, the grouping was COMPLETE CRAP. I noticed as I worked up the load, it tightened up considerably.

Does anyone have similar experience with using IMR 4895 and Varget?
 
Re: Anyone notice this about Varget and IMR 4895?

Yes I have noticed that on some powders. Then all of a sudden
the accuracy can fall out of the bottom with a 2/10 grain increment.
 
Re: Anyone notice this about Varget and IMR 4895?

Did you start out with a clean or fouled barrel?

My procedure when developing a new load is to make 5 extra rounds with the starting load, to first foul the barrel. I pay no real attention to the grouping with those first five. Especially if my barrel was squeaky clean when I started.

Over the years I noticed that first few shots with a clean barrel almost never shot well. Even if the barrel is well fouled, when I change powder, bullets, et al, I always discount the first five, then fire for effect.

This is not a scientific analysis, and it is not powder or caliber specific, but just an observation I made over the last 38 years of reloading.

Bob
 
Re: Anyone notice this about Varget and IMR 4895?

Ok. Heres my .02.

I have no clue as to what barrel length or anything for that matter, that you are running so I'm going of what info has been provided.

IMR & H4895, & Varget are two different powders, with different burn rates - 4895 being the faster of the two.

In this case, I think velocity in a given node is the issue here.

I'm going to use MY rifle as an example.

26" Bartlein, 11.25 twist,

All loads using Lapua brass, CCI BR-2 primers, and Lapua 155 Scenars, and 175 SMKs.

For <span style="font-weight: bold">175 SMK's</span> with a target velocity of <span style="font-weight: bold">2725</span> fps I was rollin a flat 44 gr of Varget.

Switch to the <span style="font-weight: bold">Lap 155</span>, with a target velocity of 2940 fps, I was rollin 44.5 gr H4895

TO ACHIEVE THE SAME VELOCITIES USING VARGET, I ROLL <span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-weight: bold">46.7</span></span> GR VARGET.

Notice how your groups tightened up as you creeped up to 43 gr Varget???? Velocity.

This is just my 0.02. YMMV
 
Re: Anyone notice this about Varget and IMR 4895?

I'll take a look at this again and see how it turns up. I didn't know IMR4895 has such a huge difference in burn rate than Varget. Thanks guys.