• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Apple Fined At Least $1.95 Billion for Blocking Music Streaming Customers From Getting Cheapest Deal

PatMiles

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 25, 2017
1,551
4,132


March 4 (UPI) — The European Union fined Apple at least $1.95 billion on Monday for exploiting its market position to illegally block music subscription providers directing App Store users toward cheaper prices for the same subscription elsewhere.
The fine was imposed after an anti-trust investigation found Apple had “anti-steering provisions” in place preventing streaming services from telling owners of iOS devices such as iPhone and iPad about other services, the European Commission said in a news release.
“For a decade, Apple abused its dominant position in the market for the distribution of music streaming apps through the App Store. They did so by restricting developers from informing consumers about alternative, cheaper music services available outside of the Apple ecosystem. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules,” said competition executive vice-president Margrethe Vestager.
The anti-steering rules also banned developers from telling users about price differences between in-app subscriptions sold through Apple’s in-app purchase mechanism and those available elsewhere or providing links to their website where they could subscribe directly.
Developers were also prevented from contacting their own newly signed-up customers by email or other channels to inform them about alternative pricing options, the commission said.
Apple’s rules, which the commission said were unnecessary and disproportionate to the threat to its commercial interests, “negatively affect the interests of iOS users, who cannot make informed and effective decisions on where and how to purchase music streaming subscriptions for use on their device.”
“Apple’s conduct, which lasted for almost 10 years, may have led many iOS users to pay significantly higher prices for music streaming subscriptions because of the high commission fee imposed by Apple on developers and passed on to consumers in the form of higher subscription prices for the same service on the Apple App Store,” the commission said.
Anti-steering also inflicted a non-monetary “degrading” of the iOS user experience, forcing consumers to undertake “cumbersome” searches to track down offers outside the App Store, or denying them the chance to subscribe to any service due to being unable to find the right one on their own.
Apple responded by rebuking the commission for a decision it said was reached without “any credible evidence of consumer harm” and ignored the “realities of a market that is thriving, competitive, and growing fast” and accused regulators of favoring its European rival, Spotify, saying the Swedish company met with the commission 65 times during the investigation.
“The primary advocate for this decision — and the biggest beneficiary — is Spotify,” Apple, said in a statement in which it claimed Spotify had paid it nothing for services that had helped it capture 56% of Europe’s streaming market and make it one of the most recognizable global brands.
“A large part of their success is due to the App Store, along with all the tools and technology that Spotify uses to build, update, and share their app with Apple users around the world.”
In January, Spotify announced it would be allowed to offer in-app sales on iPhones and iPads starting in March after Apple was forced to allow it under European Union regulations.
The changes under the EU’s Digital Markets Act will enable Spotify customers to “seamlessly” purchase and upgrade subscriptions along with audiobooks and other products within the Spotify app.
Previously, transactions were only permitted via the App Store, where Apple took a 30% cut.
In addition, Spotify said it would be able to provide details of subscription and audiobook prices, previously also blocked from appearing within the app.
The commission argued that by only allowing developers to distribute their apps to iOS users in the European Economic Area via the App Store, Apple controlled every aspect of the iOS user experience and set the terms and conditions with which developers must comply in order to get access to European iOS users.

$1.95 BILLION!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Milf Dots
Apple’s reply was “Meh, you want a check or cash?”
 
This is actually just a back door tax the EU made to put on American companies winning in Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redmanss
Let me get this straight.

Apple offered music services through Apple Music, and other services in their App Store, yet failed to inform their customers of a cheaper alternative?

Am I understanding this correctly?
 
This is actually just a back door tax the EU made to put on American companies winning in Europe.
And there is the real truth. Socialists being socialists. They don't see it as a for-profit company to welcome their innovation and improve their peoples' lives, they see it as a state commodity to hustle and glean Euros from at every corner they can. They've stolen billions from Google as well.

I've been pretty vocal around here about my discontent with and despise of Big Tech, but I hate the EU and their commies far more.
 
Let me get this straight.

Apple offered music services through Apple Music, and other services in their App Store, yet failed to inform their customers of a cheaper alternative?

Am I understanding this correctly?
What you're reading is the EU created laws against common business practices as a way to fund their bullshit through massive fines.
 
What you're reading is the EU created laws against common business practices as a way to fund their bullshit through massive fines.
Not defending their practices but at least we got a universal charging cable (for now) instead of proprietary. They demanded that so made financial sense to give it to us also I suppose.
 
Not defending their practices but at least we got a universal charging cable (for now) instead of proprietary. They demanded that so made financial sense to give it to us also I suppose.
The EU made a huge stink about charging cables, that was their hill to take. But it's just a charging cable, and you could buy a Lightning compatible cable from countless brands without buying one directly from Apple for a few bucks. I have separate types of cables for my TVs and computers, each of my vehicles take a different type of battery and have varying terminals and positioning, and they have yet to go after EV automakers for their different types of charging cables. Shit, we can't even get down to 10 different types/sizes of oil filters for varying sizes of engines small to large, we have no fewer than a thousand on the market from over the years.

But why was Apple such an antitrust offender they had to go after them? Because they wanted more money from them, plain and simple. Was the Lightning cable harming anyone? Was it dangerous, a threat to public safety, or even "damaging to the environment" as they typically like to target? Nope, it was just another cash grab.

Don't be happy for a company being forced to kneel to the EU or any .gov entity, it's bullshit every time.
 
The EU made a huge stink about charging cables, that was their hill to take. But it's just a charging cable, and you could buy a Lightning compatible cable from countless brands without buying one directly from Apple for a few bucks. I have separate types of cables for my TVs and computers, each of my vehicles take a different type of battery and have varying terminals and positioning, and they have yet to go after EV automakers for their different types of charging cables. Shit, we can't even get down to 10 different types/sizes of oil filters for varying sizes of engines small to large, we have no fewer than a thousand on the market from over the years.

But why was Apple such an antitrust offender they had to go after them? Because they wanted more money from them, plain and simple. Was the Lightning cable harming anyone? Was it dangerous, a threat to public safety, or even "damaging to the environment" as they typically like to target? Nope, it was just another cash grab.

Don't be happy for a company being forced to kneel to the EU or any .gov entity, it's bullshit every time.
Had Apple any balls, they would have told the EU to get fucked.

They could have held out for a few months and the EU would have caved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M4orturnate